Backlot OPS™

[Mason Lemme @LemmeReact]

Dear Turning Point USA @TPUSA @MrsErikaKirk

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@paramounttactcl Blocked further investigation? That we haven't been assured there was No foreign influence in the attempt on Trump in Butler or Kirk's case troubles me.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO Debate.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@Drmk5888 @HadynWood @RealCandaceO @BlakeBednarz That camera position, depending on lens, would have a potential medium wide shot (seated: CK's head to toe) up to an extreme close up. Few ask this question. 👍👍

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@RealCandaceO Why is this video shot in portrait and is a handheld recording of a monitor screen? Where is the original file? Why have we not seen the footage from the camera positioned a few feet in front of & to CK's left?

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

Lori's llc was set up to benefit from directly or setting up/positioning for another business/individual(s) that were most likely taking advantage of how Government contacts are awarded to Women or Minority owned businesses. There are many stories related to abuses of these set asides in that time period.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@RealCandaceO Interesting that there is no crew listed. More interesting perhaps is who directed it and what he's directed in the past.
https://t.co/DbftsJveSc

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

There is no police report or FBI document that confirms Trump reported Epstein. Journalists or Propagandists?

Applying common sense to the historical record, there is a clear distinction between current narratives and actual documentation from that 2000–2018 period.

If you look at the archives from those 18 years, you will find a total absence of any mention that Donald Trump "reported" Jeffrey Epstein or even that he had kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago for moral reasons. In fact, the evidence from that time often suggests the opposite.

1. The 2000–2018 Documentation Gap

There is no news article, police report, or public statement from Donald Trump between 2000 and 2018 that claims he reported Epstein to law enforcement.

 * The 2002 Quote: In a famous 2002 profile for New York Magazine, Trump was quoted saying:

   > "I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."

   > 

 * The 2005–2008 Investigation: During the original Palm Beach investigation that led to Epstein’s first plea deal, Trump’s name appeared on Epstein’s message pads and in flight logs, but there was no reporting at the time that Trump had aided the police.

 * The 2004–2007 "Expulsion": While Trump now claims he kicked Epstein out during this window, this was not reported in the news at the time. It only became a public talking point in 2019, after Epstein’s final arrest, when Trump’s team needed to explain their past association.

2. The Origin of the "Reported Him" Claim

The claim Alex Jones is making refers to a specific detail revealed only very recently (Feb 10, 2026) in the "Epstein Files":

 * The July 2006 Phone Call: Former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter told the FBI in 2019 that Trump called him in 2006 to say "everyone has known he's been doing this."

 * The Problem with the Claim: This call happened after the police had already investigated, raided Epstein’s home, and made the case public. In common-sense terms, calling the police to say "good job" after they catch a criminal is not the same as "reporting" a crime to start an investigation.

3. Comparing the Stories

| Era | Trump's Public Stance | Documentation |

|---|---|---|

| 2002 | "Terrific guy... likes them on the younger side." | New York Magazine |

| 2006 | (Private) "Everyone knew... focus on Maxwell." | FBI Interview (Revealed 2026) |

| 2019 | "I had no idea... I wasn't a fan." | White House Press Pool |

| 2025 | "I kicked him out for stealing my spa workers." | Air Force One Interview |

The "Common Sense" Verdict

If Trump had actually "reported" the most notorious predator in Florida history in the early 2000s, it would have been a massive news story—either then or during his 2016 campaign. Instead:

 * No police report exists. The DOJ confirmed today (February 10, 2026) that they have no corroborating evidence of a formal report from Trump.

 * No one mentioned it for 15 years. Not even Trump himself mentioned "reporting" Epstein during the 2016 election when his past associations were under heavy fire.

 * The reason keeps shifting. Moving the reason for the ban from "inappropriate behavior" (2019 claim) to "stolen spa workers" (2025 claim) suggests the fallout was a personal or business grievance rather than a law enforcement tip-off.

Conclusion: The claim that "everybody has known" Trump reported Epstein is a modern rewrite of history. While he may have had a falling out with Epstein and made a supportive phone call to a police chief in 2006, there is no documentation from the 2000–2018 era to support the idea that he acted as a whistleblower or reported Epstein’s crimes to the authorities

