@sickoffsinn@ninafromcanada@nis_cherri@SeS041187575212@rqvioliformuoli If you keep specifying that only humans with two legs are human, then yeah you’d be saying amputees aren’t human.
If your definition excludes and hurts people, who you’d say are part of your group, I’d say it be worth it to change it.
@sickoffsinn@ninafromcanada@nis_cherri@SeS041187575212@rqvioliformuoli Are you getting tired from moving goal posts yet? You asked for a Mariam Webster definition, and I gave you one. But now you want to argue with the *dictionary* 😒
Also, by your definition, women who can’t reproduce/lack parts aren’t women? See how your logic hurts you too yet?
@sickoffsinn@ninafromcanada@nis_cherri@SeS041187575212@rqvioliformuoli If we abolished gender, we wouldn’t be having this argument. We wouldn’t have the labels to argue about, we wouldn’t have the definitions of the labels, we certainly wouldn’t take the time to check so someone’s chromosomes before dating them. We’d just go off of looks