It is difficult to directly blame Barack Obama for the current state of race relations, but it is hard to deny that America is far more racially divided today than we were before his election.
The election of a black president, when whites made up 74% of voters and over 70% of the adult population, should have been the final nail in the coffin for race baiters especially in the legacy media. Instead, it only seemed to energize them.
As long as there is money to be made by fraudsters and power to be gained (Democrats) by dividing the country along racial lines and villainizing whites, racism will continue to thrive.
It is difficult to directly blame Barack Obama for the current state of race relations, but it is hard to deny that America is far more racially divided today than we were before his election.
The election of a black president, when whites made up 74% of voters and over 70% of the adult population, should have been the final nail in the coffin for race baiters especially in the legacy media. Instead, it only seemed to energize them.
As long as there is money to be made by fraudsters and power to be gained (Democrats) by dividing the country along racial lines and villainizing whites, racism will continue to thrive.
Stephen A. Smith is a jewel. We need more like him. He took the high road despite being unfairly labeled "low IQ." To be fair, Trump who is thin skinned and has no filter was reacting to being unfairly labeled"selfish" and "narcassistic" for attending a silly basketball game.
He stood up for Trump and unequivocally said he is not a racist.
As for the idea that "If you are not pro-Trump, you are his enemy," that is precisely how it seems with Biden, Clinton, and Obama based on their own words, although the sentiment is not so blatant.
It is difficult to directly blame Barack Obama for the current state of race relations, but it is hard to deny that America is far more racially divided today than we were before his election.
The election of a black president, when whites made up 74% of voters and over 70% of the adult population, should have been the final nail in the coffin for race baiters especially in the legacy media. Instead, it only seemed to energize them.
As long as there is money to be made by fraudsters and power to be gained (Democrats) by dividing the country along racial lines and villainizing whites, racism will continue to thrive.
@RedWavePress Just to be clear I am not implying that Smith is a "jewel" because he allowed himself to be "degraded", but because he told the truth.
It is odd how Stephen Smith saying Trump is "selfish" and narcassistic, is speaking the truth while Trump's response is racist.
Stephen A. Smith is a jewel. We need more like him.
He took the high road despite being unfairly labeled "low IQ." He stood up for Trump and unequivocally said he is not a racist.
As for the idea that "If you are not pro-Trump, you are his enemy," that is precisely how it seems with Biden, Clinton, and Obama based on their own words, although the sentiment is not so blatant.
Again, Trump was responding to "selfish" and "narcissistic" and took the low road. Was Smith crossing a "racial line," or does only one side get to use "racism" as a sword and shield?
By your logic; when a white person is criticized or called a name it is true but when the person criticized is not white it is racism. What is it when a white person criticized another white person?
I'm sorry you feel so persecuted by an entire race. I can tell it's really tough on you, but I guess at least you can play the victim and avoid personal accountability.
He is a jewel and a better man because he took the "high road" despite being baited. He did not bite back.
Incidentally, Smith said about Trump: "This president has no business showing up in New York City. I am dead serious. It is selfish. It is narcissistic. It is ridiculous that he is coming to this game." And Trump took the low road.
Was Smith being racist by calling him "selfish" and "narcissistic," or does only one race get to use the tired racism cudgel?
Smith is not a simp. He is a better man than most, unless your definition of "simp" is refusing to play victim and telling the truth.
Well, based on your spelling and ability to write he might very well call you low IQ. Are you also unable to process my point which is that he took the "high road" and spoke truth. It my have been a bit abstract for a simpleton such as yourself but the implication is that Smith is the better man.
You putting yourself in the same category as Stephen A. Smith is laughable.
Having lived and worked in medicine in two countries with “universal healthcare,” one of the biggest hurdles in getting the U.S. to adopt a similar single-payer system is physician and medical support staff compensation.
In the United States, physicians earn an average of about $350,000–$380,000 per year. In the countries I lived in, doctors typically make one-third to one-fourth of that amount. I’m confident the American Medical Association (AMA) and specialty societies will not allow that kind of pay cut. It is humorous to see Bernie fight for Nursing pay while supporting an initiative that would likely cut Nursing pay 25-50 percent.
