@JohnSpeakman4@StevenMBelknap@NatMetabolism Come back when you actually understand basic metabolism, basic physics, and actual objective reality. As long as you want to toss around invalid constructs, you're wasting everyone's time. Goodness me !!! LMAO.
@JohnSpeakman4@StevenMBelknap@NatMetabolism Oh, bless... That is hilarious! You're laboring under the illusions that (a) indirect calorimetry is valid, (b) that direct calorimetry is valid either as an energy assessment, and (c) that the human body runs on 'calories'., or on 'energy' ...Absolutely hilarious. We're done.
@JohnSpeakman4@NatMetabolism I lied about finality... The error in assessment of 'energy expenditure' is wider than the total difference your so called 'signal' describes. ergo, your result is utterly meaningless, and you are in fact totally deluded and kidding only yourself and a few peer reviewers.
@JohnSpeakman4@NatMetabolism Furthermore, whether or not 6% (if you were able to report that from ACTUAL OBSERVATIONS rather than a fantasy) is actually trivial or otherwise is an interpretation. Do you even understand the difference between statistical significance and clinical utility? Looks like you don't
@JohnSpeakman4@NatMetabolism Finally, 'a degree' does not make one 'competent', and neither does membership to a self claimed 'authority' . Competence is established and confirmed in actual practice. Having read your paper, I'm going to stick with my original (actually competent) assessment.
@DrKristieLeong You don't get to refuse to take heed of a bona fide expert such as myself, and rudely claim I'm not one (without even fucking looking at the literature), and then demand 'references'... I could write a thesis on why most people should NOT plank... oh yes... I fucking did.
@TrustMe1955@j_t_2390@drmatthewnagra What qualifies you, child, to comment AT ALL on the veracity or merit of anything I have had to say, you rude fuck? How many years as a lecturer have you worked? How many peer reviewed publications have you authored? How many multi-million dollar consults have you completed?
@DrKristieLeong I don't care what you believe. Maybe do a basic search you rude girl. You will find my name staring back at you as first author on a long list of publications in exerciser physiology (among other topics actually)...
@DrKristieLeong I have contributed to "the science", significantly - as an independent researcher, you rude arrogant girl. Safe and effective exercise is a good thing, planks are not in that category. I couldn't give a shit what any self-claimed 'authority' says. Pull your head in.
@DrKristieLeong I need no refresher, you rude insolent person. I am a bone fide expert in exercise physiology. I am a well published research scientist in this field, I have completed a number of multi million dollar consultancies to major professional organizations, I have taught post graduates
@TrustMe1955@j_t_2390@drmatthewnagra No, child.. I'm full of valid knowledge and experience in my fields, and my intellectual and vastly sensible followers know and respect that. You on the other hand are a turd, and an irrelevant nobody turd... not to mention stupid as fuck. Bore off.
@DrKristieLeong I am an exercise physiologist first and foremost. I am absolutely NOT out of my depth AT ALl. Writing a blog is not a qualification. The advice to plank is poor and contraindicated. Period. The fact you don't know why is all we need to know about you.
@DrKristieLeong Which one of us is an exercise physiologist? Isometric exercise is contraindicated for vastly more people than dynamic. You are NOT qualified to give advice on exercise, so knock it off.
@TrustMe1955@j_t_2390@drmatthewnagra I am not required, neither do I have any intention of 'proving' anything about my academic history, employment record, academic rank, titles or anything else. These are all a matter of fact and of record. The fact that most plant munching cock suckers cant find it is on them. lol