William Tauriainen

Here I am, here you are.

[William Tauriainen @BeSeeEyeEye]

@mwonnow @SamiAntinniemi Eiköhän kumpikin osaa omalla tavallaan sitä tuhoa edistää

[Vacha @TVachaW]

All addiction is addiction to unconsciousness

[Owen Benjamin 🐻 @OwenBenjamin]

The more you pick the more it grows. It’s completely counter intuitive to the modern scarcity model. But if you don’t pick beans they stop growing. The more fruit you pick the healthier the tree. The seeds fall from everything and just more grows and grows.

The idea of man being a plague on the earth is completely inverted. We actually make everything more fertile the more we cultivate and grow. It’s one reason why rural agrarians can appear low ambition or “simple.” It’s because there really isn’t anything to worry about. The more you take the more you receive. It’s mind blowing.

[Andrew Torba @BasedTorba]

The Industrial Revolution put engineers and bureaucrats in charge. The craftsmen and theologians who once shaped society were pushed aside. Faith and meaning gave way to making everything faster, cheaper, and more efficient.

Ironically the machines they built are coming for their own jobs and authority. AI is writing the code, running the systems, and handling the paperwork that made these people powerful.

It does their job better, faster, and cheaper than they ever could. This is the real reason all of these people are in a state of panic and want you to fear AI. It's not Doomsday for us, it's Doomsday for THEM.

This opens the door for theologians and thinkers to lead again. Suddenly spirituality matters. When machines can build almost anything you ask for the real power belongs to whoever decides what to ask for.

What should we build? What is good? What is life for? These are the questions that will shape the next civilization and those with spiritual discernment will be the ones leading through this new age.

[𝙹𝚎𝚗𝚗𝚢 🦋 @jennifer_stoney]

Odotan sitä kaunista päivää kun aloitetaan ihan julkisesti puhumaan muslimien rasisismista suomalaisia kohtaan. Ne eivät todellakaan arvosta ruokkivaa kättä. Päinvastoin sylkevät meidän päälle ja kertovat kuinka meidän tulisi elää kotimaassamme. Ja pellet jauhaa äärioikeistosta.

[Andrew Torba @BasedTorba]

A lot of people are in for a rude awakening over the next few years.

Many people mistakenly still believe that AI is still just a novelty chat toy or a new type of Google search. Those of us on the frontlines are seeing what is possible and where things are going. You need to adapt. I beg you: please do not allow your ego to get in the way. Do not make your vocation your central identity. Things are going to change radically and quickly.

God gave you talents. You have a responsibility to cultivate them. AI doesn't replace your calling, your discernment, or your willingness to work. When used well AI can help you apply your gifts at a scale that was previously out of reach, but only if you don't let your ego get in the way and remain stuck in the past.

A small business can accomplish more without a massive budget. A parent can spend less time on busywork and more time with the children. Someone with an idea can build what they once could only imagine.

You don’t need to worship the technology, but you also don’t need to fear it either. You need to understand it and put it to work in service of things that matter.

Be humble enough to learn.

Be disciplined enough to practice.

The promise and vision that we have for AI is to get more of your life back and do something worthy with it.

Lean into that.

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

The worst and most prolonged psychological torture you can inflict on a woman is to convince her she's as good as any man.

This torture is lifelong, unendurable, and once you set up the initial conditions, the pain becomes self-inflicted.

You see, women are genetically programmed for two things. First, to raise children. Second, to select a man who is superior to her to bear those children for.

Not equal.

Certainly not lesser.

Superior.

There is no point in arguing about this. It is obviously true to anyone who looks around himself without blinders made of wishful thinking.

There is no point in becoming angry at me or anyone else about this. It is true whether I wish it to be or not, and whether you wish it to be or not.

There is no point in trying to talk women out of this. It is not a part of their culture or education. It is not an individual character flaw in them. It is part of their genetic recipe.

Therefore, if you convince a woman she is equal to most men, she will only be willing to bear children to a small percentage of exceptional men.

If you convince her that she is the equal of any man, she will be unwilling to start a family with anyone.

And she will remain genetically programmed to do so.

When I was a child, and again when I was a young man, in high school and college, I noticed that the older adults who staffed the education system seemed to think "girls' self-esteem" was our most precious resource, perhaps because it's good for stable nuclear fusion containment, or as a growth medium for cancer-curing fruit trees.

Well, I sure hope they're making good progress on that nuclear fusion thing, because it sure is hard on the women they grow up into.

Perhaps they thought having a high self-esteem is the same as feeling good.

Perhaps they thought half of humanity's potential Newtons, Einsteins, and Da Vincis were hidden among the ranks of the fair sex, waiting to be unlocked by "Project Self Esteem", and no, I did not make that name up.

Perhaps they were retarded.

They did, after all, work for the government.

Self-esteem is not being happy. Self-esteem is not even feeling good. Self-esteem is how awesome you think you are.

And if you think you're awesome, when you're mediocre, then you're miserable, because everyone around you treats you a whole lot worse than you think you deserve.