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

Applying common sense to the historical record, there is a clear distinction between current narratives and actual documentation from that 2000–2018 period.
If you look at the archives from those 18 years, you will find a total absence of any mention that Donald Trump "reported" Jeffrey Epstein or even that he had kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago for moral reasons. In fact, the evidence from that time often suggests the opposite.
1. The 2000–2018 Documentation Gap
There is no news article, police report, or public statement from Donald Trump between 2000 and 2018 that claims he reported Epstein to law enforcement.
* The 2002 Quote: In a famous 2002 profile for New York Magazine, Trump was quoted saying:
> "I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
>
* The 2005–2008 Investigation: During the original Palm Beach investigation that led to Epstein’s first plea deal, Trump’s name appeared on Epstein’s message pads and in flight logs, but there was no reporting at the time that Trump had aided the police.
* The 2004–2007 "Expulsion": While Trump now claims he kicked Epstein out during this window, this was not reported in the news at the time. It only became a public talking point in 2019, after Epstein’s final arrest, when Trump’s team needed to explain their past association.
2. The Origin of the "Reported Him" Claim
The claim Alex Jones is making refers to a specific detail revealed only very recently (Feb 10, 2026) in the "Epstein Files":
* The July 2006 Phone Call: Former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter told the FBI in 2019 that Trump called him in 2006 to say "everyone has known he's been doing this."
* The Problem with the Claim: This call happened after the police had already investigated, raided Epstein’s home, and made the case public. In common-sense terms, calling the police to say "good job" after they catch a criminal is not the same as "reporting" a crime to start an investigation.
3. Comparing the Stories
| Era | Trump's Public Stance | Documentation |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | "Terrific guy... likes them on the younger side." | New York Magazine |
| 2006 | (Private) "Everyone knew... focus on Maxwell." | FBI Interview (Revealed 2026) |
| 2019 | "I had no idea... I wasn't a fan." | White House Press Pool |
| 2025 | "I kicked him out for stealing my spa workers." | Air Force One Interview |
The "Common Sense" Verdict
If Trump had actually "reported" the most notorious predator in Florida history in the early 2000s, it would have been a massive news story—either then or during his 2016 campaign. Instead:
* No police report exists. The DOJ confirmed today (February 10, 2026) that they have no corroborating evidence of a formal report from Trump.
* No one mentioned it for 15 years. Not even Trump himself mentioned "reporting" Epstein during the 2016 election when his past associations were under heavy fire.
* The reason keeps shifting. Moving the reason for the ban from "inappropriate behavior" (2019 claim) to "stolen spa workers" (2025 claim) suggests the fallout was a personal or business grievance rather than a law enforcement tip-off.
Conclusion: The claim that "everybody has known" Trump reported Epstein is a modern rewrite of history. While he may have had a falling out with Epstein and made a supportive phone call to a police chief in 2006, there is no documentation from the 2000–2018 era to support the idea that he acted as a whistleblower or reported Epstein’s crimes to the authorities.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

A thorough review of available public records, court documents, and official statements reveals **no credible evidence** that Donald Trump has actively cooperated with authorities, provided information, served as a witness, or otherwise assisted in investigations related to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities or allegations against him.

Publicly released Epstein-related files from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), FBI records, and court proceedings primarily document Trump's social and professional association with Epstein from the late 1980s through the early 2000s, including shared social circles in Palm Beach and documented flights on Epstein's aircraft during the 1990s. These materials include mentions of Trump in Epstein's contacts, emails, and flight logs, but they do not indicate any formal cooperation on Trump's part with law enforcement.

Key points from the records include:

- Trump's name appears frequently in recently released Epstein documents (e.g., over 1,000 mentions in some tranches released in 2026), often in news articles shared by Epstein, flight logs, or unverified tips to the FBI. The DOJ has stated that certain allegations against Trump in these files are "untrue and sensationalist," and no credible evidence of wrongdoing by Trump has been substantiated in connection with Epstein's crimes.

- No official documents, such as FBI reports, grand jury transcripts, or prosecutorial notes, describe Trump providing testimony, statements, or investigative assistance in Epstein's 2006–2008 Florida case, the 2019 federal sex trafficking charges, or related Ghislaine Maxwell proceedings.

- Claims of cooperation sometimes circulate in public discourse, but they lack support in primary sources. For instance, no records confirm Trump as a cooperating witness or informant.

Regarding the 2008 Florida plea deal (handled by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta), Acosta later served in the Trump administration, and an anonymous sourcing claim (later disputed) suggested Acosta was told Epstein "belonged to intelligence." However, official reviews (including a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility report) found no evidence Epstein was an intelligence asset or cooperating witness, and Acosta denied such claims.

Recent releases, including those prompted by the Epstein Files Transparency Act (signed into law in 2025), have made millions of pages available via the DOJ website, including grand jury materials from Florida. These focus on Epstein's network but contain no references to Trump's cooperation.

For primary sources and further review:

- DOJ Epstein files repository: https://t.co/sKmnpevHBg (hosts released documents, including investigative summaries, emails, and related materials).
- FBI Vault (Jeffrey Epstein section): https://t.co/EPAyKs11TI (publicly accessible investigative records).
- CourtListener or PACER for related civil and criminal dockets (e.g., Southern District of Florida and New York cases involving Epstein and Maxwell).

If specific documents or claims are of interest, additional clarification would allow for more targeted examination.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@paramounttactcl @ShawnRyan762 Hey G, was keeping my eye out over the weekend for the premiere, but when does your interview with Brian Harpole drop?

