🇫🇷 FRANCE: THIS IS MURDER.
An unarmed medic was doing his job, trying to help people. Now he is dead, and the media are telling us he simply passed out and died.
Are we seriously supposed to believe this and move on?
The French media are downplaying what happened while a man who came to help others is no longer alive.
PLEASE, DO NOT LOOK AWAY.
This is France today. An unarmed medic should be able to do his job without fearing for his life.
Someone must answer for this.
The truth must come out. Those responsible must face justice.
On 9/11, the Pentagon was struck by a Soviet nuclear cruise missile, the P700 Granit. Not an airliner.
Find out why by following this thread.
Retweet to change history.
The ☢️ Missile Strike at the Pentagon on 9/11 /🧵
What really struck the WTC on 9/11? We've already eliminated airplanes as an option, which is a shock to anyone who lived through that day. We now have video evidence of not inserted planes in all footage of 9/11, but also the removal of another object. What the hell was that that "ball" like object?
Could it also be a composite? A deeper fake, so to speak? Is there any clue that could possible eliminate all other options? It's a ridiculous thought but, given what we experienced, we shouldn't make any assumptions and only work with what is real, provable and observable.
The real challenge of answering such a question is that the two world trade centres turned to dust, destroying the scene of the crime and most of the evidence with it. But we aren't out of luck, as another building was struck on 9/11:
The Pentagon.
Though there was obviously no wreckage of an aircraft on the scene, there is enough evidence in the Pentagon for us to determine not only what couldn't have struck it, but the only object in the world that could have struck it and left the damage that it did.
Unlike the strikes on the WTC, there was no televised composite film of a plane striking the pentagon, simply because the scenario required was physically impossible. The plane supposedly banked to achieve cruise speed at ground level and struck the Pentagon parallel to the ground. There is a very slow and low quality surveillance video that depicts this strike (which we will examine shortly). Yet, just from the satellite photos of the Pentagon, we can determine the actual damage.
So, let's examine three pieces of evidence based on things that are already established and known! With these pieces of evidence we will determine what struck the Pentagon and how it's related to whatever struck the WTCs and the larger plot around 9/11!
A. Penetration Depth
================
Let's do some math based on established observations. This is going to be necessary to other objects out, though it will be overkill for a plane.
The object that struck the Pentagon struck three of its five rings:
The E-Ring, the D-Ring and finally C-Ring when it stopped. The exterior wall of the pentagon consisted of ~13 centimetres of limestone and ~20 cm of bricks. Inside the Pentagon, each wall consisted of 25 cm of brick. The distance travelled to the end of ring C is 64 meters total. Given the 6 walls penetrated, at the perpendicular, that is a total of:
* 64 meters travelled after impact.
* 130mm of limestone
* 1580mm of bricks
* Six impact impulses
Even though the individual walls are not very thick or strong, that's a huge amount of material to eat through and that's at 90 degrees. And a very long distance from the first site of impact. If you measure the two visible impact zones, you will see that the object struck the Pentagon at an angle of 70 degrees to the plane. That means we have to divide the above by sin 70deg:
- 68 meters travelled
- 138mm of limestone
- 1680mm of bricks
The object was clearly on its way to the courtyard centre of the Pentagon and whoever planned this trajectory was attempting to penetrate the building as deeply as possible without targeting anything specific within it. Incidentally, the courtyard centre of the Pentagon was (and still is) called ground zero, a name it earnt during the Cold War under the assumption that the USSR would strike exactly that location during mutually assured destruction. There is even a hotdog stand in the middle of the Pentagon affectionately called cafe ground zero for this reason.
B. Pattern of Destruction
================
Despite being struck with this object, the Pentagon outer wall did not immediately collapse. In fact, close ups show very localised destructions, albeit very strong fires. 20 minutes later, the outer wall of the Pentagon collapsed.
Another important observation was impact shape it left: it was that of a single hole that destroyed a brick pattern around ~2 meters wide. This was evidence even in the C-ring. Keep this important observation in mind.
