A lot of conservative commentators and pastors attempt to carve out a safe path through the gender discourse by claiming that any bad behavior from women is ultimately a failure of male leadership
The power of this argument is that it's true, in healthy patriarchal societies the male head of the house was responsible for the behavior of his wife and daughters, but the reason is they were not considered to have full agency so the male head was granted authority over them
If a women defied her husband, society sided against her, if a daughter spurned her father she was looked down upon as disgraceful, the man had the responsibility to lead but the women had the responsibility to follow
The modern conservative solution has been to assign all the responsibility to men without granting them any authority, they are just supposed to lead without any social reinforcement or lawful authority
Men are taught that they should lead, but women are not taught that they should follow
Men are taught they're responsible for everything, even things they can't control because society stripped them of that authority, but women are told that they're never responsible for anything even when society has given them all the authority
We can see this reflected in the Lindsay Clancy case, but honestly we can see it reflected in most pulpits and conservative podcasts just as clearly
The two sexes must get along, no one should be stoking gender wars for clicks or attention, the future of our society depends on this
But it also depends on conservatives deciding what they really believe about gender diffrences
Are women the same as men from the neck up, with the same level of agency and responsibility?
Or are men and women different beyond their sex organs? Are men really responsible for the behavior of women?
We have to choose one or the other, because this idea that women are independent and capable of full agency, but also men are responsible for all bad female behavior can't survivie
Young men will just listen to the Andrew Tates of the world because you have nothing to offer them
I don’t understand. For decades, feminists have argued that women have full control over their minds and that even pointing out mood changes during a cycle is just male misogyny.
Now, that entire argument is getting thrown out the window because the Lindsay Clancy defense is literally claiming in open court that hormones can turn someone into a deranged psychopath capable of child murder. It’s wild to watch that narrative completely flip.
A not-guilty finding based on hormones and insanity would have crazy implications. For example, if hormonal states can legally erase accountability, why wouldn’t they also affect fitness for jobs, high-pressure decisions, firearms, and parenting?
Courts cannot treat a woman as legally insane for the worst possible act and then pretend the same reasoning has no implications anywhere else.
Also, Lindsay Clancy is no more insane than Jeffrey Dahmer, who was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, and a psychotic disorder, and yet, he was still declared legally sane at trial. For the sake of those children, and for the sake of all the good that’s in this world, I hope the jury makes the only sensible decision here
Some of you are figuring out for the first time that women are crazy. The next step is recognizing that this isn't a bad thing. Women are supposed to be playing with children, living in a fantasy dream world in the center of a family, constantly making up stories, trying to make everyone around them happy, creating the circumstances for whimsy and joy, adding beauty to the world with careful attention to details that nobody else thinks matter, possessing the ability to be delicate and soft and funny even when things are really hard. Women are supposed to be crazy.
For some reason, when a "crazy" person does something, the voices in her head never say something like "buy something nice for a random person to make their day better."
Or even "attack someone bigger and stronger than you."
It's always "kill someone weaker than you."
Funny.
Millennial weddings are a complete farce. The notion that two people in their thirties met on a dating app and found "true love" rather than a temporary arrangement of convenience, complacency, and conformity would be funny if it weren't so sad.
@JoshuaLisec Getting married turned into handing your woman a red button. You hope & pray she never presses it but it’s always there for her. 10, 20, 30, 40 years down the road even. Could happen at any time, for any reason
Nick Fuentes breaks down why race realism matters
"It's not a coincidence that black people here and black people in the Caribbean and black people in Africa… are all unsuccessful because their average IQ is 75."
@Babygravy9 The cameraman keeping his phone pointed at the spot the guy fell in at for a full twenty seconds is an interesting insight into the Indian mind.
It's noteworthy that once you adjust for demographics, Mississippi is the state with the second highest test scores in the country.
It's right behind Massachusetts!