@jkarpsportsfan1 Def bias. How can you not love a scrappy ball player that can hit, run, throw and also play GG defense? All the kid wants to do is win and you can see it.
@BillKrackman@bostonred88 and @BillKrackman thanks a bunch for doing this pod as it’s both entertaining and very informative! It’s much appreciated and was great seeing you both at the meet-up! -Chicago Dave
@BillKrackman Alan I always wondered when doing your ratings…example you rate Michigan at 104 and then maybe Uconn was say 99. How do those ratings correlate to the spread exactly? 104-99 means they are 5 points per game better on average? Curious to how # is created? Thanks! -Chicago Dave
I strongly disagree. I've been requesting deci-cents on golf for a long time.
Deci-cents hurts top-down market makers and rewards better pricing. The game is no longer about queue position on something a square 6th grader could price because it's trading at 1c/2c.
On live, yeah, it probably hurts margins for MMs pulling odds from sportsbooks. Aside from the courtsiding issue, it's very easy to price something at -9900/+4900. It's just speed and queue management. Short term maybe liquidity dips, but long run you get more competitive prices. You say recs don't care about price but a rec does care about 499/1 instead of 99/1.
And your argument about taking being harder is easily solved via a configurable "slippage" feature that many orderbooks already have. If done right, it should feel no different to recs.
I'll be more active in live MM now that more than 5% of the field is tradeable and the competition is about having better prices, not being first in queue at 98c laying a golfer DraftKings has at 80/1.
Also, 40 million contracts sounds like a lot, but when most of that volume is taking at 1c, actual bet volume from takers is much smaller than other markets trading 40 mill.