Collected within | Our memories of a lost | And insipid youth.
Misty rainforest | To watery grave below | Find serenity.
Whispers upon wind | Better days beckons us all | Serene existence awaits.
@justicecometh1 I thought you'd been operating under that assumption the entire time. My interpretation has always been that they are a guide to get you to change your thinking and interact with events in a different manner.
Some are a bit more poignant with current events but mostly a guide.
@Agent310_097 Don't worry we saw it on the internet so it must be true.
On a more serious note, this stuff is like a poison pill that has slowly dispersed through the MAGA base. There are real things happening right in front of everyone and they're betting everything on fantasy.
Is this what they had planned for us? 😳
🚨 Newly Declassified: America Built and Funded Over 40 Labs in Ukraine That Stored Dangerous Soviet-Era Pathogens in Complete Secret
It states that the U.S. built and supported more than 40 laboratories across Ukraine and They held especially dangerous pathogens such as anthrax, Ebola, Marburg, plague, Lassa, MERS, SARS, tularemia, tuberculosis, and others.
U.S. scientists trained Ukrainian staff to work with these high-risk pathogens.
— WOW! 🤯
Many labs operated at high biosafety levels (BSL-3 and BSL-4), which are used for the most dangerous diseases.
A map in the document shows lab locations across Ukraine (including Kharkiv, Odessa, and others).
The report gives specific examples of U.S.-funded labs with exact costs — some costing over $3 million each — and names the main U.S. contractor (Black & Veatch) along with Ukrainian partners.
Several labs received official permits to work with “Especially Dangerous Pathogens.”
This document confirms the U.S. directly built and paid for dozens of labs in Ukraine, storing some of the world’s most dangerous pathogens with millions of taxpayer dollars IN COMPLETE SECRECY.
Heads need to roll!
@MikeYoungEsq@BayernAusBoston@LoneStarLegendX Would it be incumbent upon a jury to find the sudden passion for the judge to then sentence at the reduced felony? Or is it wholly up to the judge following review of evidence?