@Franchise9494@matthew_sigel@Lazarus_Capital@vaneck_us@JanvanEck3 Was very close to making the same comment earlier today. Matt, a regarded professional not only keeps getting baited to reply, but actually manages to dumb down the convo further. Expected quite the opposite. I guess anyone can be a hotshot in finance these days.
"Why Does This Opportunity Exist?"
DIGITAL ASSETS: investors shun crypto.
Counter: Stock at discount to Helios value (ignoring crypto)
TECHNICAL: moved from TSE to Nasdaq in May 2025
Counter: Changing now (Russell 5/22, DC revs Q2 2026)
CASH FLOWS: negative FCF during Helios ramp
Counter: Phase I on time/budget. First hall delivered in April. Top tier GC (Clayco). Cash flows to start soon.
DURATION: Markets impatient
Counter: 2026 catalysts include (1) CRWV phase I delivery, (2) index add, (3) ERCOT batch 0, (4) additional DC sites, (5) phase II debt financing, and (6) hyperscaler deal
$GLXY
@Franchise9494 Cow, you are usually a beacon in the dark and have my respect. But please, relax, take a breather and really understand what you are about to post before doing so. This is a nothingburger really.
@CryptJynx@NicolasFlamelX During the last couple of months you have become very mentally unstable. You are obviously overinvested here aswell as having your reputation on the line having promoted the stock to friends convincing to buy. I would diversify if I were you. Or perhaps go back to work again.
@CryptJynx Trying to beat index always comes with volatility. I think any early $GLXY investors port looks like this. Alot of coulda woulda shoulda when it comes to profittaking in hindsight. Still 50% of port in this.
After running multiple valuation models on Galaxy Digital $GLXY, it stands out as one of the most compelling asymmetric bets across crypto and AI infra.
Price Targets December 2026:
๐ฅ Base case: $45
Current roadmap + flat Bitcoin
๐ฅ Upside case: $75
New customer for 830 MW capacity at Helios
๐ฅ Bull case: $100
Multi-campus expansion + BTC $100k
More info: https://t.co/aOkFfUSlev
Thereโs been a lot of recent discussion around ERCOTโs March 17 PGRR 145 comments.
The new 830 MW $GLXY project has a requested energization date in 2028, which based on a plain reading of ERCOTs March 17 PGRR 145 comments puts it into section 9.2.1.1(1)(e) with respect to eligibility as base load not subject to restudy in batch zero.
That specific section only requires (1) valid completed studies and (2) an attestation from the utility that an IA has been signed.
As a reminder, we announced our interconnection study completion on January 15, 2026 and we already executed a service agreement with our utility.
PGRR 145 is draft and could change from here, but nothing in it indicates a deferral.