Paraphrasing @mksgallego: Linguistic justice is inseparable from social justice. Looking forward to more conversations in this Twitter Space: #istoryahanay
@nashtysmans I avoid using Global South/Global North too. I choose to use “Third World” even if it’s problematic too. “Third World” was adopted at the Bandung Conference - I think that’s a genealogy I can invoke/align with.
Now that aspiring anti-racist academics are learning they should cite BIPOC scholars, especially women, please note it’s not just WHO you cite but HOW you cite—are BIPOC authors regarded as theorists or just case studies demonstrating the validity of white theorists’ concepts?
Seems that lots of the “decolonizing” that folks say they’re doing in academia is likely, upon critical reflection, mostly superficial, and probably a lot more like re-colonizing. Am I alone in thinking this? Becoming skeptical + ready to drop this key word from my approach...