ai is not coming for your job
ai stripped you from debugging a ci failure for 3 days, or 4 hours of reading/trying out a library's exported functions, exploring performance steps, or wiring a strange protocol
ai just made it so you never ever enjoy intellectual work ever again
Sorry if I was vague.
Take a typical SWE. They are paid a fixed wage. All metrics are up (LOC, shipped product, tickets closed - you name it), but it’s not reflected in GDP, consumer value etc. because they haven’t necessarily made something anyone wants. Shipped simply because they could.
👆I think this is what we’re seeing right now
@CharlesD353@norvid_studies Yeah, so this version feels like the man that marries his cleaner and so she cleans their house for free; work done !== ‘economic value’
Yeah, I’m in two minds on this. It’s could vs should.
Loads getting is built, but not much of it has value to the consumer.
This will probably change but it kind of cuts against classical econ. Historically, market demand -> production. Now it’s like supply trying to force consumption
> . I suspect the reason they are is that they know open-weight models are effectively ungovernable, and they simply like the overall cloak of ungovernability open-weight models create over the whole of AI
I think it’s this but less philosophical and more selfish - they just don’t like their toys being taken away
I’m pretty confident that we could pause model development right now and the existing models, used right, would get us to an age of global abundance and prosperity.
I’m not confident the same is true if we keep pushing development.
@zeelee3D@MacrinePhD I agree with the precedence of strange, experiences - no doubt.
But it’s a jump to say we know consciousness is non-local - we don’t, we just don’t understand it.