It’s finished. 🎬 Submitted for Cinequest Film Festival.
Under This Feeling
An original song. A musical film. One night at The Lucky Devil.
Written, produced, directed & edited by Robert P. Perez.
A song. A place. A moment before everything changes.
Hope you enjoy it.
@WallStreetApes The security camera. These are almost always fitted with fixed wide-angle lenses (commonly ~2.8 mm or similar) that deliver a broad field of view—typically in the 90–110°+ range—to cover hallways or open areas.
I love TV shows like NCIS.
They show brilliant scientists solving crimes with the latest technology.
But in real life, police and prosecutors often use junk science to jail innocent people:
Dr. Mark Hyman outlines how the ketogenic diet can reverse cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia and more—by converting the body's fuel source from carbohydrates to fat.
"Across the spectrum—whether it's autism, or Alzheimer's, or cancer, or type two diabetes—for certain people, ketogenic diets can be life-changing."
Politicians say they can "improve" the economy.
They impose minimum wages, wealth taxes, more spending on the needy.
But their social engineering makes things worse.
Here Economist Don Boudreaux explains why "we prosper more, the more economically free we are.”
Alma was a healthcare worker for over 25 years. She had insurance. And when her oncologist recommended MD Anderson for a second opinion, they told her it would be $16,000 upfront just to be seen.
She couldn't afford it. She didn't get the care.
Alma passed away.
I stood up to honor her today because she deserves to be remembered. And because her words are still doing something — still making people uncomfortable in the right way.
"If they treat me like that, can you imagine how they treat someone that doesn't know anything?"
No. We shouldn't have to imagine it. We should be outraged by it.
Alma's name means soul. And I felt her soul in that room today.
Rest in power, Alma. We're still listening. 🤍
🚨THE ONE REAL CONCERN NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT
AI data centers are being forced into communities under the banner of “progress.”
But one issue alone is enough for the people to protest:
TONAL NOISE.
That constant industrial hum. The low frequency vibration. The mechanical drone from fans, cooling systems, transformers, and generators running day and night.
This is not “background noise.”
This invades homes. It disrupts sleep. It agitates the nervous system. It destroys peace, property value, farm animal reproductive systems, and quality of life.
There is a reason militaries have used sound and tonal noise as psychological torture.
Now imagine that same kind of relentless noise embedded permanently in your community, serving Big Tech, AI, surveillance, and data harvesting.
No tax incentive is worth that.
No corporate promise is worth that.
No county commission has the moral right to trade away the peace and health of the people for an AI data center deal.
Tonal noise alone is enough.
The people have every right to protest before the hum becomes permanent.
Byron Donalds and Jay Collins are PRO AI DATA CENTERS.
The ONLY Candidate standing up and saying HELL NO to these massive community impact projects is @Paul_Renner.
Renner is a HARD PASS on AI Data Centers.
Listen...here's why
WOW:
“15 years ago, HHS determined that 2.6% of vaccine recipients are seriously injured.”
“This is not rare.”
“That’s a huge number.”
“And only about 1% or fewer of these injuries are ever reported.”
Leslie Manookian just revealed bombshell research from the government itself that exposed the truth about vaccine injuries.
“In 2012, 54% of American school kids had a chronic illness.”
“It could be asthma, allergies, food allergies, speech delay, learning disability, autism, obesity, all these kinds of things.”
“And there is science connecting all of these things to vaccinations.”
“Kids have only gotten sicker.”
“It was 54% 14 years ago.”
“Now it’s like 75% of all American kids have some kind of chronic illness.”
“Of course, it’s not only the shots.”
“It’s also the pesticides, and who knows what else.”
“There’s so many other factors.”
“That’s the purpose of the Medical Freedom Act, to put the power back in the hands of the individual.”
Our Medical Freedom Act Coalition is pushing legislation in states across the country to outlaw medical mandates.
Shots, pills, drugs, masks, tests—everything.
Idaho passed a Medical Freedom Act last year.
This year, we’re working to take that victory nationwide.
@LeslieManookian@ChefJamesBarry
American was driving a brand new 2026 car
The car gave her an alert that said it couldn’t see her eyes. The car then automatically disabled the gas and slowed down enough that it could have caused an accident
She had to lean toward so the car’s facial recognition could register her eyes and stop the “kill switch” because the car thought she might be asleep
“It was a 6 lane highway and all of a sudden the gas stopped working and I'm pressing on the gas. I can't get the car to go. So the car is dinging, it's making all this noise and I can't figure out what's going on. And I look at the dashboard and in English it says, sit up straight. We can't find your eyes.