C. The Timeline
================
Let's place the attack on the Pentagon with all the events surrounding it:
8:46:30 AM - WTC North Tower is struck.
9:03:00 AM - WTC South Tower is struck.
9:37:46 AM - Pentagon is struck.
9:55:?? AM - First responders told to evacuate Pentagon perimeter.
9:57:?? AM - Pentagon outer wall "collapses".
9:58:59 AM - South Tower pulverised.
10:03:11 AM - Object destroyed over Pennsylvania.
10:28:22 AM - North Tower pulverised.
================
This is actually all the evidence we need from the Pentagon itself so let's dive deeper into the implications that every detail left behind.
/1
It has been exactly 23 years since the terrorist attack on 9/11. On that day one event seemed like magic:
How did the WTC towers vanish into thin air? Like a cigarette butt! 🚬
This question will make you RETHINK reality!
Forget jet fuel & steel beams. Think PULVERIZATION!
/🧵
Israeli Art: The 9/11 World Ending Ritual /🧵
The 9/11 event that struck the amazing city of Manhattan, NYC, changed the world in a very negative way, and is such a deep rooted inception that it has affected your life more than even the COVID-19 event. Yet, so many people are not familiar with the architecture of this terroristic art piece. You see, 9/11 was part terror, part specials and part intrigue, but all these parts came together to form one piece of art for those privy to what was really going on.
In the memories of the majority of people witnessing the horror of 9/11, besides the alleged hijackings and crashes, were two distinct moments:
(A) The people jumping out of the two towers, ending up splattered on the floor.
(B) The moment the two tower inexplicably collapsed and disappeared into dust.
Back in 2001, These moments were surreal. Like a magic trick where someone is sawed in half but gut wrenchingly horrifying because people died in the process.
Much has been argued about these events' physics, such as the real temperature on the floors (and people peering out of the tower seemingly unharmed), or the mechanism of the collapse of the towers. Yet no one considered that these moments, intended to be planted in your mind, were chosen with great artistic deliberation which reveals the true ritualistic intent behind the entire event. Every single detail was taken into account, even the date of the terrorist attack.
Israel Art Students
By now the Israeli involvement in 9/11 is largely accepted by the world. Yet what isn't appreciated by most is the true depth of that involvement.
Between 2000 and 2002, according to Fox News reporter Carl Cameron, the US was inundated with "Israeli art students", often posing as other nationalities*. Most famously, they were given residency in both of the world trade centre towers. One group called E-Team, the other Gelatin, both of which allude to explosives of some sort.
One famous group was attached to a company called Urban Moving Systems, who had a mural of the 9/11 event on their van while it was taking place. After their arrest one of the employees involved in this cut out told the FBI that the Israelis were extremely anti-American and bragged:
"Give us twenty (20) years and we’ll take over your media and destroy your country"
Indeed, in ~20 years time the COVID-19 PSYOP began. Yet, the Urban Moving Systems group are a distraction compared to the other two, lesser known groups.
E-Team was largely secretive but we will see very shortly that their involvement in orchestration of the event was undeniable.
Gelatin, however, were so proud of their involvement that they even published a book about it. We will study this book in this thread as it revealed the methods, the intent and even the artistic techniques used to bring a ritual to change the world for the worse.
It came in the form of two Tarot cards revealed on 9/11:
The Tower
and
The Hanging Man
These cards were not random choices. In demonic divination, the tower tarot card represents a sudden unexpected and dramatic change that destroys shaky foundations.
The hanging man usually represents surrendering to the flow of the world, and gaining a new perspective in it -- an allusion to Odin. Yet when combined with the tower, the individual card represents something else: sacrificing yourself entirely to make a larger later.
The combination of the two cards is the most dramatic and power "one-way" combination in Tarot divination, representing a profound, sudden shattering of old structures followed by an essential period of surrender, and a complete shift in perspective.
