New postdoc position with the LEVANTE project! We're looking for someone with language development / reading knowledge to help work on our international adaptations of language assessments. Please forward to interested candidates!
Introducing LEVANTE, a project for measuring children's developmental and learning variability around the world! LEVANTE provides a measurement platform with data flowing to an open repository. Call for proposals coming soon from @Foundation_JF.
https://t.co/rC5xn3RQ2Y
We have a 6 month RA position available. Closing date is very soon – 7th Jan and we need someone to start asap.
The role will mainly involve data collection and analysis for language experiments using children. Both online and in-school:
https://t.co/sWkniNKQyb
Publication Day!
Moving experimental psychology online: How to obtain high quality data
I hope this will be useful
https://t.co/xB6RLqKSaW
@EP_UCL@UCLPALS
How can we ensure our data is generated by humans?
Our new preprint shows that
>30% of crowd workers used LLMs on a text summarization task on Prolific
>This is similar to previous figures on less vetted MTurk
>Mitigation strategies can reduce use >50%
📜https://t.co/V2AOw347bA
Please do some crosswords for science! https://t.co/hOlwx52NAy
We're studying how people solve xwords, and we are looking for solvers of all experience levels: from novices to ACPTers. High-quality puzzles generously provided by the wonderful https://t.co/OSzFSiG8oU team.
Children Helping Science and Lookit are officially merging!
If you (would like to) run studies over the internet with babies, toddlers, kids of any age, teens, or parents/guardians, let's talk! We are aiming to make this a hub for all kinds of remote research.
Children Helping Science is relaunching!
We are merging with the Lookit platform (https://t.co/RwBoEQ8XzT) to create a central hub for remote studies for babies & children.
Zoom studies? ✅
Surveys? ✅
Any link? ✅
Advertising elsewhere? ✅
Bring them on over! 🧵
Come work with us! Lookit is hiring a software engineer to implement psych data standards. Based in MA (MIT) or remote (US only). Fantastic working environment and supervisor 😀
🚨Psych-DS is hiring! 🚨
We are looking for a software engineer to build validation tools (Python, R, Javascript/client side browser) for a technical specification/data standard for behavioral datasets
Details in thread, application here: https://t.co/o6ljnUux2n
Well, about four months later... DataPipe is ready!
https://t.co/zEIWxr4TLu
DataPipe lets you send data from an online experiment to the OSF. You can:
(1) Have born-open, transparent data collection (a la Rouder 2015)
(2) Host an online experiment for free.
Well, about four months later... DataPipe is ready!
https://t.co/zEIWxr4TLu
DataPipe lets you send data from an online experiment to the OSF. You can:
(1) Have born-open, transparent data collection (a la Rouder 2015)
(2) Host an online experiment for free.
Which brain networks do we need to understand challenging sentences? It depends on the whether words are difficult to perceive or have ambiguous meanings. Work from @Lucy_MacG of @mrccbu with @DrMattDavis @ev_fedorenko@JenniRodd@BeckyAGilbert@jneurolang
https://t.co/zAoRXPqVCe
Something really special: We have a 4-year postdoc position open, using neuroimaging to study potentially hidden cognitive abilities in non-speaking autism. M/EEG, decoding, receptive language, cognitive control https://t.co/UBQ88I7oYy DM @AlexWoolgar to chat. Please RT!
@joshdeleeuw Yes that would solve the problem!
I didn't realize that OSF files can be private and that data can be fully deleted (rather than persisting in version history) 👍
@joshdeleeuw Cool idea!! I'd be concerned about the data going straight to osf bc of privacy/anonymity. I used to remove some parts of data before sharing it - usually prolific ID (to prevent linking data across expts) and any free-text responses (can be unintentionally identifying).