@PaulEmbery Nonetheless, “a few right-wing bogeymen” is an incredibly dismissive way of describing literally the richest men in the world. But you know this
@TWBFarms Fantastic, I mean it’s not as if Reform, or Brexit, or UKIP, or Nigel PLC, now wholly funded by crypto billionaire exiles, played any role whatsoever in the single largest reduction in farm incomes in recent history.
@TWBFarms Brilliant. And by implication climate change is either just fine, or not happening at all, or inevitable, or something - anything in fact which absolves us from responsibility for our actions.
@TWBFarms@sainsburys I mean after all, hasn’t the chicken farming industry behaved incredibly responsibly with regard to the environment in recent years.
@NJ_Timothy Fine sounding but empty words. “On merit alone” doesn’t cover the culture and experience-based judgements we would wish from our judges. How would you assess a judge “on merit alonel”?(
@davidyelland@matthewsyed@BBCNewsnight Majority? I strongly doubt this. Don’t you think you should choose your words more carefully in the current context? This sort of thing gives legitimacy to those who claim to speak for “the people” from a far right perspective.
@Hughristics@GBNEWS@Benleo I’m sure you can point out the existing broadcasters who posited sitting right wing MPs as presenters, were funded by loss-making billionaires with clear agendas, and openly offered perspectives from one political quarter to the exclusion of all others. Thought not.