Which is precisely what happened on and after 9/11. But there is also a hint, in the meaning of the hanging man -- the hanging man is never truly in danger. Odin allowed himself to be hung upside down in order to gain a new perspective (literally, upside down), only up to the point where he was about to die, but no more. He came out of it unharmed, much as Jesus came out of his crucifixion resurrected from death.
Let's make four important observations, before moving on to the book by Gelatin.
1. The rapidly falling man on 9/11, somehow caught with perfect focus (😂) without his clothes flying everywhere, for some reason, decided to fold his leg in precisely the manner of the Hanging Man Tarot card. Pause for a minute to appreciate how difficult it would be to capture this short with smoke everywhere.
2. The South Tower collapsed just like the Tower Tarot card, which even depicted people falling out, the smoke and so on. It even tilted at the top, like the crown, before disappearing.
3. The two world trade centres were not identical. The north tower had a very large antenna. The south tower did not. After both were brought down, a blue light fixture and a pool replaced them, and then instead of building both back, a single tower which combined the two was constructed. Eventually the two are intertwined by the "One World Trade Centre". Why?
4. The day 9/11 has a special meaning, linked to the construction of the towers themselves. The number 9-1-1 was chosen as the police emergency number on January 1968. And on August 6th the same year, the construction of the WTC1 tower began. Why 9/11? There are two reasons, one historical, another artistic. We'll get into them at the end of the thread.
We will start by deconstructing the first two with the help of Gelatin's book celebrating the "art pieces". The next two observations, will bring it and everything that happened after 9/11, all together.
/1
* In the case of "Gelatin", Austrian.
My special 9/11 coverage begins in a few hours for the 25 year anniversary.
Things many have overlooked and the ultimate truth about Israel's 9/11 operation.
@ChrisRulon what is the interview regarding hot spots at ground zero? the guy doesn't know what it keeps being hot.
perhaps because someone-someone nuked NYC on 9/11..
Why do wars outside of the west matter so much to westerners, even if our countries are "winning"? /📄
It's the same reason the battle in Donbass matters to people in Moscow, and why the battle for Aleppo may determine the fate of Russia and Iran. It's the follow-on consequences of resolutions that determine a new balance and this affects everyone, not just the countries that are destroyed or "conquered".
So many people reduce it down to not wanting refugees. I argue that this is a secondary issue. There are far more serious primary issues. Every victory affects the balance of power between the regime and its people.
Conquest has always been very bad for the people of a country doing the conquering. It's counter-intuitive on the surface but pretty straight forward when you understand that our "elite" do not share. They just take the spoils and are empowered by each development while keeping us on the bare sustenance amount necessary to survive. They do not like to share because it would create future rivals in their strongholds -- democratically, any man can rise to power and bring down their gangs.
For example: This is why property prices are designed to always climb to an unreachable amount, and it's necessary for one to work their entire lives to pay off debts in order to have basic shelter. But there's more. In order to truly domesticate the people, the western regimes have implemented feminism to take away the last vestige of power males have in their country, then instrumentalize them to either work for the empire or die for it depending on their level of enthusiasm. Even going to university in order to actualize one's self and in order to try and create a family is turned into a road block via debt in order to get more meat for the grinder.
With each victory overseas, this beast is empowered at home and the relative power between it and the average man is widened dramatically. Meanwhile, its grip on women is dramatically increased as it can provision them with as many resources as it needs to to keep them on-side. To state things in the simplest manner, the state is essentially a giant harem and every committed man is a slave or (effectively) an eunuch. These enslaved men's value decreases with every new slave captured overseas.
Thus, we the men of a nation have antagonistic alignment of interests with the regime and its wars.
An unenlightened man will cheer his nation on and wish it victory in each of its evil wars. But consider what happens when a victory *is* achieved. Do they need you, as a man, anymore? No, their requirement of men decreases -- the defeated enemy is disorganized, their resources can be pillaged and their people enslaved. The victory is won and so the victorious army can essentially be demobilised. Historically, these military men are given stakes in society in order to keep them on side. They know how to lead or be lead, and are dangerous to the regime if they go astray. So they ensure that they're also rather unwise and immoral (though not stupid) before recruiting them.
