BYU Law Review

The BYU Law Review is the preeminent legal publication of the J. Reuben Clark Law School and is edited and published entirely by BYU Law students.

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

@X @UVALaw Really sorry for tagging @X in this. It was supposed to be a placeholder until we found Prof. Harrison's Twitter handle.

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Harrison (@x of @UVALaw) argues that remand without vacatur rests on a mistaken premise. In his article, he uncovers the implicit and undefended assumption of the ab initio validity of this doctrine. https://t.co/WvEc2FgR99

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Welcome to the new editors of Volume 49. We are very excited for this year!

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Editor-in-training does not refer to Mr. Bird but to baby Bird.

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

We are very excited about our Volume 49 Editor in Chief: Brooklyn Bird and her editor-in-training.

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

As Volume 48 wraps up, thank you to all the students who contributed to this volume and helped make this issue great and this year wonderful. We wish you well in your upcoming legal career.

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Our very own Mr. Anderson (of @BYULaw) makes a case for how grantor trust rules should be reformed by proposing grandfathering provisions that should be included in the reform of the grantor trust rules to ensure . . . https://t.co/CwgaG9sACt

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Our very own Mr. Allred (@allredWyatt of @BYULaw) argues that recent major questions doctrine decisions have departed from textualist principles. https://t.co/hQl1HA3z8n

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Tidmarsh and Marumo (of @NDLaw) use two recent decisions—one prohibiting incentive awards to class representatives and one permitting disgorgement of side payments to class objectors—to explore deeper connections between class-action settlements. . . https://t.co/Xh2nEw9NDi

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Mr. Lindley (@tylerblindley of @BYULaw) provides a coherent justification for the puzzling law of mootness exceptions within the constitutional model. https://t.co/lT86GvURCN

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Ferzan (@KimFerzan of @PennLaw), in “The Trouble with Time Served,” illustrates how crediting detainees for time served is perverse because it harms the innocent. https://t.co/HmAc7ovhHm

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

We’re excited to announce the final issue of volume 48 is live on our website. Thank you to all the scholars who contributed and the students who edited this issue. https://t.co/rRmSOy9bqK

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Minos’ (of @Harvard_Law) recent address as the Bruce C. Hafen Lecture at BYU Law School questions whether the law’s role in conflicts over religious and equal treatment is a wall or a bridge. https://t.co/TDluRqBMVz

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Kolenc (@TonyKolenc of @AveMariaLaw) explores a juror’s right to religious liberty by analyzing the prosecution of Democrat Congresswoman Corrine Brown in Northeast Florida. https://t.co/uQfJU5aW0N

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Heyman (of @ChicagoKentLaw) inquires into what founding-era Americans thought when incorporating the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to explore the place of religion within a liberal constitutional order. https://t.co/n82AElkzFn

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

We’re excited to announce that Vol. 48, Issue 5 is now live on our website! Thank you to the scholars who contributed and the students who edited this issue. https://t.co/rRmSOy9bqK

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

BYU Law recent graduate Abigail Stone argues that bankruptcy courts should consider mental health when determining whether student loans constitute an undue hardship . . .
https://t.co/jJSGViCLRo

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Rose analyzes recent legal adaptations in sovereign wealth that attempt to manage a more mercantilist and nationalistic orientation from sovereign funds. He outlines a framework for the legal innovations necessary . . .
https://t.co/66euBi0398

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Lee (@jonleelawprof) takes a comprehensive look at private sanctions in the legal profession by analyzing an original empirical study conducted throughout the country over the last 20 years. He concludes that . . .
https://t.co/T73rTQzoOF

[BYU Law Review @BYULRev]

Prof. Griffin (@CalebNGriffin) notes that modern contracts are meaningless because individuals must agree to them if they wish to participate in the modern world. He seeks to revitalize the contracting process by . . .
https://t.co/gjBvzc9xrw