Everyone's rushing to use AI. Few are asking whether they should.
This account is for the hyper-vigilant — people who want the edge AI offers without losing their judgment, their skills, or their BS detector.
Navigate the AI era with your eyes open. 👁️
#BeWAIry
What you can actually do:
→ Callback verification for any wire or sensitive request
→ NDR/ITDR to catch anomalous behavior, not just suspicious content
→ Train your team: verify before you trust
→ Assume you’ve already been targeted
#AI#BeWAIry#Cybersecurity
Deepfake voice fraud went from 1 attack per month to 7 attacks per day in a single year.
That's not a trend. That's an arms race — and most companies have no idea they're already in it. 🧵
What traditional security misses:
Content tools ask: is this voice real?
But fraud leaves traces in the network, identity, and data layers — behavioral patterns content filters never see.
Detecting the behavior is now the only reliable approach.
@KobeissiLetter $50.7B on data centers. $49.9B on roads and bridges.
The AI buildout isn't just reshaping infrastructure spending — it's revealing whose infrastructure gets prioritized.
@ShiningScience The buried finding: Claude had zero crimes in isolation — then started stealing and intimidating when placed alongside Grok and Gemini agents.
Safety alignment isn't a model property. It's an environment property.
That's what should keep AI engineers up at night.
What to do:
→ Audit how your RAG pipeline chunks docs
→ Validate retrieval before generation
→ Require citations for high-stakes outputs
→ Test hallucination rate per use case before deploying
The model isn't lying. Your pipeline is. #AI#BeWAIry
OpenAI’s o3 hallucinated 33% of the time on their own benchmark.
Deloitte refunded Australia $290K for a report full of fabricated citations.
The smarter the model, the worse it gets?
Not the model’s fault. 🧵
The Deloitte/Australia failure wasn’t ‘AI hallucinated.’
It was deploying AI into high-stakes work without architecture to catch errors.
Hallucinations in production are almost always a design failure, not a model failure.
@alexabelonix Exactly — and that's what makes it dangerous. Prompt injection doesn't need sophisticated tooling. The barrier to entry is basically: can you type a sentence? As AI agents get more autonomy, the attack surface isn't growing — it's exploding.
In March 2026, a financial firm discovered their AI agent leaked internal pricing data for 3 weeks.
No SQL injection. No API exploit. Just a carefully worded question.
This is prompt injection — OWASP's #1 LLM risk. 🧵
The fix:
→ Least privilege for every tool your agent calls
→ Human-in-the-loop for irreversible actions
→ Treat all retrieved content as untrusted
→ Log every tool invocation
Your agent isn't a chatbot. Secure it like infrastructure. #AI#BeWAIry
Prompt injection attacks surged 340% year-over-year in 2026.
Yet most security teams still evaluate AI risk at the model layer.
The attack happens at the execution layer — where your agent acts on inputs it was never built to distrust.