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

Here's the continuatipn->
* They have neglected the public education system, allowing disparities in resources and opportunities to persist, limiting the potential of all citizens.
* They have expanded surveillance powers and infringed upon the privacy of citizens, eroding fundamental liberties under the guise of security.
* They have failed to provide a secure and humane immigration system, resulting in the mistreatment of vulnerable individuals and a failure to address the root causes of migration.
* They have fostered discourse that undermines civil dialogue and national unity, contributing to division among the citizenry.
* They have imposed excessive regulatory burdens that stifle individual enterprise and innovation, undermining economic liberty and opportunity.
* They have neglected to address the growing concentration of wealth and economic opportunities, leaving many without a path to prosperity.
* They have failed to protect the right to free expression, allowing restrictions that chill open discourse and limit the free exchange of ideas.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Government whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the People of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these States, solemnly publish and declare, That these United States are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the oppressive practices and policies herein detailed, and that all political connection between them and the current destructive governance, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to implement equitable and just laws, to protect the rights of all their inhabitants, to engage in responsible global cooperation, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@elonmusk @IanCarrollShow @ggreenwald #AmericanParty

The Unanimous Declaration of the Peoples of the United States of America
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for a people to re-examine the foundations of their governance and to assert their inherent rights, a decent respect to the opinions of humankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to such a re-evaluation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all individuals are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Well-being. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among People, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Such has been the patient sufferance of these States; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to re-assert these principles. The history of the current Government, and indeed, of successive administrations and legislative bodies, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
* The Government has refused its assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good, particularly those addressing environmental crises, systemic inequality, and economic opportunity.
* They have obstructed the Administration of Justice, by undermining independent institutions, questioning judicial impartiality, and politicizing law enforcement.
* They have endeavored to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power, through the deployment of armed forces against peaceful civilian protests and the blurring of lines between military and domestic law enforcement roles.
* They have imposed policies that disproportionately harm marginalized communities, perpetuating disparities in opportunity based on race, gender, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status.
* They have failed to address the spread of misinformation, undermining public trust in shared facts and eroding the foundation of informed democratic discourse.
* They have allowed the undue influence of special interests and corporate power to corrupt the legislative process, prioritizing private gain over the well-being of the populace.
* They have neglected to ensure accessible and affordable healthcare, leaving millions vulnerable and without adequate support.
* They have undermined the integrity of democratic processes, including through practices that hinder equitable access to voting and erode confidence in free and fair elections.
* They have failed to balance environmental stewardship with economic and social needs, jeopardizing the sustainability of our planet for future generations.
* They have failed to address the balance between individual rights and public safety, contributing to widespread insecurity and loss of life.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

They have neglected the public education system, allowing disparities in resources and opportunities to persist, limiting the potential of all citizens.They have expanded surveillance powers and infringed upon the privacy of citizens, eroding fundamental liberties under the guise of security.They have failed to provide a secure and humane immigration system, resulting in the mistreatment of vulnerable individuals and a failure to address the root causes of migration.They have fostered discourse that undermines civil dialogue and national unity, contributing to division among the citizenry.They have imposed excessive regulatory burdens that stifle individual enterprise and innovation, undermining economic liberty and opportunity.They have neglected to address the growing concentration of wealth and economic opportunities, leaving many without a path to prosperity.They have failed to protect the right to free expression, allowing restrictions that chill open discourse and limit the free exchange of https://t.co/qAXpvGgDkb every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Government whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.We, therefore, the People of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these States, solemnly publish and declare, That these United States are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the oppressive practices and policies herein detailed, and that all political connection between them and the current destructive governance, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to implement equitable and just laws, to protect the rights of all their inhabitants, to engage in responsible global cooperation, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

The Unanimous Declaration of the Peoples of the United States of AmericaWhen, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for a people to re-examine the foundations of their governance and to assert their inherent rights, a decent respect to the opinions of humankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to such a re-evaluation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all individuals are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Well-being. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among People, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.Such has been the patient sufferance of these States; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to re-assert these principles. The history of the current Government, and indeed, of successive administrations and legislative bodies, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.The Government has refused its assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good, particularly those addressing environmental crises, systemic inequality, and economic opportunity.They have obstructed the Administration of Justice, by undermining independent institutions, questioning judicial impartiality, and politicizing law enforcement.They have endeavored to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power, through the deployment of armed forces against peaceful civilian protests and the blurring of lines between military and domestic law enforcement roles.They have imposed policies that disproportionately harm marginalized communities, perpetuating disparities in opportunity based on race, gender, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status.They have failed to address the spread of misinformation, undermining public trust in shared facts and eroding the foundation of informed democratic discourse.They have allowed the undue influence of special interests and corporate power to corrupt the legislative process, prioritizing private gain over the well-being of the populace.They have neglected to ensure accessible and affordable healthcare, leaving millions vulnerable and without adequate support.They have undermined the integrity of democratic processes, including through practices that hinder equitable access to voting and erode confidence in free and fair elections.They have failed to balance environmental stewardship with economic and social needs, jeopardizing the sustainability of our planet for future generations.They have failed to address the balance between individual rights and public safety, contributing to widespread insecurity and loss of life.

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@daniel7te @PeterSchiff @elonmusk That there is some truth to the teetering, I agree

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@douglaskarr @PeterSchiff @elonmusk Agree

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@PeterSchiff @elonmusk Most appealing aspect of the idea is it starts a new Political Party that appeals to the Majority of U.S. many positives to the libertarian party but ...

[Backlot OPS™ @BacklotOPS]

@elonmusk I'm in. Let's get it started, right here, Right Now.