@Georg_Pazderski His own fault of course. Hard to feel bad when he spends his last moments attacking a white man for being white and literally killing himself
@SWPatriot1NYS@DylanByers I’m more based than you. CBS sucks but so does Bari Weiss. She is a libtard moderate.
Also I am vindicated by the fact that the trans looking fella named McSev doesn’t have the courage to hear feedback and blocked me. Typical they/thems
@BessetteKeith@LPNH However this correlation can be due to either (1) people are not considering gayness bad as a whole voting block and that view is cohesive, or (2) they view gayness as good in the same cohesive way.
I forget the math for correlation tbh but it can show the same thing too.
@BessetteKeith@LPNH Correlation between candidates in same election year but for different offices. This correlation is created by causation though (the one that OP highlighted).
A = gay pres, B = gay secretary. P(A|B) > P (A). Ergo these events are not independent.
@Michael_Druggan@FritzTheDev You owning “zero equity” is not really you owning zero equity. You are the 100% owner of the property. There is just a loan with a lien. You still own 100% of the equity but it nets to $0. You have 100% exposure to the value of the home.
@BessetteKeith@LPNH You need to evaluate for potential and qualified candidates first. Gay people tend to over achieve so they are likely to run.
Also look for correlation. The marginal probability that a second gay is elected is higher than the probability that the first is. Partially your point.