Bartholomew Templefree

[Bartholomew Templefree @BTemplefree]

@RepYassAnsari Muslim isn't a race, retard. Everyone hates muslims.

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

250,000 British girls were raped by Muslims. Do you think anybody cares about being called racist?

[Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sargon_of_Akkad]

The first Pakistani lord was a convicted grooming gang member.

[Right Angle News Network @Rightanglenews]

A clip of a UK refugee council using girls as young as 12 years old to encourage migrant men to come to the United Kingdom is resurfacing amid the release of the grooming gang inquiry report.

Jail isn’t enough.

[John F Kennedy Jr @John_F_kJr]

🚨 JUST IN: Kavanaugh and Alito just TORCHED the entire “independent commission” scam and the left is panicking because this is a HUGE win for President Trump

They went straight for the jugular. The question was simple: can Congress just slap the word “independent” on ANY Cabinet office and basically wipe out presidential power?

Kavanaugh wasn’t having it.
“Independent agencies aren’t accountable to the people. They’re not elected. Yet they’re exercising MASSIVE power over liberty and billion-dollar industries.”

Then Turley sums it up: Kavanaugh and Alito made SHORT WORK of the defenders.
Can Congress make ANY department “independent”?
Can they give them 20-year terms?
Every time the justices pressed, the other side COLLAPSED.

This is the Supreme Court reminding Washington who actually runs the executive branch.

Trump needed this. And he got it.p

FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.

[Hazel Moore @HazelMoore32]

🚨 HUGE UPDATE: The U.S. Supreme Court appears ready to shut down state laws that allow ballot counting beyond Election Day.

Justice Alito made it clear: “Election Day” exists for a reason — elections are decided on Election Day. 🇺🇸🔥

[Paul White Gold Eagle @PaulGoldEagle]

SUPREME COURT DELIVERS MAJOR RULING THAT COULD RESHAPE EDUCATION, CITIZENSHIP, AND ELECTION LAW

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued what many are calling one of its most consequential decisions in recent years, delivering a 6-3 ruling that strengthens parental rights and reignites the national debate over education, religious liberty, and the role of government in family life.

At the center of the case was a simple but powerful question:

Can parents opt their children out of classroom materials that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs?

The Court's answer has shifted the landscape.

A VICTORY FOR PARENTAL RIGHTS

The case involved parents from diverse religious backgrounds who argued that their school district previously provided notifications and opt-out opportunities for lessons involving LGBTQ+ themes and other sensitive materials.

According to legal reports, those accommodations were later removed because increasing numbers of families were using them.

The parents argued that the government should not compel children to participate in instruction that directly conflicts with their religious beliefs.

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito emphasized that forcing parents to either accept the instruction or pay for private education creates an unfair burden on constitutional rights.

THE DEBATE OVER PUBLIC EDUCATION

During arguments, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson suggested that dissatisfied parents could pursue private schooling or homeschooling.

The majority, however, recognized that many families simply do not have realistic alternatives.

Low-income households, single-parent families, and rural communities often rely entirely on public education.

The ruling signals that public schools must remain accessible while also respecting the constitutional rights of parents and families.

THE DISSENTING VIEW

Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson sharply disagreed, arguing that the ruling could threaten the traditional role of public education.

The dissent maintained that schools should expose students to a broad range of ideas that reflect a diverse society.

Critics of that position argue there is a clear distinction between teaching academic subjects and introducing controversial social or ideological concepts to young children without parental consent.

A GROWING NATIONAL DEBATE

For many Americans, this case goes far beyond one school district.

It has become a broader battle over parental authority, religious liberty, and concerns that public education is moving from instruction into ideology.

The ruling reinforces that parental opt-out rights cannot simply be eliminated when constitutional protections are at stake.

MORE MAJOR CASES COULD BE COMING

Attention is now turning to several additional Supreme Court cases that could have nationwide consequences.

Among them:

• Birthright citizenship and the interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
• Election integrity and whether mail-in ballots received after Election Day should be counted.

Any decisions in these areas could significantly reshape constitutional law and public policy for years to come.

A TURNING POINT

Supporters see the parental-rights ruling as a major reaffirmation that parents remain central participants in their children's education and moral development.

Critics see it as a significant shift in the relationship between public schools and constitutional rights.

Either way, one thing is clear:

The Supreme Court has once again become the central battleground in America's debates over education, family authority, constitutional protections, and the future direction of the Republic.

Follow: US Debt Clock ⏰

[Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet @Tironianae]

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. SCOTUS Justice Sam Alito asks ACLU lawyer "what is a man and a woman?" and they DON'T HAVE A DEFINITION.

Alito's response is perfect.

ALITO: What does it mean to be a man or woman?