Why? Why do you need to see my eyes? — when I sat upright, the gas would work once again. And so I pressed the gas, but I was slowing down enough that it was gonna cause a traffic hazard.
And the thing is, it knew I wasn't asleep because I was pressing on the gas. So it knew I was awake. It just wanted to see my eyes. So once I set upright and leaned forward, I guess it did facial recognition. And then it says, may I send you these results to a third party”
This is horrifying considering the new mandate to have kill switches in every new vehicle by 2027. It looks like it’s already happening but overseas, we’re just next
This technology can and will be abused by the government
46 wetenschappers van het IPCC hebben hun ontslag genomen.
De reden?
Omdat er niet naar hen geluisterd wordt, omdat hun meningen afwijken van het gangbare verhaal!
Maar geloof me niet zomaar op mijn woord, hier zijn hun verklaringen:
Dr. Robert Balling: Het IPCC merkt op dat "er geen significante versnelling van de zeespiegelstijging in de 20e eeuw is waargenomen." Dit stond niet in de IPCC-samenvatting voor beleidsmakers.
Dr. Lucka Bogataj: "Stijgende concentraties koolstofdioxide in de atmosfeer veroorzaken geen wereldwijde temperatuurstijging... eerst veranderde de temperatuur en zo'n 700 jaar later volgde een verandering in de hoeveelheid koolstofdioxide in de atmosfeer."
Dr. John Christy: "Wat weinig mensen weten, is dat de meeste wetenschappers die bij het IPCC betrokken zijn, het er niet over eens zijn dat er sprake is van klimaatverandering. De bevindingen van het IPCC zijn in elk opeenvolgend rapport steevast verkeerd voorgesteld en/of gepolitiseerd."
Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: "De mens heeft slechts een paar tienden van een graad bijgedragen aan de opwarming van de aarde. Zonneactiviteit is een belangrijke drijvende kracht achter het klimaat."
Dr. Richard Courtney: "Het empirische bewijs wijst er sterk op dat de hypothese van door de mens veroorzaakte opwarming van de aarde onjuist is."
Dr. Judith Curry: "Ik ga niet zomaar mijn mening geven en het IPCC steunen, want ik heb geen vertrouwen in het proces."
Dr. Robert Davis: "De wereldwijde temperaturen veranderen niet zoals de meest geavanceerde klimaatmodellen voorspelden. In de samenvatting van het IPCC voor beleidsmakers wordt geen enkele keer melding gemaakt van temperatuurmetingen via satellieten."
Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 noemde het IPCC mij als een van de circa 3000 ‘wetenschappers’ die het erover eens waren dat er een aantoonbare menselijke invloed op het klimaat bestaat. Dat was ik niet. Er is geen bewijs dat de hypothese ondersteunt dat een ongecontroleerde, catastrofale klimaatverandering het gevolg is van menselijke activiteiten.”
Dr. Chris de Freitas: "Besluitvormers binnen de overheid zouden inmiddels moeten weten dat de basis voor de aloude bewering dat koolstofdioxide een belangrijke drijvende kracht achter het wereldwijde klimaat is, ter discussie staat; en daarmee ook de tot nu toe aangenomen noodzaak van kostbare maatregelen om de uitstoot van koolstofdioxide te beperken. Als ze het niet weten, komt dat door het lawaai van de klimaathysterie, die gebaseerd is op de drogreden van 'argumenten uit onwetendheid' en voorspellingen van computermodellen."
Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: "Er is nog veel meer vooruitgang nodig met betrekking tot ons huidige begrip van het klimaat en onze mogelijkheden om het te modelleren."
Dr. Peter Dietze: "Door gebruik te maken van een gebrekkig werveldiffusiemodel heeft het IPCC de toekomstige opname van koolstofdioxide door de oceanen ernstig onderschat."
Dr. John Everett: "Het is tijd voor een realiteitscheck. De oceanen en kustgebieden zijn veel warmer en kouder geweest dan wordt voorspeld in de huidige klimaatveranderingsscenario's. Ik heb het IPCC en recentere wetenschappelijke literatuur bestudeerd en ben van mening dat er geen probleem is met toenemende verzuring, zelfs niet tot de onwaarschijnlijke niveaus in de meest gebruikte IPCC-scenario's."
Oh, and as a sidebar, @PeterAttiaMD sidestepping conversations and avoiding data seems to be a theme.
I have to say, in the broader context, "thank you." It's really a useful springboard to reinforce key teaching points
https://t.co/WeUuYQ69QG