B.R.F ARMY

To Be British is not a RACE
It is a set of shared VALUES
We RISE when we stand TOGETHER
TOGETHER we can achieve ANYTHING

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

We want a Britain for British Values

What has Labour and the Conservatives brought this once proud nation?

Immigration
Crime
Islam
Grooming gangs
Destruction of English culture

BASICALLY ANTI BRITISH

B.R.F the resistance begins now

[Piers Morgan @piersmorgan]

You lying pr*ck. We all saw and heard what you said.

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

YES

[Red Eagle Updates 🦅🇺🇸 @RedEagleUpdates]

🚨 PLEASE BE HONEST:

Do you stand with Elon Musk in his fight against the British government?

A. YES
B. NO

[Paul Golding @PaulGolding]

⚠️ PLEASE DON'T BE VIOLENT OR KICK OFF AT ANY PROTEST OR THE ESTABLISHMENT WILL USE IT AS A PRETEXT TO CLAMP DOWN ON ALL THE PROTESTS HAPPENING AROUND THE COUNTRY. KEIR STARMER AND CO WANT THINGS TO TURN UGLY SO THEY CAN CLAIM THE MORAL HIGH GROUND AND IMPLEMENT A POLICE STATE!

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

@Wokewaster They are probably waiting for a Sharia Court to sentence him to a nice holiday in Magaluf.

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

@KatEv345 @Ian_Ward_Army @UKLabour @Keir_Starmer @CovenantTrust It's shocking isn't it, not just Labour all political parts did the same.

[Kat @KatEv345]

@Ian_Ward_Army @UKLabour @Keir_Starmer @CovenantTrust It is so wrong on so many levels that the government is prioritising illegal migrants on our veterans.

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

@Boldyboy1975 Seen it all before, for the 16th time on Twitter does anyone have any original content.

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

If you live near the area or have the capacity to get there, please attend the protest meeting.

Now is the time for us to come together and put a stop to this.

The more people there the better. Let's take our country back!

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

Over 1B a month and we wonder why the country is heading downhill.

[Neil O'Brien @NeilDotObrien]

The Telegraph leads on data I obtained via Freedom of Information - we are now spending a billion a month on UC benefits for overseas nationals, and even then ... (1/2)

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

The Bigamy Act 1604 made polygamy illegal.

Here we can see that we are paying for polygamous marriages if DWP recognises them. Up to four wives.
We're paying for something that the country has said is illegal.

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

Sign the petition below to stop our tax money being spent to house illegals in hotels

https://t.co/tvBubtA5xk

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

Please read

[Lewis.B.Rendell Official @Lewisrendell1]

Post: Islam’s Lobbyists Are Strangling Britain’s Soul—and We Must Stop Them (Part 1)

Britain is under siege, and the battleground is our own town halls. Islamic advocacy groups—spearheaded by the smug, insidious Muslim Council of Britain (MCB)—aren’t just knocking on the doors of our councils; they’re kicking them down, reshaping this nation in Islam’s image. From Bradford to Tower Hamlets, these groups, flush with cash and cloaked in “community” rhetoric, are bullying spineless councillors into submission. Mosque expansions sail through planning like it’s a done deal. Halal menus infest our schools. And “hate speech” rules—straight out of a sharia playbook—silence anyone who dares speak out. This isn’t influence; it’s conquest, and it’s rotting the heart of Britain.

Let’s lay it bare. The MCB, which swans about as Islam’s respectable face, was nailed in a 2015 government report for ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, a global outfit hell-bent on swapping our liberties for their theocratic fantasy. Yet they’re handed the keys to Whitehall and every major council chamber. In 2023, Tower Hamlets rewrote its speech laws after these groups leaned in, turning honest debate into a crime—say a word against Islam’s spread, and you’re cuffed. Over 1,200 Brits were arrested in 2024 under these vague laws, many for nothing more than a tweet that ruffled the wrong feathers (Home Office stats). In Leicester, mosque projects get greenlit while community halls crumble, and Bradford councillors admit they run every “sensitive” decision past Islamic groups, as if British voters are an afterthought.

This is Islam’s game: weaponize “offence” to gag us, flood our institutions with their demands, and call it diversity. Their own documents—MCB’s 2020 report—boast of “shaping policy” to entrench Islam’s grip, from school curriculums to public spaces. Every mosque, every censored critic, is a brick in their wall, built to smother Britain’s spirit. Our leaders, too gutless to face a Twitter mob, let it happen, trading Magna Carta for appeasement. The media? They’re busy painting patriots as the villains while Islam’s lobbyists rewrite our laws.

We’re not just losing ground; we’re losing Britain. Our councils, once the backbone of local pride, are now Islam’s footstools. This is no accident—it’s a deliberate push to make our nation unrecognizable. Part 2 will name the councils rolling over fastest and the traitors letting it happen. For now, the line is drawn: Islam’s advocates want control, and we won’t kneel. It’s time to rip their influence out by the roots and reclaim our country for good.

#BritainForBrits #IslamOut #NoMoreSurrender

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

Thread about Islam. Interesting read.

[Lewis.B.Rendell Official @Lewisrendell1]

Islam’s Violent Core: Unmasking the Quran and Hadiths’ Calls to War and Oppression

For years, Muslims and their apologists have claimed that critics of Islam “misinterpret” or “take out of context” the Quran and Hadiths, painting a peaceful religion as violent. They insist the texts are nuanced, defensive, or historically bound. But a closer look at Islam’s foundational scriptures—particularly verses calling for slaughter, war, and slavery—reveals a troubling truth: these texts provide ample justification for intolerance and aggression, fueling jihadist ideologies and clashing with modern values. Let’s strip away the excuses and examine the evidence, exposing the uncomfortable reality that Muslims often dodge.

