Bota Fogos and Shimmies

All views are my own.

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Isn’t it interesting that Bill Gates appears in every major global emergency of the last 20 years? Pandemics. ‘Climate Change’. And now? AI. And it really is strange that he always has the ‘solution’ waiting…

[Mrs B @attackdogX]

So, a woman with a great rack posing with some footballs is “setting women’s sports back”,

but a dude in a one piece swimsuit with his balls hanging out in the women’s competition as he laps them in the pool is “brave”, “stunning”, & “progressive”?

[Lembit Öpik @lembitopik]

Labour wants to limit donations to parties because Reform UK just got big money. But Labour’s had its nose in the trough of union funding for decades. The hypocrisy stinks

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Western society is currently divided between people who know this is a man and are prepared to say so and those who know this is a man but lie out of obedience to an ideology. There is no third option. Literally nobody on earth thinks "Roxanne Tickle" is actually a woman.

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

Women who give birth are not ‘birthing people, or chest feeders’ it’s so bloody insulting. No child has ever, in the whole history of time been born from a man. Stop removing our words for a tiny minority who pretend biology is irrelevant. The utterly frustrating thing is this does not go both way when talking about prostates or erectial dysfunction problems.. men don’t get called penis or prostate owners! 😡 It’s why it’s so obviously a men’s rights movement. It’s just women who are supposed to give up opportunities (sports/awards/places) & our descriptive words. Nothing changes. And stupid handmaidens cheer this new erasure along.

[Susan Hall AM @Councillorsuzie]

It wasn’t ‘your’ money Mr. Khan it was taxpayers money. Majority of London taxpayers would rather that our money went into making us feel safe not on a £20million weekend party!

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

Are you lowering the age for the full responsibility of criminal offences then? If old enough to vote, then old enough to go to adult prison & be held fully culpable. The point being no government should pick & choose based on where it might benifit them, not society or the individual.

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

Stop using men to sell women’s sports wear would be my advice. Along with not sponsoring male athletes to race in women’s sport.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who aren’t involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable?

Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms?

That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres?

That men don’t belong in women’s sport?

That female prisoners shouldn’t be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders?

That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues?

That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context?

That women shouldn’t be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex?

That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights?

That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society?

That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit?

That gay people shouldn’t be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as ‘genital fetishists’ when they don’t?

That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists aren’t actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology?

That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political left’s credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century?

Let me have your thoughts.

[Paulo Spitzbarth 🇧🇷🇩🇪🇮🇱 @PauloSpitzbarth]

🚨🇺🇸 CAR@LHO, QUE LAPADA! 🔥🔥🔥

CNN: “Este é um imigrante sem documentos...”

Miller: “Eles estavam aqui ILEGALMENTE?”

CNN: “Quero que esta seja uma discussão de boa-fé...”

Miller: “Quando você usa uma linguagem feita para ocultar a verdade, isso NÃO é boa-fé. Um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL é um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL. Eles não são ‘imigrantes sem documentos’.”

CNN: “Stephen, estamos tentando humanizar o debate...”

Miller: “Humanizar? Então vamos humanizar o Código Penal também. O assaltante de banco passa a ser ‘especialista em retirada sem agendamento prévio’. O estelionatário vira ‘empreendedor de narrativas financeiras alternativas’. O cara que entra na sua casa sem convite é só um ‘visitante com documentação pendente’. Que tal?”

CNN: “Isso é uma analogia grosseira.”

Miller: “Grosseira é fingir que a lei federal some porque a redação da CNN inventou um eufemismo mais fofo. ‘Sem documentos’ soa como alguém que esqueceu a carteira no Uber. Não. É alguém que cruzou a fronteira sem autorização, ficou, e agora a imprensa trata o estatuto jurídico como se fosse uma questão de estilo de escrita.”

CNN: “Mas muitos contribuem para a economia...”