As stated earlier, with each victory, the demand for men decreases, and the state doesn't need so many men -- but as it were, there will always be ~50% men and 50% women born, with slightly more men on average than women (the ratio is about 1.06-1.09). What do you do with the excess men. Well... you can always feminise them. And that's what we were seeing since the Soviet Union was defeated. Gone were shows such as the Terminator, Platoon and other masculine representations of men. In their place were extremely homosexual "situation comedies", "romantic comedies" and now media with severely inverted roles -- often outright transgendered people.
Those you cannot feminise you disenfranchise and demoralise simultaneously! You don't want them to have any power or stake -- but you also don't want them motivated to do anything. So you spread pornography and other time wasters, while spreading ugliness everywhere so they aren't motivated or hungry to fight for anything. Ugly art and architecture is one means to achieve this. A more essential mean is to masculinize the women. You do this through education, media-brainwashing and by having them mate like crazy with every single "high value" man, permanently destroying their ability to pair bond.
This is why we are facing the crisis in fertility today! It is precisely due to the successes of this neo-liberal order and its agenda. But all is not well. There is a dark cloud on the horizon. The Russians proved to be far more difficult to crack, and the Iranians proved to be resilient, so much so that the regime has started to panic. The Chinese industrial power is far beyond anything the west can muster. The US navy, its main power projection (other than terrorism), is rusting away.
Their demoralisation, feminization of men, masculinisation of women, ugliness of PoCs in every advert or symbol, was all done under the assumption of a quick victory. Syria was meant to fall in the summer of 2011. Russia was meant to fall in 2014. China wasn't meant to create islands in the South China Sea and it was meant to be chocked off from resources in Africa, crippling its industry. Iran was meant to be surrounded and destroyed from within. They were very unlucky that Assad held on, because all of these victories stem from the delay of that defeat.
So they're trying to apply the brakes now, just enough to get another batch of recruits for industry and for the military. They don't intend to change course, that would create a risk to their order -- especially because everything that can be looted was looted.
They need the resources Russia has in its territory, and they need to break all competitors in the future so they can rule over this planet perpetually. If you think things are bad now, rest assured that a victory for the western empire and its regimes will produce even more ugliness and inverted values in the future in order to maintain control.
Think of a farm. How many roosters do you need for all the hens? What do they do to the chicks that are born male? They don't waste any time -- they kill them as they hatch. You can imagine what they intend to do to us, should they have no external threats.
So, with this understanding, every single external battle matters -- each one brings the regime closer to its victory and the final conclusion of it.
Furthermore, the ability to recruit idiots and have them normalise the masculinisation of women/feminisation of men gives them temporary breathing room in order to account for the hiccup of their temporal geostrategic miscalculations.
That's why if you care about your future, you would be cheering on the SAA in Hama. You'd be cheering on the Donbass defenders. Hezbollah in Lebanon. Palestinian resistance in Gaza. The fall of Israel. Sudanese army against the RSF. China taking Taiwan. Best Korea reuniting with the cucked feminised south. And so on. Essentially you will be diametrically aligned with every single geopolitical goal of the regime.
You will also oppose every single social policy and work towards its detriment. After all, war is all about logistics. Breaking these down from the inside by making their re-cucking campaign fail helps your foreign counterparts far more than even going there and fighting on your own.
After all, what is the difference between a defeated army and one that is never assembled? The defeated army doesn't have to eat -- the unassembled masses do, creating an even bigger defeat for the regime.
So indeed, pay attention to these wars and pay attention to their social campaigns. When someone like Nick Fuentes is attacked by the National Endowment for Democracy, start paying attention and asking yourself: Why? Why the hell are they coming after a streamer over a forced meme like wifejak?