The Quran’s Bloodthirsty Commands

Take Quran 9:5, the infamous “Sword Verse,” which commands: “Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war).” Muslims claim this targets only specific 7th-century treaty-breakers who attacked first. But the verse’s language is chillingly broad—kill pagans “wherever” you find them, unless they convert, pray, and pay charity. This isn’t defense; it’s a convert-or-die ultimatum. The follow-up, 9:6, offers protection to those who surrender, but that’s a weak consolation when the default is slaughter. Classical scholars like Ibn Kathir even argued this verse overrides earlier, softer ones, making it Islam’s final word on dealing with non-believers.

Then there’s Quran 2:191: “Slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter.” Muslims insist this is about self-defense, pointing to the context of Meccan persecution. But the vague term “fitna” (translated as oppression or disbelief) opens the door to killing anyone who merely rejects Islam. Some traditional tafsirs, like al-Jalalayn, equate fitna with idolatry, implying all non-Muslims are fair game. The verse’s call to “slay” first and ask questions later doesn’t scream restraint.

Perhaps most damning is Quran 9:29: “Fight those who believe not in Allah… even if they are of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” This targets Jews and Christians, demanding they submit to Islamic rule and pay a humiliating tax. Muslims call Jizya a “protection fee,” akin to taxes in other empires. But the command to fight until non-Muslims are “subdued” reeks of supremacism, not coexistence. Classical jurists like Al-Shafi’i saw this as a mandate for endless jihad, a blueprint for conquest that groups like ISIS eagerly follow.

Hadiths: A Playbook for Conquest

The Hadiths, Islam’s secondary scriptures, are no less troubling. Sahih al-Bukhari 4.52.177 quotes Muhammad: “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.” Muslims claim this refers to specific hostile tribes, but the sweeping phrase “the people” suggests a global mission. No qualifiers limit it to self-defense, and jihadist groups cite it to justify attacking anyone who won’t convert. If this is “contextual,” why does it read like a universal decree?

Sahih Muslim 19.4294 lays out a chilling protocol: when facing polytheists, offer conversion, submission, or war. If they refuse all three, “fight them and take from them what you can.” Muslims call this a negotiated approach, but it’s a thinly veiled demand for surrender. The “take what you can” part—implying plunder and captives—shows Islam’s comfort with profiting from conquest. This isn’t about defense; it’s about domination.

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

We see the pattern and it is repeating again.
Labour will bankrupt us again before we vote them out.

[Leland Menhenott @LMenhenott]

45 - Labour elected
47 - Britain Bankrupt
64 - Labour elected
64 - Britain Bankrupt
74 - Labour elected
76 - Britain Bankrupt
97 - Labour elected
08 - Britain Bankrupt.

It hasn't worked, it never will.

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

Have you seen the results of this survey? Are we surprised by them?

No, we're not.

It has always been this way where muslims are concerned. They put their religion first. That is why they are pushing for Sharia Law in this country because it is more important to them.

We can't let this happen. We must come together and protest. We are the majority. Let's raise our voices so they know we won't allow it in our great nation.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨BREAKING: A survey of British Muslims asked how they identify “first and foremost”

As Muslim 71%
As British/English 27%

Integration hasn't worked.

Source: The Times [Waterstone Insight]

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

This is a sign on dominance.

They believe they have the upper hand, and are untouchable so they will do things like this.

Who is more likely to be arrested? White people signing hymns or muslims?

This is a sign of dominance, they can do whatever they want without repercussions because we have allowed it. By bending over backwards in a failed attempt of multiculturalism, and giving Muslims whatever they demand they now know they are untouchable.

[Subversive Force @SubversiveForce]

🚨 Allahu Akbar! Islamic call to prayer outside the Old Bailey during the Filton 18 trial, by extremist Muhammad Umer Khalid of Palestine Action. Arrested on Christmas Day for alleged vandalism & attended last Sunday’s Iranian Regime-sponsored Al Quds rally. Domination tactics!

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

Here we see muslims patrolling certain areas of London enforcing Sharia Law. Trying to stop people who are legally drinking under British law, and also trying to control what women wear.

Listen to what they say when they see a gay man.

We are not safe from them!

It will be there way, or some form of punishment. Gay people will suffer, women will suffer.

We need to remove this cancer from our country before it's too late.

[Stu thats all you get🇺🇸🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Boldyboy1975]

What the actual F**k😳

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

Could this be the religion of peace again?

Alum is 88% muslim so it is highly likely that this will be an islamist. There is a 12% chance it isn't but considering 90% of MI5 terror watchlist are islamists it is more than likely a muslim.

Why do we have to live this way?

This is England and we have an ideology that wants to take over and impose it's law on us all weather we like it or not.

Time to remove Islam, FROM THE UK!

[B.R.F ARMY @BRF_ARMY]

Can't get a home? Can't ge the school you want for your child? Can't afford to have children because of low pay, taxes, and the cost of living?

People like this are the reaon why. This man has three homes which the British tax payer pays for. He'll have at least two kids with each of his three wives.

White British have the most people in work so we are paying for our replacement. We can't afford to have children but we pay for people like him to have them.

How long do we allow this to continue? When do we say enough is enough?