FairyMaximusCigaris

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

This is shocking

Here’s a comparison of what the streets looked like in Johannesburg, South Africa, compared to what they like today in 2026…. WOW

There was a major political shift that happened during this time. The main turning point was the end of apartheid and the 1994 democratic elections, which transferred political power from White minority rule to Black majority rule under the African National Congress

What followed was a “financial doom loop” a collapse of the water, electricity, roads and infrastructure system as well as systemic corruption

[Janeway @janeway888]

Feb 2014 there was a violent Coup d'Etat in Ukraine w/a massacre in the main square of the capital, Kiev. 100 people were killed by snipers. "It was Barack Obama that ordered that massacre...those snipers were hired and paid by ERIC CIARAMELLA, under orders by Barack OBAMA."

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@TheProjectUnity In plain sight.

[Everett Stern @EverettStern1]

Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,

On October 14th I wrote to you about Bank of America @BankofAmerica.

You did not answer. 3.6 million Americans did.

I want to tell you what that looked like from where I sit, because I do not think Washington understands it yet. The messages did not come from one side. They came from Republicans and Democrats, from veterans and nurses and small business owners, from people who have not agreed with each other about anything in a decade. They all said a version of the same sentence. We have had enough.

That is what a national security issue looks like when it finally breaks through. It does not pick a party. It belongs to everyone who has a kid, a bank account, or a flag on the porch.

So let me be plain about my concern. I am worried that nothing is going to happen. The fine has been announced. The press cycle is already turning. In a few weeks the number will be forgotten and the bank will be back to business. I have watched this exact sequence play out before, and I am writing to you now, while there is still a window, because once that window closes it does not reopen.

I am also widening this letter, because Treasury does not act alone.

To the Department of Justice @TheJusticeDept and to FBI Director Kash Patel @FBIDirectorKash:

Director Patel, you were not in the chair when this happened, so I want you to hear it from me directly. In 2011 I walked into the FBI with everything I had on HSBC. Not a tip. Boxes. Names, account numbers, transaction records, internal emails. Agents worked that evidence for over a year. I trusted them, and I still believe they wanted to do their jobs.

Then the settlement was announced. $1.9 billion. I called the agents and asked the only question that mattered. When do you raid the building and when are the arrests?

Their answer was four words. Our hands are tied.

I have thought about those four words every day since. Not because the agents failed me. Because somebody above them decided that a bank was too important to treat like a defendant. That decision was made quietly, by people whose names I will never know, and it has been made again every time since. Director Patel, you now have the authority to make a different one.

I remember the words carved into the stone outside the federal building in Philadelphia the day I walked in to report @HSBC: justice is the defense of our liberty. I believed that. I still want to. But a justice system that handcuffs a dealer on the corner and sends a bank a bill is not defending anyone’s liberty. It is choosing whose liberty counts.

To Brian Moynihan, Chief Executive Officer of Bank of America @BankofAmerica:

Mr. Moynihan, your bank just agreed to pay $1.2 billion for failures that regulators called willful. I have a few questions, and the 3.6 million people reading this would like the answers too.

Who was fired?

Not reassigned. Not retired early with a package. Fired, by name, for the conduct the government described.

What has actually changed in your anti money laundering program? Not the budget line. Not the consultant’s slide deck. What is different today about how an alert gets cleared and who is allowed to say stop?

Were there any consequences inside the building at all? Or did this land the way it landed at HSBC bank, as a line item?

And how much is your bonus this year?

I ask because I know what it costs a compliance officer to raise his hand inside a bank like yours. I would like to know what it cost anyone at the top. Do you even care? I am asking sincerely. I would like to be wrong.

Here is what I did about all of this, and why it matters to this letter. After the government declined to help me or any of the whistleblowers I have met since, I built the thing I wished had existed. Tactical Rabbit is a private intelligence agency. We find the truth, we prove it, and we put it in the hands of people who will act on it. I made a decision a long time ago that if the government would not stop the next HSBC, I would.

So to anyone inside a bank reading this who is looking at something they know is wrong: if your bank will not act, and the government will not act, come to me. I will get the truth to the public. That is not a threat. It is a promise I have already kept once.

Mr. Secretary, Director Patel, the Department of Justice, and Mr. Moynihan: four addresses, one question. Will anyone be held accountable?

Not fined. Not suspended. Not asked to attend training. Accountable.

Please end the cycle of too big to jail. I will not stop until there is change, and neither will the millions of Americans standing behind this letter. Answer them.

We need a banker in jail.

Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder, Tactical Rabbit

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

USPS Employee Ethan Pease: "I'm not a Trump supporter. I'm not a Biden supporter either, but something profoundly wrong occurred in Wisconsin during the Presidential election and the American people have a right to know about it!"

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

Bill Gates financed the FIRST-EVER creation of 16 man-made viruses using AI.

The Gates-funded mad scientists used AI to design entire viral genomes and then physically manufactured them.

Now, he’s claiming the world faces imminent AI bioterror attacks—the VERY capability he helped fund into existence.

This demands an FBI investigation.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 BOOM: SPENCER PRATT JUST DROPPED THIS TRUTH NUKE

"[Ilhan Omar] — how about, F*CK you, get the f*ck out of here. If you think our history was built by losers...go to Mogadishu! You haven't built anything in your life!"

"Elon Musk BUILT SOMETHING. The most successful African American of all time, and people still call him a LOSER?" 🔥

Spot on.

Go MAKE SOMALIA GREAT AGAIN if America is so bad.

But they actually know we are so great which is why all they can do is STEAL from our taxpayer base in Minnesota!

Omar, meanwhile, called Musk "one of the dumbest people on earth." This is the guy who lands rockets and just flew a car over a Cybertruck.

