Hey @BernieSanders -- I need your help.
Seriously. I have a student. Young man, just graduated, earned his welding certifications, 18 years old. Knows how to do real work, produce a real product, contribute something tangible to this country. Good kid.
His family kicked him out the day he graduated. Homeless. No safety net. Just his certs and whatever he could carry out the door.
Now, Senator, YOU are the guy I always hear talking about this. You have built your ENTIRE career on the idea that when someone has more than they need, and someone else has nothing, the people with excess have a moral obligation to help. Government redistribution. Take from those who have, give to those who are in need. You have said this for FORTY YEARS.
So I am coming to you. Sincerely. This kid needs a roof.
You own three houses, Senator. One in Burlington. One beachfront property in North Hero, Vermont. One in Washington, D.C.
He needs ONE.
You believe in this, right? This is literally the core of everything you preach. A skilled young man -- someone who will actually WORK, who actually PRODUCES something, unlike people whose career highlight is naming three post offices -- has nothing. And you have three properties sitting there.
So here is where I get a little confused, Senator.
See, I thought maybe you would just... hand him one. Lead by example. Be the change. But then I remembered you just spent $221,000 in a SINGLE QUARTER chartering a Bombardier Challenger 604 -- that is $15,000 AN HOUR -- to fly around the country on your "Fighting Oligarchy" tour. Because, as you so eloquently put it when asked about it: "You think I'm gonna be sitting on a waiting line at United?"
No apologies.
So let me make sure I have this right. The government should redistribute wealth to help people like my student -- but YOU personally, with three houses and a private jet habit, are too important to inconvenience yourself. Got it.
Quinn's Law Twenty-Five. Go look it up. I'll wait.
You are not a champion of the Proletariat, Senator. You are a SNOLLYGOSTER of the first order -- a cacafuego who has built a career selling a product he has never once used himself. A gascon. All promises, no precipitation. Cloud without rain for forty years running.
Socialism does not lift people out of poverty. It never has. What it DOES produce -- reliably, historically, every single time -- is people exactly like you. Three houses. Private jets. No apologies.
We call those people oligarchs, Senator. I believe you have used that word yourself. Recently. From a $15,000-an-hour airplane.
But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher whose student is sleeping on someone else's floor tonight while the self-appointed champion of the working class decides which of his three vacation homes to visit next.
IF you agree:
LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this.
COMMENT below -- Do you think Bernie is obligated to offer this kid a room? Tell me. 👇
JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.
@JoJoFromJerz@GuntherEagleman@catturd2
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
@PaulGoldEagle@leahwen@grok, please explain “The Admiralty System” mentioned in the above post? how it differs from laws under the U.S. Constitution? And if different, they why was “The Admiralty System” put in place?
SOLID Constitutional arguments against the SAVE Act, but how do you suggest we otherwise …
… Restore the sovereignty of the people when the People’s votes are cancelled by MILLIONS of illegal votes,
… Restore the authority of the States that was Constitutionally taken away be the 14th Amendment, and
... Restore elections to the counties when key counties are so corrupted that they over-ride all other counties.
Restoring the sovereignty of the people, the authority of the States, and the elections to the counties are virtuous, worthwhile, and Constitutional (albeit lofty) goals, but criticizing the efforts of others withOUT suggesting a practical alternative woN’T achieve those goals.
I’m not advocating for the SAVE Act, but something must be done to …
… “ensure that the voter is who he claims to be” per Jefferson,
… only count votes from “Citizens of their States” per Adams, and
… compel “Congress [to] intervene [when] the States fail” per Madison.
As such, what do you suggest as a practical alternative to the SAVE Act for addressing the concerns of Jefferson, Adams and Madison?
This chart begs wondering if the real motivation behind Klaus von Shyster and Ursula von der Liar endlessly pushing #GlobalWarming / #ClimateChange was because they know the EU (nor anyone else for that matter) can compete with the USA on merit, so they try to guilt us into over-regulating ourselves.