I'm sorry, Meghan Markle has some serious questions to answer. I have posted some points below because I don't have enough word count to vent how I feel ๐All comments welcome.
@helenlifel55 I'm sick of making the same points. What kind of person fails to act on an allegation of child abuse? Did she ever follow up? She protected her own children but remained silent about what she had been told. How many children were allegedly abused during her silence?
@TheWoolPainter Burning Questions.
What kind of person fails to act on an allegation of child abuse? Did she ever follow this up? She protected her own children but remained silent about what she had been told. How many children were allegedly abused during that silence?
@Agboma5@Olga03713154 The alleged letter was received 3 months after she wed Harry. The kids weren't born that's correct. My problem is why she stayed silent for 8 years. If the letter was serious enough to protect her now kids then why not warn others? Why did she stay silent?
โIf Markle became estranged from her dad because of a letter she received in 2018, why was Harry blaming himself for the estrangement in their Netflix show in 2022โEither:
1. He didn't know about the letter or
2. She's lying and it never existed.
Thoughts anyone..โ
@honeythewitch@LondonFano90504 Exactly! Or the part where Harry said in their NF series that Meg lost her dad because of him (Harry)...and that was 4 years after she received that alleged letter.
โ๏ธMarkle's Statement:
2018: Letter shared; response: โItโs being investigated.โ
2018โ2026: Silence.
Eight years, no updates, and a clear double standard: if the issue was serious enough to keep her children away, why did she not pursue it to ensure other children were protected?
@hilltopjennifer Is she making this up because she knows her silence is damning? If these allegations turn out to be true, then Markle protected her own kids whilst failing to help protect others... for EIGHT years! You can't hide behind 'legal advice' when children are at risk.
@TheRoyal_TEA_ She protected her own children yet chose to remain silent on the potential risk to others. Citing 'following legal advice' doesn't work. When it comes to child protection duty of care ALWAYS comes first. How many children were allegedly abused during the 8 years she was silent?
@s080507@LRichmond78@QLoTII They can't see the double standard of her protecting her children whilst remaining silent on the alleged risk to others. It won't wash...it's called duty of care or be damned.
@LRichmond78@s080507@QLoTII If there was no evidence she obviously thought he was a risk because that's the reason she's given for their estrangement. She had a duty of care to warn others but she chose to remain silent when other children were allegedly at risk. Dreadful.
So Markle protected her kids, cited "legal advice," and stayed silent for 8 years?
Convenient how the law only matters when it excuses inaction on alleged conduct which may have protected other children. Sorry Markle, your PR spin won't wash.
@KalimeroKalo@LRichmond78@QLoTII A few words for you...as a US citizen she could have passed this to US authorities. She said it was being investigated yet in 8 years...nothing happened, why? She protected her own kids yet remained silent when she could have warned others.
@s080507@LRichmond78@QLoTII Exactly! She protected her own children but remained silent on the potential risk to others? When it became obvious no action was taken following the so-called 'investigation' then we ALL have a duty of care in these circumstances..Markle included.
@laffinmama@NannyGreenThumb This wonโt shift public perception the way she hopes, and the hardest questions remain unanswered.
If no action followed the investigation, why choose silence? She moved fast to shield her own kids, while leaving every other family exposed. Why?