Miller: “Ah, o argumento clássico: o crime deixa de ser crime se a pessoa lava prato ou constrói telhado. Pelo mesmo critério, o contrabandista de cigarro também ‘contribui’, gera emprego no transporte. Quer que a gente chame ele de ‘empreendedor logístico informal’? A CNN topa?”

CNN: “Você está polarizando.”

Miller: “Não. Eu estou recusando o dicionário de marketing. Vocês mudam a palavra, depois acusam quem usa o termo legal de ser ‘desumano’. É o truque mais velho do livro: primeiro suaviza o vocabulário, depois declara vitória moral. Os Estados Unidos já cansaram desse teatro. Chamem o que é. Ou admitam que o objetivo nunca foi clareza — foi controle da narrativa.”

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

I don’t like to say “we told you so,” but we did. We really did.

[Dean Cain @Deancain]

Suicidal Empathy.

[Cllr Owain Clatworthy @OwainClatworthy]

Without a doubt, Britain is being Islamified.

Deny it if you like. Then walk through Cardiff, Rochdale, Blackburn, Luton, parts of Birmingham, Bradford and large stretches of East London.

It is not “multiculturalism.” It is one culture. Islam.

British families have been pushed out. High streets have changed. Flags have changed. The atmosphere has changed.

The establishment will call this “far-right.” They always do. The British public can see what is happening with their own eyes.

I will not sit back and watch this country become something else. Neither should you.

[Matt Le Tissier ✝️ @mattletiss7]

Very true

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

What??? This is so see through, of course the press will ignore the biggest part of this story!

under the guise of ‘protecting’ people from bad builders the gov is launching an app.

The new government “Trusted Payments” system to stop ‘cowboy builders’ will create an extraordinarily detailed digital record every time you use it for work on your home including…

▪️Your name and address
▪️Exactly what work is being done
▪️Contracts and quotes
▪️The cost of the work
▪️Payment milestones
▪️Photographs and snagging records
▪️Payment approvals and transaction records

And on the business

▪️Identity and business details
▪️Bank/payment information
▪️Business and tax numbers
▪️All work they carry out

So a simple private transaction between you and your builder becomes a structured digital record of WHO you are, WHERE you live, WHAT you are doing to your property and HOW MUCH you are spending on it!

You would be insane to voluntarily share this data with a government tying up data between all departments, creating a massive file on you!

Come on people Wakey Wakey!

[Bev Turner @beverleyturner]

Omg GET OUT OF OUR LIVES!

No government has ANY BUSINESS acting as some sort of agent for our private building work!!

When Andy Burnham came in, I said that i worried he was a much better salesman, a much nicer man to push forward the same agenda: a Big-State, controlling entity guiding us into the inescapable digital cage in which money is pushed upwards and we plebs must be grateful of being "kept safe."

This app to "protect you" from cowboy builders is merely surveillance dressed up as benevolence.

It will require ALL the details of your build: address, list of works, photos, payments etc etc...a great way to check on you and how much your house is worth.

Just imagine the outcry if Starmer had suggested this nervously from a podium!!

But as it's Freddo Andy, it must be good for you.... this is a tipping point for me.

They've shown their hand.
PAY ATTENTION.

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

They quit the Royal Family, sold the story and cashed the Netflix cheque. They shouldn’t then expect the British public to pay for their security.

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

Not f*****g generous enough ?!!!

Free roof over their heads
Free food 3 times a day
Free healthcare & dentistry
Free taxis and buses
Free legal aid
Free WiFi
No utilities or bills whatsoever

What else you want to give these chancers ?!!

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

Trans activists & their friends think they have this great gotcha in “just let people live their lives, what’s it to you?” but have never once applied it to themselves. In fact, the *entire* ideology is about controlling other people - what we say, think & do - and if you don’t know that, you’re so ignorant on transgenderism it’s embarrassing.

[Queen Bee @KingBobIIV]

All the mothers in Europe: