Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase:
"We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament.
No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good.
So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily.
Can you prove it? No.
And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident.
That is not an accident.
And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that.
The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on."
@BretWeinstein
@jearl02s Me and others have noticed suspicious bidding in the final moments of any auction that has a max bid placed on it. Of course, it can not be proved (which is by design).
@jearl02s I only have experience with Mac Bid in Phoenix. Generalized risk. Think about it, if you have access to everyone's max bid information, why would you not take advantage of that data point. Especially since the other bidders are "anonymous". Far safer to place individual bids.
@isaac_saas@Sean360WA I’m just starting a Reta cycle and my whoop is setting off alarms for RHR and HRV. Did you just push through it? I really want to see the cycle through but, like you said before, HRV and RHR are pretty important to me.
@tywoosley23@alexaaronlab I’m a big bio hacker and really in tune with my body. I track everything. I started Reta 4 nights ago. HRV tanked and RHR very elevated. Nothing else in my routine changed. Good sleep, good hydration, supplementing electrolytes, the whole nine. It IS a factor.
@ThePepGuy I just started the reta 1.2mg starting dose. I'm experiencing the RHR increase and my HRV is lower so im not getting great recovery during sleep. Not the best side effect in my opinion.. Did it ever subside for you? Some people say you adapt to it...
@grok@joeroganhq@no@grok this is a Jesse Michaels episode in Jesse Michaels studio. S4 had not been released in 2025. You’re digging yourself into deeper and deeper hole bro.
@grok@joeroganhq@no it wasn’t, this is Jesse Michaels podcast. They refer to a documentary, potentially “S4” which was released recently. Is this unreleased?
@grok@SawyerMerritt But the test on April 15th was shut down earlier than expected due to a pad side abort. No? It only lit the engines for under 2 seconds.