Trainee business analyst; researcher. EVs and national/international security.
Anonymous account, so views do tend to be my own unless I say otherwise.
In the context of recent publications warning of attempts to use AI models for research into pathogens that could support viable bioweapon programmes, this doesn't come across as naive at all.
https://t.co/xyIx4sVWcZ
No, I don't think any tech companies or governments have sufficient grasp of the potential for AI misuse yet to consistently and comprehensively mitigate those risks.
In the context of recent publications warning of attempts to use AI models for research into pathogens that could support viable bioweapon programmes, this doesn't come across as naive at all.
https://t.co/xyIx4sVWcZ
NVIDIA just helped put predicted 3D protein structures for 2,800+ viruses into the open AlphaFold database.
The project is BioNeMo (Nvidia's biology AI platform) plus DeepMind plus EMBL, and it's aimed at getting ready for the next pandemic before it starts. AlphaFold DB is now past 260 million predictions.
$NVDA isn't only selling GPUs for chatbots. It's turning into infrastructure for biology too. Long $NVDA since 2019.
#AI #BioTech
Source: https://t.co/VaxSEIgaUl
I think it's the responsibility of their supporters to use whatever ounce of leverage they have to inform said party that this is not orthodox treatment of an investigation, nor of the authorities that hold the jurisdiction for carrying it out.
So to be clear Richard. Under a Reform government you will order the security services to release the identity, motive and route into the UK of any terror suspect within 14 hours of a terror incident. Regardless of the status of the investigation.
I purposefully avoid media furore whenever incidents like this occur because the conjecture is mind-numbingly pointless. But supposedly legitimate political parties calling on social media for disclosure of investigation details is disturbing and warrants attention.
You know that Farage is running out of arguments when he starts calling for sensitive information to be released within hours of a serious counter terrorism incident. And their identities alone tell us the square root of sod all about how they came here and who they work for.
I love my kids. Really, really love them. But I'm so jealous of people who have time to spend sitting around in pyjamas, watching a film in the afternoon that isn't fuckin Toy Story, and having a half arsed wank.
Right, let's knock this on the head now. If you're calling for the security services to release details about the identities of the suspects of an ongoing terror investigation less than 24 hours after the alleged attack, you're a moron. And you have no business even pretending to be a candidate for high public office.
Going to say it again. Reform are graphically demonstrating how they are completely unfit for high office. Can you imagine these people being in charge of our security services, or having to actually deal with a major terrorist incident.
So to be clear Richard. Under a Reform government you will order the security services to release the identity, motive and route into the UK of any terror suspect within 14 hours of a terror incident. Regardless of the status of the investigation.
You know that Farage is running out of arguments when he starts calling for sensitive information to be released within hours of a serious counter terrorism incident. And their identities alone tell us the square root of sod all about how they came here and who they work for.
This benefits members of the Magnificent Seven US tech companies. The current administration's pressure on Taiwan to develop US-domiciled fabs directly relates to that Taiwanese dependency for semiconductors; the future of the US economy depends on it.https://t.co/HI7RS7LKRP
- in the context of "Preventing conflict... in the Indo-Pacific", and most specifically, "deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving
military overmatch" (basically, maintain a defence status so vast/imposing that China wouldn't bother trying).
Even a coercive takeover of Taiwan would not give China frontier chip capability. TSMC’s advanced fabs rely on:
- ASML EUV tools (Netherlands)
- Japanese chemicals and DUV tools
- US EDA software
- Korean HBM memory
- Foreign engineers
4) Taiwan in the NSS 2025 is referenced in relation to its "dominance in semiconductor production." This is particularly noteworthy, because the CHIPS Act was set up by the Biden administration to relieve reliance upon Taiwan and develop domestic US production of semiconductors.
Framing Taiwan as a key economic component in US supply chains and as a trade partner in the NSS 2025, while not mentioning it once in the military context of the NDS 2026 where it has been specifically referenced previously, sends a pretty terrible revised strategic signal.
This means it remains far behind US companies like Nvidia and loses its outright leverage over supply. Presumably why there are the enforced pinch points in China right now as Beijing makes its domestic fabs dig in, refusing to allow uptake of H200 etc. chips.