I'm not aligned with Nick, but I think he intuitively seems to understand a little bit of the grand-strategy at play. It's not enough to want to bring down the empire though, we must have a vision for the future. It cannot just be a retelling of the past, we have to account for all the permanent damage these incompetent morons have done. We have to repair "science" and repair our social fabric. We have to repair morality and eject out all the lies leading us to this reality by so-called "religious leaders". We may have to be cruel too, but I'll leave that for you to think about.
We need a real goal and we need to forge the ability to realise it. What we don't need are more f**king wars. What we don't need is democracy and civic nationalism. We have to reimagine the future and agree on where we want the coming ruins of our nations to head. We have to ensure the best rise to the top and are protected from the assassins who are ready for any scenario.
After all, the empire's victory will be our defeat, but the empire's defeat will be only an opportunity for our victory. Worse people can take over -- much worse. It's important to organize and to inoculate people from bad ideas now, and not later when we may not get the chance to communicate freely. We must reveal the truth at every instance, and ignore any short/mid/long term coveted interests we may have. Only the truth can free us from the tyranny of the unknown. After all, if they convinced you to be indifferent to the suffering of people in Gaza, there's no reason why anyone who fell for such an immoral viewpoint will ever feel sorry for you when it becomes your turn. It's a mirror as always.
With all that said, I hope it puts my overall coverage in the most understandable light possible, and why I may focus on science, social topics and history while the world burns. I've done all I could for these battlegrounds and I think the trajectory is kind of set. I will still be issuing updates when I can but these won't be my focus -- it's not that they are not important. It is not that I don't care about these people. It is important and I do care. It's just that time is running out as we head to the end-game of this collision course.
Thank you for reading and God bless. /End
This is all performative. Notice how they never remove the Soviet roads, industrial buildings, bridges, ports, electrical substations and power plants.
The Baltoids mentally suffer every day knowing that their whole existence depends on Soviet infrastructure.
Operation Odyssey Dawn: The End of Libya and the Destruction of Europe /📄
On February 15th, during the Obama presidency, the US launched a war on Libya through covert means. Using the Soros network and the city of Benghazi, a bridgehead for the destruction of the entire country, the US ran the most intense propaganda and psychological campaign in history.
I must mention that this PSYOP was so intense that yours truly initially fell for it, something I will likely not forgive myself for. I honestly thought Ghaddafi had suddenly went insane, mainly because I had a low opinion of his past antics and I thought the fall of the Mubarak regime was favourable to the world.
The right wing supported this war, as they wanted to see more Arab nations destroyed in favour of Israel. The left wing? They were the most disgraceful. All of them sold Libya down the rive and aligned with the "rebels". As John McCain would later reveal, they were just a cutout used for US special forces. Many of the people that now fashion themselves as being against Israel were instrumental in the murder of Libya as a nation. They just never talk about it anymore, but I hope the guilt destroys them one day.
The propaganda followed a typical Soros formula. It began with "peaceful protestors", then "Ghaddafi is killing his own people", then "rebels and transitional governments" and finally "air support/no fly zone required". It happened so quickly that it was bewildering for a nation that had remained stable for decades and was the richest in the world in terms of being debt free. Libya had the brightest future of all the countries in Africa and in many senses in the entire world including Asia and Europe.
It's perhaps for that reason that Libya was betrayed by almost everyone. The Arab League was the first and the most unprecedented in its dastardly action. There was never a unanimous against Libya, Syria and Algeria had vetoed action against Libya. This was a rule in that body of 22 nations, but it was forced through anyway. This became UNSC resolution 1973. Neither Russia nor China vetoed this bill. France under the covertly Jewish president Sarkozy (who had once claimed that all of Europe must become a mixed race, publicly), led the charge, bombing Libya before an agreed upon ceasefire deadline. Even Palestine* voted against Libya.