We had friends in Italy who were both physicians, yet they lived in a modest house and owned just one economy car, which was the norm for dual-physician households there. In Japan, I asked a pediatrician how many patients he saw per day. He casually replied “at times 100.” In our U.S. practice, we weren’t even close to our goal of 20 patients per day.
Additionally, in both Japan and Italy, patients were treated as patients, not customers as an example families were expected to stay with patient and take care of acivities of daily living .
@ewarren The people who created and have the intellect to understand AI are precisely those who should control it, as opposed to you imbeciles who think giving free stuff to people for doing nothing is investing in them.
IInsurance would not cover stem cell therapy for vanity or anti-aging purposes anyway. Whether you have insurance or not, it is not FDA-approved for that use. Even if it were approved, it would still not be covered because it’s considered “cosmetic.” This makes the point of your earlier post irrelevant.
You’re a multi-millionaire with an estimated net worth of roughly $11–26 million. You can easily afford health insurance and to pay out of pocket for these unproven, flaky stem cell treatments.
You are a real dingbat, we are lucky that you are currupt and stuck around just long enough to get rich.
Having lived and worked in medicine in two countries with “universal healthcare,” one of the biggest hurdles in getting the U.S. to adopt a similar single-payer system is physician and medical support staff compensation.
In the United States, physicians earn an average of about $350,000–$380,000 per year. In the countries I lived in, doctors typically make one-third to one-fourth of that amount. I’m confident the American Medical Association (AMA) and specialty societies will not allow that kind of pay cut. It is humorous to see Bernie fight for Nursing pay while supporting an initiative that would likely cut Nursing pay 25-50 percent.
We had friends in Italy who were both physicians, yet they lived in a modest house and owned just one economy car, which was the norm for dual-physician households there. In Japan, I asked a pediatrician how many patients he saw per day. He casually replied “at times 100.” In our U.S. practice, we weren’t even close to our goal of 20 patients per day.
Additionally, in both Japan and Italy, patients were treated as patients, not customers as an example families were expected to stay with patient and take care of acivities of daily living .
Having lived and worked in medicine in two countries with “universal healthcare,” one of the big and practical reasons I don’t believe the U.S. will adopt a similar single-payer system is physician compensation.
In the United States, physicians earn an average of about $350,000–$380,000 per year. In the countries I lived in, doctors typically make one-third to one-fourth of that amount. I’m confident the American Medical Association (AMA) and specialty societies will not allow that kind of pay cut.
We had friends in Italy who were both physicians, yet they lived in a modest house and owned just one economy car, which was the norm for dual-physician households there.
In Japan, I asked a pediatrician how many patients he saw per day. He casually replied “at times 100.” In our U.S. practice, we weren’t even close to our goal of 20 patients per day.
Additionally, in both Japan and Italy, patients were treated as patients, not customers as an example families were expected to stay with patient and take care of acivities of daily living .
Could you help us people who do not believe that the government should be confiscating money legally earned through hard work and risk-taking from citizens who actually contribute so much to the country, only to give it to people who have done nothing to earn it, many of whom are net takers?
I surmise the truth is that Democrats could not care less about those in need but have realized that splitting the country and bribing people with free things is the only way to stay in power.
Graduating from Harvard does not preclude anyone from being “stupid,” and graduating from Harvard with a law degree actually tips the scale toward the possibility that you might be.On that note, Trump did not call Obama a “stupid son of a bitch.”
What he actually said, which was probably accurate, was:
"And you know what the Iranians did? They laughed at Obama, and they said, ‘He’s a stupid son of a bitch.’”
t’s nuanced but meaningfully different. He attributed the insult to the Iranians, who took his money and continued building their nuclear program.
Why do you think other people, in this instance Elon Musk, need to pay for other people's three and four year olds? I just don't understand that mindset.
I don't think you actually care about other people. Splitting the country and promising voters free stuff seems to be the only way to keep your job.