Be Be

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@Alexanderthemi4 @2EdgedClaymore @prolifefrenchie It has everything to do with the Bible.
Genesis 18:16-33
2 Peter 3:9
Ezekiel 33:11
Matthew 19:8
Hebrews 1:1-2

I can go on and on, you don’t seem to actually know the Bible, only cherry picked verses out of context.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@Alexanderthemi4 @2EdgedClaymore @prolifefrenchie Yes, He bans a lot of things and it didn’t work. He banned idolatry and within 30 days the Jews made a golden calf to worship. It’s not gymnastics that you can’t see humanity continues in its sin despite these laws, which is why Christ had to come and give us the Holy Spirit.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@Alexanderthemi4 @2EdgedClaymore @prolifefrenchie He does meet us where we are. Abraham pleads for Sodom and Gomorrah and God says he will spare them if there is a single righteous person. God isn’t quick to judgment, He wants all to have the chance to repent, which is why he gave S&G 300 years the same goes for the flood.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@Alexanderthemi4 @2EdgedClaymore @prolifefrenchie It’s called progressive revelation. Jesus states Moses allowed divorce because our hearts were hard but in the beginning it was not so. God meets humanity where they are and lays the foundation for humans to change. Banning does not work with humans, and we see that in history.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@ixg313 @akven0m @ryandavid42 @YaseenSeekTruth @mattvanswol I guess that’s all your reasoning boils down to.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@ixg313 @akven0m @ryandavid42 @YaseenSeekTruth @mattvanswol Why did you leave out the “In the name of Christ” part he said with that? Hebrews 11 lists many people in the Old Testament who were saved despite not meeting Christ. So yes it’s disingenuous of you to cite OT in reply when Christ had yet to walk the earth in those chapters.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@ixg313 @akven0m @ryandavid42 @YaseenSeekTruth @mattvanswol Disingenuous to cite Old Testament passages established under the old covenant without including context from the new one under Christ. He said kill in the name of Christ. Christians doing acts contrary to the text does not prove your point. The Quran has direct calls to violence

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@ixg313 @ryandavid42 @YaseenSeekTruth @mattvanswol The same applies for war. It’s not only about reading the Bible but to understand the concepts in context. Passages like Matthew 5 and Romans 13 paint a clear picture that God does not like war. God’s judgment is also separate from the human institution of war.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@ixg313 @ryandavid42 @YaseenSeekTruth @mattvanswol Isaiah 2:4 and Hebrews 1:1-2 show Old Testament war was concession God made to meet humans where they were to slowly constrain war over time, this is progressive revelation. Jesus said that Moses allowed divorce because our hearts were hard but in the beginning it was not so.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@XeraCalm77 @LowlyQi @CapVinicio @ianmiles Those dates clearly say 2025, we’re well into 2026 and as many others have stated there are tagged pictures proving it is her. Why die on this hill?

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@ShortSeller LITE achieved 16 channels on their laser array using TWO ESLFP modules combined together in 2026. SIVE did it using ONE integrated InP chip in 2024! LITE is far behind and again, that’s why they had to poach from Ayar. They don’t need new InP fab but module assembly scale.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@ShortSeller Your calculations are correct if you’re operating under the current laser die business model but the next generation CPO will be fully integrated as a laser array in an assembled ELS module, multiplying revenue despite the bottleneck you cite. Ayar + Jabil.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@ShortSeller You are leaving out Jabil’s manufacturing infrastructure?Siver’s CPO architecture is ahead of LITE’s hence they poach Ayar’s VP of laser engineering. 1 of 10 is incorrect as it’s not a typical $2-20 ASP die it’s a 8-16 channel DFB array sold in a complete ELS Module.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@jasonschips Q2FY26 earnings LITE said they’re only at the starting line for CPO not ready until 2027. Poach knowledge, funding by NVDIA while SIVE already has been working on demos for years, you say it can’t qualify but Jabil partnership implies it’s near ready.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@jasonschips Bottleneck is used not to say that SIVE has a monopoly but ground in a constrained environment. Why would Ayer labs whose architecture depends on laser performance pick SIVE over LITE if they were so inferior? LITE poached a VP from Ayer after they picked SIVE for laser arrays.

[Be Be @BeBe67361006]

@BreadWinneh ?