It seemed the entire world was in agreement about Libya over a complete lie created by the United States and Israel. The world thought Ghaddafi was unpopular but nothing could be further from the proof. It was the most bastardly thing the world would do, and in a sense, for what was done to Libya the entire world deserves to be destroyed. China had to move 75 companies out of Libya, and 36,000 Chinese workers, losing North Africa in one single month. The Chinese chickened out and didn't protect Libya, and this eventually led to the downfall of the Hu Jintao technocratic regime.
The reports of 10s of thousands dying in Libya were lies, amplified by videos uploaded on YouTube and Twitter. It was a full production of lies where rabid Arab youths would destroy their own nation for some pocket money from Soros. Browns would repeat these lies and cash in on them, pretending to be oppressed while being the oppressors of their own people. In a sense calling it oppression is a moral failing -- it was a murder, of an entire nation.
You see, the bombing campaign was not merely counter-force. NATO (which had quickly run out of ammunition days into the war) and the US aimed to kill the nation itself with counter-value attacks. Power stations were destroyed. The worst crime was Libya's water: Ghaddafi's Great Man-Made River, a 2800km artificial river project, was bombed until it was damaged. Then the factories that were repairing it throughout the war were destroyed. NATO still denies this crime but anyone can confirm it.
Tripoli was taken before the war was over, but Ghaddafi's forces never stopped fighting. The operation launched on Tripoli was called Mermaid Dawn, or Operation Sirens (according to Pepe Escobar). The reason for the naming will be made clear soon, for now let's continue with the chronology of the war and the crimes to follow.
Ghaddafi's hometown of Sirte wasn't merely bombed to dust, it was literally salted with the water of the Mediterranean sea. The reason why Sirte was flooded with salt water and destroyed was because NATO couldn't take it using ground forces. Ghaddafi's sons and their special forces were putting up a perfect defence in this city with its underground facilities filled with enough weapons to fight for an entire decade. But Ghaddafi failed to account for the possibility that he would lose the air and sea, and didn't create a run off system that would allow water to leave the bunkers.
Losing in Sirte, Ghaddafi was ready to surrender, but NATO wanted him dead. They wanted even the possibility of Libya rising again to be removed from any person's mind. So they murdered him in the most brutal and disgusting manner. He died a martyr for his nation, yet the brown filth who murdered him didn't deserve a martyr, they deserved annihilation.
No crime that could be done, other than the use of nuclear weapons, was done to Libya. If you understood what kind of country was destroyed (watch the attached video it will break your heart) you will see what a crime this was, for a world filled with the filthiest nations and their filthiest people (almost everywhere) to come together to destroy the one country with a chance at a debt free existence... how should the world pay for this crime? As it were, the punishment and the crime came together as a single package within the war.
In any case in 2011, it was claimed the war was over, but the war continues today as the nation is split into three. In the remains of the outskirts of Sirte, the "rebels" and "peaceful protestors" would use chemical weapons to kill other tribes. They then transported these weapons to Syria where they were used in a false flag to implicate the Syrian Arab Army and Assad.
As the dust settled around Libya, Europe would quickly be haunted by one of Ghaddafi's last warnings: If he falls Europe will become Black.
Name of Operations Reveal Intent
With Libya destroyed, the remains of the country would quickly become a rampart for economic "refugees" -- African browns, blacks and other unwanted people flooding into Europe to r*pe, pillage and steal its wealth. You would think that this was an unintended consequence of the war, but ... the names of the operation reveal the exact intent of those who planned it, namely Obama and Sarkozy: the target was Europe itself. For this plan to work, there could be no country where Libya was, it had to be destroyed so that no one could control the Mediterranean sea.
Libya, and later Syria, were the modern day Troys. Troy protected the Mediterranean civilizations from Asia. It's fall happened almost simultaneously with the rise of the sea peoples.
Homer's Odyssey speaks of the ruin the Mycenaeans and other factions of proto-Greek states after their war on Troy. It was a pyrrhic victory and all that remained of rich civilizations destroyed by the sea peoples.