High self-esteem is great for young men. It makes them take risks. And to thrive men need to take risks, and achieve things, for many reasons, one of which is that women only mate up.

High self-esteem is not so good for young women. It doesn't get them anything they wouldn't have already had. It just makes them less happy with it.

Sure, there's such a thing as self-esteem too low, but if a woman can look you in the eye, instead of in the shoes, when she talks to you, she's pretty much good to go.

Anything more than that is superfluous at best, and at worst... well, eyeball the video for a moment and you'll see what I mean.

But the misery isn't just personal.

This is the fertility crisis in a nutshell. We, Western civilization, have spent the past five or six decades telling little boys that they are worthless sacks of protoplasm, and telling little girls that the sun shines out of their collective girl parts.

And look what's happened.

The fertility crisis is stupidly simple. When you elevate the status of women by giving them a greater share of respect, and of society's wealth, which is created by men, they refuse to have children.

You can reverse this by allowing men to keep the wealth they create, instead of giving it to women.

Then they will give it to women themselves, but the women will look up to them, and there will be children again.

During the Trump administration so far, 94% of new job went to women. This is not natural or organic. This doesn't happen on its own. This is not happening because women are "crushing it".

Women are the same women they have always been, risk averse, clustered around average intelligence, prone to wait for others to lead.

This is not an accident. This is spin on the ball. Women vote. And pandering is an easy way to get those votes.

But give a moderately pretty one a single email job at a Silicon Valley startup, and pretty soon she thinks that the father of her children should be a "post-economic" jet-setter with the body of a professional athlete who ticks all the boxes her therapist thinks are important.

And she thinks she can pick him off a shelf at age 35.

This is a vote, conscious or not, willing or not, for the extinction of humanity.

Throughout the genetic history of humanity, approximately 80% of women had children, as opposed to 37% of men. Those numbers don't lie. Most men either weren't exceptional enough to breed, or died trying to become exceptional enough to breed.

Women just had to not be in the bottom quintile. Not to be horrible, or horribly unlucky.

This bears out what we already know.

And this is why Western civilization told women they were the weaker sex, the dumber sex, the more fragile sex. Why Eve was said to made to serve Adam.

Because this preserved civilization and the species.

Women were actually happier that way, because women don't want to win. They want a winner.

But even if it didn't, what choice would we have?

The only nations and tribes in the world which are still breeding are the ones where women are still of low status. And if you try to replace Westerners with them, try to make them into Westerners, not only will you fail, but even if you succeed, they'll stop breeding, too.

And we know now why there are no matriarchies. Its not because men have superior strength, and enslaved women with violence. It's because matriarchies don't breed.

Humans are an animal, like any other animal. Every animal has mating rituals, and if those rituals can't be conducted, there will be no next generation. This is why some animals can be bred in zoos, and others cannot.

We know what's wrong.

We just lack the political will to fix it.

Because it's "not fair".

Well, of course it's not fair. But look around you. Look at the universe. Look at history.

Whatever made you expect that things would be fair?

[Juha Korhonen 🇫🇮 @Juha_Korh2]

Mutta oli juuri varaa laittaa 300 miljoonaa euroa, Ukrainan korruptioon.

[PsychoMath (hoe_math) @itispsychomath]

A "nazi" is any white person who believes what all white people believed while we were building the world that everyone else now takes for granted.

[Tuomas Malinen @mtmalinen]

I would argue that you're seeing the most visible (violent) decline in Finland.

In the late 1990s, we were the model country. We were high on the tech, had a supreme education system, and had excellent infrastructure, with an egalitarian, rapidly growing economy. We had it "too good," and the Finnish success story needed to be ended.

So, in 1999, PM Paavo Lipponen and @niinisto took us to the euro. The aim of this was to slowly strangle our economy, which proved to be very successful after the GFC (2008).

Then PM @jyrkikatainen sold us to Europe by agreeing to the (illegal) Greek bailout against the will of the Finnish populace and then sold our electricity distribution to foreign investors (through Caruna Corporation).

PM Juha Sipilä opened our borders to the invasive force in 2015 and destroyed our taxi business with the help of @elinavaltonen .

The abysmal government of the abysmal PM @MarinSanna destroyed our economy and constitution with the Corona lockdowns and took us into NATO without a referendum.

The government of @PetteriOrpo welcomed US troops on our soil while closing our eastern border, effectively killing our economy. Now the same government is celebrating a mediocre economic growth driven almost solely by a data center takeover of our nation (which we have no electricity to run).

All this time, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry has done its utmost to undermine our food production, while @Opetushallitus has unleashed a campaign to eradicate our education. Both of them, most likely led by high-ranking Freemason civil servants in those organizations, have been highly successful in their deeds.

We have fallen the farthest, I argue, and keep falling further because we have been selected to lead the next front against Russia.

Our politicians should be punished severely for their traitorousness.
@SariEssayah @ir_rkp @AnttiLindtman @hirvelanjuho @Sakerui2025 @SakariPuisto @mmm_fi

[Vacha @TVachaW]

A simple instruction for “Do Nothing” Meditation would be:

“Maintain open awareness and simply allow whatever wants to arise to arise, without interfering.”

