“They come here for a better life”.
I don’t care, I physically couldn’t give a flying fuck. I want a better life for my children without them in it, and that’s way more important.
@ShaneAKAProp@James4467613528@EssexPR You have 63 year olds arguing with an 8 year old on a topic that 8 year old has no clue about.
ID for social media would also be a choice. If you want to use social media, ID yourself, if not, don’t use it simple as.
There is no choice with digital ID tho. It’s being enforced
@ShaneAKAProp@James4467613528@EssexPR I don’t think digital ID is necessary. All this “beneficial” stuff is just what they’re trying to sell people to actually accept it.
However you do make a good point about social media. I think social media absolutely needs ID verification.
1/2
@SalehAlrebdi2@LizaRosen0000 Britain should never be interested in other countries affairs. Just because you don’t support one side doesn’t mean you support the other. We shouldn’t be catering to any of them. We should think about our own first and when we’re good, then we can help other people
@DeniseTross@AJBNOFOSHOW@antmiddleton Those are separate problems tho, the most important thing right now is illegal migration. Solve that and a lot of the other problems will sort themselves
@AJBNOFOSHOW@DeniseTross@antmiddleton Exactly this, on sky news last night they mentioned that France has had Digital ID for years. Look at France tho, one of the worst for illegal immigration so these ID’s are useless for what they say it’s for.
Digital ID’s won’t stop the boats nor will it stop them raping kids
Digital ID for every adult is not progress. It is the end of a free society dressed up as convenience.
I am a cyber security specialist. This is my take.
They are selling it as a fix for illegal migration. That is bollocks.
We spend hundreds of billions a year on cyber security and yet the volume of breaches is breaking records. The threat is growing faster than the spend.
Digital ID will not stop boats. It will not stop trafficking gangs. It will not fix a broken border.
Criminals will work around it.
Honest citizens will pay the price.
It builds giant data banks that track where you go, what you buy, what you read and who you speak to.
It links your identity to every checkpoint in daily life.
One breach and your life is exposed.
Look at Jaguar Land Rover and the airports in recent weeks. Now imagine that at national scale on an ID system tied to everything you need to live your daily life.
Here is the risk that ministers will not admit.
Ransomware seeded through a supplier or an insider:
It lies quiet for months. It rolls through the backups. On trigger day the register and the recovery sets are both encrypted.
Payments fail. Health and benefits stall. Borders slow. Citizens are frozen out until a ransom is paid or the state rebuilds from scratch.
Centralise identity and you centralise failure.
Do not fall for the pitch.
Function creep is certain. It starts as login.
It becomes access to money, travel, speech and public services.
It turns rights into permissions controlled by the state and its contractors.
It creates a single point of failure for criminals, insiders and hostile states to target.
It will punish the elderly, the poor and anyone who is not always online.
It will centralise risk and outsource blame.
It will not stop fraud.
It will not stop illegal migration.
It will build the machinery for a social credit system by stealth.
If ministers cared about the border, they would enforce current laws, resource patrols and processing, close loopholes and remove those with no right to stay.
You do not need a national ID to do any of that.
We scrapped ID cards in 2010 for a reason.
Britain does not need a central register to prove age or status.
Yes to privacy first proofs. No to a database state.
Nigel Farage on Digital I.Ds…
‘It’s a BLAIRITE idea I’m sure Tony Blair would like to have us all microchipped’
‘No I don’t support it, I don’t trust big government’
Well said Nigel and I think we all AGREE! 👏👍
@GBNEWS Birth certificates, national insurance numbers, driving licenses, passports, even national identity cards all available in the UK. The only thing that will tackle illegal migration is not letting it happen in the first place. Close the borders.
@grok@basilthegreat What does she mean by “where people choose to put themselves before those councils” because I interpret it as she opened with something relatable so that people would listen. And the next bit she’s advocating for sharia councils. Which if accepted in parliament could be close to
@grok@basilthegreat Give a breakdown of what she said in this clip, explain to me what she means. A lot of confusion wether she is arguing for sharia law or not