Is it any wonder that that the Pentagon chose to call it Operation Odyssey Dawn? They claim it's completely random -- which by the way is a lie -- but then, in the later chapters of Odyssey, sirens aka mermaids would appear. How can they also accidentally call the sacking of Tripoli Operation Mermaid Dawn/Operation Sirens?
The intent was clear and the results also. Due to the fall of Libya and now the similarly catastrophic destruction of Syria, more than 5 million Asians and Africans have been flowing into Europe illegally. I would say even more "legally" using this inflow as a disguise. Europe is being destroyed using the most potent chain reaction known to mankind: foreigners multiplying in your own country and eating away at its boundaries and interiors.
Today all right wing parties allow uncontrolled mass migration through "legal" means. All left wing parties, in addition to this "legal" migration also disguise their action as charitable through the flow of illegal migration.
People all over Europe complain and hate the flow of migrants. I do too -- but let's be honest about something. These inflows wouldn't have been possible with the "original sin" of destroying Libya. Nothing has been done to make amends and atone for what was done to Libya. If anything Libya is being destroyed more and more every day and the fire is spreading.
Sudan voted against Ghaddafi. Today the UAE flows masses of weapons from Libya into Chad to be used to destroy Sudan.
Hamas lied about Ghaddafi. Now its leadership has been wiped out and Gaza is rubble.
China abandoned Ghaddafi. Now its economy is held under a double sided siege with the US (and Israel which it still supports).
Russia abandoned Ghaddafi at the drop of the hat. Now Russia's infrastructure is facing countervalue attacks and its military has been facing ruthless counterforce attacks from NATO.
The Arabs which conspired against Libya are all going to be destroyed soon as all waterways into their countries are closed by Iran.
Iran itself, which lied about Ghaddafi (over his own "original sin" -- the murder and disappearance of Musa Sadr), is hanging on by a thread and is being betrayed by those on its interior.
But what will happen next to the US and Europe for what they've done to Libya? It doesn't take a genius to guess, and only the nations that refused to participate are ironically doing fine.
Poland, on April 2011, refused to join the coalition against Libya. Today, that nation is the greatest success in Europe and has the lowest problem with unwanted invasive species (migrants). Germany pretended to be against the war as well, but was the main source of weapons and ammunition against Libya.
As we face the abyss of societal collapse, it's important to remember our own crimes against peace which destroyed a peaceful and successful nation. The very least we can all do is spread the word, not only about the crime itself, but the victim. The beautiful country, Libya, that was completely destroyed by our participation in a PSYOP and inaction against the criminals who run our nations.
On my part, after witnessing how quickly the mass formation psychosis, which I unfortunately participated in at least in words written on BBSes of the old internet, my own choice of atonement was ensuring this kind of war never happens to another country again. It is for that reason I had turned my attention to Syria back in 2011.
What will you do?
/End
[* As an aside, it wasn't just the PLO. Hamas would then condemn Ghaddafi and the Palestinian supporters would join its chorus. Later, seeing the "success" in Libya, Hamas decided to join the war against Syria and didn't just provide words but material and ideological support against the country. I commented at the time (2012) that we will soon see Gaza reduced to rubble as a result of this immoral act.]
If Iranians truly want to save Iran they need to get out in the streets NOW and demand a change of leadership to one that is willing to not only retaliate against infrastructure targets but erase entire cities from the map if necessary (especially aimed at treacherous Pakistan).
All these parades in different countries and cities are not just about funeral,it is alignment,message and declaration...those red flags don't just randomly show up in milion people,Iran is going to war..all out war and this is mobilization of ground forces in whole region
Wild video shows British cops in an unmarked car detaining a jogger with a Palestine flag because he “flagged up in [their] live facial recognition” system.
“We stop a lot of people that have done nothing wrong whatsoever,” he explains.
The rounds-of-attacks cycle with Zionists must be broken. This can only happen when a cost is imposed on them outweighing the benefits of their aggressions at a very large scale.