While Ilhan trashes the people who built this country, a federal grand jury is subpoenaing her family over their immigration paperwork! 😅

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@maniaUFO Huh. Sleestack. 😆

[Glenn Beck @glennbeck]

If you bank at JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, U.S. Bank, Citibank, or Wells Fargo AND you're conservative. I would find a new place to put your money TODAY.

A federal regulator just found that America's biggest banks have been targeting conservatives. Some even flagged words like "MAGA" and "America First" as "reputational risks".

Where did the banks get that pressure to flag these words? Straight from the regulators in our government that watch over the banks.

While investigating Donald Trump, Jack Smith’s team collected personal records on over 639,000 Republican voters and donors. Home addresses, birth dates, credit card records... if you bought a MAGA hat or donated even $5, the federal government put your name on a spreadsheet. Big Tech tracks you, the Feds list you, and Big Banks flag you. It’s a complete surveillance apparatus targeted at one half of the country. Jack Smith needs to be held accountable. And so do these banks.

I bank with U.S. Bank. Today, I’m calling a Vice President there to ask one simple question: What are you doing to make sure your bank isn't feeding this weaponized system? If they can't prove their CEO is doing everything they can to fight this overreach, I’m pulling every single dime and moving it somewhere else.

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@KLXNWS Yeah. That other guy just ate ice cream and fell off his bike. 😆

[Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet @Tironianae]

🚨 BREAKING: 70 THOUSAND MONKS just NOMINATED President Trump for the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE 🚨

Trump stopped SEVEN global conflicts in SEVEN months… and now the EUROPEANS are buying “TRUMP 2028” HATS (Zelenskyy bought TWO) 🧢

Trump says he’s not ENDING the Ukraine War for awards, he just wants a TICKET to HEAVEN 🙏

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@TheProjectUnity Haha. Same..

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@bondurant_26083

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@Sassafrass_84 You are right, tho. 😆

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@PinoAmericano No contest.

[Tesla @Tesla]

Real life, baby

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@CMDRVALTHOR @doqholliday 😆 everyone i have ever told laughed. Who is laughing last?

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@cb_doge Well, I will not have the funds. Lol but yay for whoever does.

[ΛЯIΣᄂ @Prolotario1]

Someone Wanted Me To Expose Piers Morgan:

Let's 1st Understand One Thing

You need to understand what Piers Morgan actually is before you understand what he does. He is not a journalist. He is not an interviewer. He is not even a personality in the way the public understands personality. He is a placement agent for narrative laundering. His entire career is a single assignment: to sit in the most visible chair available and cleanse dirty assets with the appearance of scrutiny.

So What Exactly Is His Function?

His tactic is simple, and it works because the audience has been trained to mistake volume for courage. He screams at people. He interrupts. He postures as the indefatigable truth-seeker who asks the "tough questions." But the spectacle is a magic trick. The real questions never get asked. The screaming is the cover for the script. The confrontation is the alibi.

Nobody gets grilled on a Piers Morgan show unless the grilling serves the network's interests. And when a protected asset like Zelenskyy sits down, the "tough questions" are written by the same people who wrote Zelenskyy's talking points.

Why?

Because Piers Morgan has been a controlled asset for decades. His career is a latticework of editor positions at major tabloids, television networks, and media properties, each one owned by the exact financial class he claims to oppose. You do not get handed the editorship of an international tabloid at 29 years old because of talent alone. You get it because you are known to be dependable. You will run the stories you are told to run. You will kill the stories you are told to kill. And you will do it with such performative bluster that nobody notices the pattern.

Morgan's recent defense of Zelenskyy is not an act of conscience. It is a scheduled perception operation, executed with all the subtlety of a knee on a neck. The rollout is coordinated interviews highlighting Zelenskyy's "feelings of betrayal," his "emotional pain" over American politics, his "lonely fight against corruption." None of it is journalism. It's an image reconstruction campaign.

Here's The Tell:

The framework is always emotional, never forensic. A real interviewer following the money would ask about the DTRA documents. About the biolab records. About the former Ukrainian prosecutor who was fired for investigating corruption in the energy sector. About the cargo manifests moving through Odesa. About the offshore accounts and shell companies linked to the political class in Kyiv. About the disappearance of billions in Western "aid" into private hands.

A real journalist would ask about the adrenochrome logistics, the trafficking corridors, the organ brokerage networks that moved through Ukrainian territory for years.

Piers Morgan asks none of it. Instead, he asks about feelings. He asks about betrayal. He lets Zelenskyy weep on camera or perform the appearance of it because emotional theater is the smoke screen. The audience responds to the crying, not the cargo.

The performative vulnerability distracts from the forensic reality. And Piers knows exactly what he's doing. He has spent thirty years learning which emotional buttons to push to keep a conversation from ever becoming dangerous.

What did the London media do during the Epstein disclosures?

They ran the American imports and added nothing. Zero investigative energy on the British side of the network. Zero follow-up on the London banking. Zero on the properties, the tax structures, the charity fronts, the art transactions. The British press Morgan's press treated Epstein as a foreign story that happened to have a British prince attached. That omission is not an accident. It's an editorial decision made by people who knew the trail would lead home.

Morgan's silence on the British side of the Epstein network is louder than any interruption he's ever performed on camera. He knows where the bodies are buried metaphorically, and in at least one case, with a specificity that would make the hair on your neck stand up. The London blackmail economy was built on exactly this kind of shared knowledge: everyone holds everyone's video, so nobody talks.

We will dig more into him later.

@piersmorgan

[FairyMaximusCigaris @BarbSamuels1]

@PinoAmericano Same