DonaldRay Baer

Runner, hiker, scientist, mystery reader

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

@eray_aydil @AVS_Members @AvsAld @avs_ssd @AvsPlasma @AvsCdg For me there are generally three parts to doing a review and they each can take an hour. 1 Scanning and reading the paper getting major impressions. 2 work through the paper again turning notes into useful comments. 3 review comments for consistency and message, often a day later

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

@astrogin Congratulations Sally!

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

@WashAcad Although this dialogue is focused on one community, the topic and issues are relevant to all of us.

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

@WarwickXPS @eray_aydil Hope it is helpful!

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

@UH_ChBE @eray_aydil @nyutandon Congratulations, adding more to your busy schedule?

[AVS @AVS_Members]

JVST A | Read Papers from the Special Collection: Reproducibility Challenges and Solution... @JVSTA https://t.co/OTvTBeO4HW

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

@ButlerKaycie Totally agree. If you don’t indicate the significance of your work on the field, what is the purpose of the paper.

[Dr. Marianne Aydil’s spouse Eray Aydil @eray_aydil]

Best proposal writing advice I received: “Make it easy to read.”

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

@SeleneA11465402 Interesting work. I was wondering about the C 1s fits. The pristine looks to be fit with two peaks, one highly asymmetric. Were the same peaks included when the O was present? Also does the O 1s signal match what you see with the carbon?

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

@AvvalTahereh PRE tells you if there is a difference. How do you assess the significance of the difference?

[DonaldRay Baer @BaerDonaldray]

This poster "Guides for making useful #XPS measurements" is part of a community effort to improve quality of published XPS data. #XPS published at @jvstab.
#AVSPosters2020 #AVS_Analytical #AVS_Labs
https://t.co/wTPp7vyyr9