@Bob16747466@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz@NessaMacLeod 😑 i’ve had multiple conversations with review previously and senior previous comments on other posts. It’s very clear that no matter what I will say your stance is very fitted.
La prostitution des mineurs en France en hausse de 43 % en quatre ans. 94 % sont « des femmes, des filles de plus en plus jeunes »
https://t.co/HfvwtianSa
Translation = I don’t believe sex workers deserve safe spaces to work from so I’m going to compare you to someone who did atrocities to women who did not consent who were trafficked.
Completely mixing the two is very dangerous for sex workers and trafficked victims
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz That document shows a local Amnesty group proposing a motion in 2008 that’s how internal democracy works in large organisations. It doesn’t mean he wrote or controlled Amnesty’s final policy, which was developed eight years later through global research, consultation, and voting.
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz Submitting input during a consultation isn’t the same as writing a policy. Amnesty’s position came from a multi-year process involving global research, internal review, and voting.
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz HIV risk is driven by things like condom negotiation, access to healthcare, and the ability to refuse clients. That’s exactly what decriminalisation improves. If the issue is that some clients pay more for condomless sex, the question is which system gives workers more power to
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz Higher STI rates in sex work are well documented but that doesn’t prove the work itself is inherently unsafe, it shows how unsafe the conditions can be under criminalisation and marginalisation.
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz If having a position invalidates research,then no policy evaluation in any field would be valid. And listing organisations on either side doesn’t settle the issue what matters is the evidence, not how many groups you can name.
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz Saying ‘everyone involved was biased’ isn’t evidence it’s a claim that needs proving.Policy reviews always include stakeholders, because they’re the ones with access to real world data.
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz and the ability to refuse unsafe clients. That’s exactly why public health bodies support decriminalisation. If the claim is that there’s a 10x increase and higher HIV rates, there should be solid data showing that but there isn’t.
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz That argument doesn’t actually engage with the evidence it just attacks institutions and asserts a massive increase in numbers without data. HIV risk isn’t about how many people are in an industry, it’s about working conditions access to condoms, healthcare,
@BrokenAndBrkAgn@NessaMacLeod@dollersthehoe@WitchyWomanRaiz One individual’s criminal case doesn’t mean they controlled a global network or wrote Amnesty’s policy. Amnesty’s position came from years of research and consultation, and it aligns with major public health bodies.