@Polythene_bag@dr_caffeine_ Actually, it differs from institute to institute, in addition to the interest of the person. One needs to put in a lot of efforts on one’s own end. Acads across India 8: not a teacher driven thing tbh. It is the willpower, willingness and perseverance of the student. 😔
Thank You India! We have a brotherly country that sends aid to flod affected people and then we have muslim neighbour who deport Afghan refugees at this critical time. Children shivering under the plastic tents in Torkham. Friendship, respect is earned it is not given by free.
India will always stay the strongest friend to Afghans.🇦🇫❤️🇮🇳
@stjamestheright@sanchezcastejon Also, while we’re at it, let me remark that I’m not condoning any atrocities. I’m not here to win arguments, because frankly, only emotionally unintelligent people are pleased to win. I’m here to put my point across. I don’t give a toss to how much uninformed someone wants to be.
@stjamestheright@sanchezcastejon As for your irrelevant personal remarks regarding my IQ, I never claimed to be smart or anything for that matter, I just engaged in a discussion. Besides, you have insufficient data to comment upon my IQ. Whatever you presumed was due to your prejudices, not science. (2/2)
@stjamestheright@sanchezcastejon I very well know the Allied and Axis powers. Both of them were power hungry lots who both had dirty laundry they’d rather not air publicly. The simplest thing I would like to let you know is that Allied Military forces won at the cost of impoverished colonies. (1/2)
@stjamestheright@sanchezcastejon What immediate problem was solved? Please let me know.
Besides, apart from solving an immediate problem at hand, the ramifications and ripples of any action also needs to be accounted for. That is why infants don’t lead nations (=due to “out of sight, out of mind” mentality).
@stjamestheright@sanchezcastejon Did WW2 solve world’s problems?
No, it created hostility amongst nations. It was devastating for humanity. Hiroshima and Nagasaki people till date have health issues.
Suggest something else then, oh wise man.
@stjamestheright@sanchezcastejon No to violations of international law:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights,Geneva Conventions,Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women,Rights of the Child,Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.
When the world says NO to war, India should be leading that moral call — not echoing Washington in silence.
Strategic autonomy was never meant to be selective courage. If international law is violated, India must say so — clearly and independently.
Bowing to power is not diplomacy.
Standing for peace with dignity is.
The “few irresponsible leaders” Pedro Sánchez references are the so-called “Azores Three”: U.S. President George W. Bush, U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair, and Spain’s Prime Minister at the time, José María Aznar. They met in the Azores in March 2003 and launched the invasion of Iraq without UN Security Council approval.
The world, Europe, and Spain have faced this critical moment before. In 2003, a few irresponsible leaders dragged us into an illegal war in the Middle East that brought nothing but insecurity and pain.
Our response then must be our response now:
NO to violations of international law.
NO to the illusion that we can solve the world’s problems with bombs.
NO to repeating the mistakes of the past.
NO TO WAR.
https://t.co/KpRjBfwY4B
@farhatsanzar @ZohraRa How they are much more dignified than NaPakis? Yeppp. Everyone in the neighbourhood is familiar and the world is getting to know. ✨