A paradox many encounter with this instruction is something like:

“How can I maintain open awareness without interfering?”

ie something like “What if awareness starts to contract or dissociate? Don’t I then need to *do* something or interfere to remain in open awareness?”

The simple answer to that question is in fact: “No”.

My experience is that contractions actually don’t carry much of their own momentum if they aren’t actively given energy.

So when awareness starts to contract or dissociate (eg getting lost in thought or blended in a sticky way with an emotion), we don’t have to *do* anything to reverse this process.

Actually, it is *doing* something with the mind here that will provide the energy that increases the momentum of the contraction.

All we have to do is simply not give any energy to the contraction.

That is, Do Nothing.

The contraction may remain for a period of time but the more we practice Do Nothing approaches and cease offering the contraction energy to feed its momentum, the shorter and less frequent these periods will become.

We will also experience the joy of seeing contractions *self-liberate* spontaneously simply as a result of our awareness giving the contraction the light and space it needs to do so.

The more we see that contractions have the capacity to self liberate when left in the light and spaciousness of awareness, the easier it is to not energetically intervene when they arise.

The easier it is to not energetically intervene when contractions arise, the easier it is for them to self-liberate.

And so, a beautiful virtuous circle is created.

[Vacha @TVachaW]

If you are brave and want to accelerate your spiritual path, a good method is to practice what I call Suffering Weightlifting.

In physical weightlifting we gradually build our ability to lift more physical weight.

In Suffering Weightlifting, we gradually build our capacity to hold suffering.

We can do this by simply sitting still and quietly inviting any suffering that wants to be felt to come into awareness.

There usually won’t be a shortage - our bodies and minds tend to have plenty of latent suffering that is desperate to be felt.

Usually the suffering that needs to be felt most will naturally shout loudest if we invite it in.

Once in awareness, we simply see how long and how deeply we can keep that suffering in awareness without pushing it away or clenching into it.

I find it has similar mechanics to physical weightlifting - the more we habituate ourselves to holding suffering in awareness, the greater our capacity for it grows.

Before long, suffering that would have felt very difficult to hold starts to feel very light.

At this stage we can then gently and gradually invite in ever more intense forms of unconscious emotional suffering into awareness.

What you may find is that our capacity to experience suffering equates quite strongly to our capacity to experience reality.

This is because, for the most part, the parts of reality we are blocking out are the parts that cause us suffering.

This makes a capacity for emotional suffering quite pivotal to developing insight into reality.

If we can’t experience the parts of reality that cause us to suffer, then we can’t really experience much of reality at all.

And if we can’t experience much reality at all, then our hopes of gaining insight into its nature are pretty slim.

[Vacha @TVachaW]

Awareness is the currency of our internal mental economy.

If you encounter someone on the streets who is impoverished and suffering, you might offer them some of your money.

In the same way, when you encounter a part of your psyche that is suffering and malnourished, the best thing you can do for them is offer them some of your awareness.

It’s usually what they want more than to be problem-solved or wrapped up in a bunch of thoughts.

They just want you to spend some of your awareness on them.

Awareness serves like space and light in our inner world.

When our suffering parts can see where they are going and have space to expand in their natural direction, their own internal wisdom will guide them back into health and happiness.

It can actually be quite a relief for the ego to discover this too.

The ego doesn’t need to be a saviour or a problem solver.

It just needs to step out of the way to let the light and space of awareness flow where it needs to go.

Nourished by the light and space of awareness, our suffering parts have an inherent capacity for spontaneous self-healing.

[William Tauriainen @BeSeeEyeEye]

@OrangeVibes @KaviKovi @cosmorxn *learing

[suboptimo @__suboptimo]

Guys, I hope you have all accepted the fact that faggots, bitches, jews, and kikeslaves are going to cry.

And that’s perfectly okay. Carry on.

[Ron Sovereignty Swanson⚡️🗝️ @RonSwanonson]

Forcing somebody to work for, and price things in, a money that somebody else can print for free will be looked back on as barbaric and predatory 100 years from now

The fact that somebody else can devalue your time and effort without your consent is the biggest violation of human rights that’s still happening today in modern society

[ℜ𝔞𝔢 @dystopiangf]

Once you’ve woken up, there are extremely diminishing returns to continuing to consume blackpilling stats, even though they’re true. You need to pivot your information environment towards empowerment & action. Stop passively consuming the truth and start creating it

[Max @minordissent]

one of the biggest challenges about human cooperation is that most people are either truth oriented or persuasion oriented, almost never both.

You only discover the truth precisely because you dont give a shit what other people think about the truth. And you only become really persuasive precisely because you dont give a shit about whats true only whats influential.

Problem is it leads to everyone who is correct to be socially ostracized and ignored, and everyone who is socially powerful to be retarded or evil.

Making persuasive people truth seeking seems unlikely to gain traction. Thus, making truth seekers persuasive seems the only viable way out.

[William Tauriainen @BeSeeEyeEye]

@ArsVampyre @ChristianHeiens *wielding, but yes, precisely!