ACLU: We do not have a definition for the Court.

ALITO: How can a court determine whether there's discrimination on the basis of s*x, without KNOWING what s*x means?!

Omg, you can't make this crap up. Seriously.

[GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE @GOP_is_Gutless]

🚨 MAJOR Supreme Court Victory for Parents! 6-3 Ruling

Parents now have the constitutional right to opt their children out of LGBTQ+ curriculum and activities that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs.

This landmark decision affirms parental rights over government schools and delivers a huge blow to forced ideological indoctrination in classrooms.

Voted FOR Parents’ Rights:

• Chief Justice John Roberts
• Clarence Thomas
• Samuel Alito
• Neil Gorsuch
• Brett Kavanaugh
• Amy Coney Barrett

Dissent (Voted Against):

• Sonia Sotomayor
• Elena Kagan
• Ketanji Brown Jackson

Parents > Government bureaucrats.

This is a WIN for families.
What do you think? 👇
#SCOTUS #ParentalRights #ParentalVictory #Education

[Bartholomew Templefree @BTemplefree]

@TYLER_4x4 @NDFootball Wish they's stop slow playing you while they wait for Brayeen Parks. Obviously, you want to be a part of ND, that's more important than a couple of recruiting rankings.

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

Ian Roberts, the former illegal alien Superintendent of @DMschools, who was sentenced to 2 years for falsely claiming to be a US citizen and illegally possessing a firearm, gave an interview to @KCCINews FROM JAIL.

During the interview, Roberts claims his decision to flee from ICE was "NOT an attempt to evade law enforcement" while suggesting that ICE is racist for targeting "someone who looks like me."

He then LIES, claiming that he "legally" possessed firearms despite being CONVICTED of illegally possessing multiple firearms.

This guy can't get deported fast enough.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Complete silence from the BBC on our rape gang inquiry report.

A truly despicable organisation.

[Matt Morse @MattMorseTV]

Liberal women don't even say anything, they just look at you like this and expect you to allow Western civilization to collapse.

[Michelle Dewberry @MichelleDewbs]

🚨BREAKING

The scum who orally raped this precious little baby boy to death, has just been sentenced.

Jamie Varley has been given a WHOLE LIFE ORDER. He will stay in prison until the day he dies.

This is despite Varley’s KC arguing that these sentences should only be for “exceptionally serious cases” and suggesting that factors in this case should instead mean a sentence short of that.

He went on to clarify that the ‘factors’ he was referring to, was that Varley did not have an "outright intent to kill" but instead a sexual motive….

Jamie Varley has previously said “I’m going to hell”.

Yes Jamie, yes you are and that can’t come soon enough. In the meantime, I hope every remaining day of your sick existence is made to be literal hell on earth.

RIP dear Preston Davey. You can forever play in heaven now baby boy and nobody will ever be able to hurt you again. My sister will give you a big hug from me👼🏼🙏🏻💔

[0HOUR1 @__0HOUR1_]

Remember, a judge revoked bail based on social media posts today.

That's a social credit score.

It's begun.

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

Not a single post about the grooming gangs from anybody who was yelling about the Epstein files being released.

That should tell you everything you need to know.

[James Woods @RealJamesWoods]

She joined her friends on the lake to see the northern lights. An illegal alien, released by Chicago Democrats, not once, but twice, shot her in the back.
She bled to death on the concrete.

Democrats are a cancer.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 JUST IN: After the UK r*pe gangs report, Rep. Brandon Gill says America MUST repel the barbaric Islamist culture

"This is something that if we don't stop now, it's going to be my daughter and daughters across the country who are going to be going to public schools wearing burkas!"

"NOT all cultures are equal!"

"And that's the kind of stuff that we want to stop. We want to recognize that our job is to protect and preserve, conserve as conservatives."

"We should want to conserve the America that we got to grow up in."

"And you do not do that by bringing in cultures who have very different ideas about freedom of speech, religion, separation of church and state, the dignity of women, the role of women in public life, who have very different conceptions about how Muslims and non-Muslims interact. And those different ideas matter. And this is a good example of that!" @RepBrandonGill @willcain

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Stop calling them ‘Asian’ ‘grooming gangs’.

They are not Japanese.

Call them what they are.

Predominately Pakistani Muslim rape gangs.

[Homeland Security @DHSgov]

“We have one group that we broke up that these young ladies are claiming they were raped 600-700 times…We have one that we just broke up recently that was a ring of people that had kept these kids down in a tunnel. You couldn’t write a horror story about how bad this was, couldn’t write a horror story. It’s stuff that I’ll never forget.” —@SecMullinDHS on saving missing migrant children smuggled in under the Biden Administration