Je viens de participer au concours Swing Big de Trident pour courir la chance de gagner une Expérience ultime World Series™ ainsi que des prix hebdomadaires. Participez ici : https://t.co/OckP69foTA
Two questions for Dr. Taylor Marshall, who's blocked this account, of course: (1) Does this mean you now accept Vatican II and the whole post-conciliar magisterium, for which Leo XIV stands? (2) Did you not submit yourself equally to "His Holiness Pope Francis" for the last 12 years??
Imagine 'Pope' Francis but with manners, style, and character. That could very well be Leo XIV. Same deadly theology, but presented on a silver platter instead of a plastic tray from Burger King.
It will be terrible if a conservative Novus Ordo cardinal is elected, because it will throw things back to 2005, when so many persuaded themselves that the "restoration of Tradition" was now upon us and tried to make reality fit that narrative. Instead they simply got more Vatican II Modernism with a less ugly facade. At the same time, in the event a hardcore Novus Ordo conservative is elected, it will be delightful to see the meltdowns of all the progressives who since 2013 have discovered the importance of 'loyalty to the Pope'... #conclave #conclave2025
During my recent visit to the Holy Office archives I was able to find the actual text of this decree which some Holy Face devotion supporters have doubted. The text matches Beringer's summary exactly. Now I can finally publish all the research after 8 years and provide clarity.
Really, folks, is this so difficult? If you think #PopeFrancis is the Pope, you must (per Catholic dogma) submit to his magisterium. If you DO submit, you are in apostasy, at least in heresy; if you REFUSE to submit, you are in schism. This dilemma shows he cannot be the Pope.
🎙 Adrien Abauzit | Maxence Hecquard | La crise de l'Église est prophétisée dans la Bible https://t.co/7czsqUHw8j🎙-adrien-abauzit-maxence-hecquard-la-crise-de-leglise-est-prophetisee-dans-la-bible
This morning for some reason at Mass it struck me how unfathomable it would be to me to offer Mass "una cum" "one with" Francis. It would be a lie, because I am not one with him.
The religion he publicly professes is different from the religion I publicly profess.
He thinks, evidently, that Anglicanism is a good thing. I think it is an evil thing. He thinks that Holy Communion can be given to those living adulterously, I think it cannot. His church law (1983 code) states that Holy Communion can be given to non-Catholics, I think this is a mortal sin.
I am not one with him in faith, it's that simple. How can this be if he is a true Pope? How can it possibly be that in order to profess the Roman Catholic faith, one MUST be disunited with the "Pope" in faith?
He is not the Pope, nor are his immediate predecessors.
I wouldn't refuse to say Mass "one with" a man who was morally bad but Catholic. The unity of the Church is in faith, governance, and worship, not in another person's morality. But I am simply not united with a man who publicly rejects the Catholic religion.
Nous avons la messe traditionnelle à London, Toronto, Sudbury, Montréal, Québec (Lévis) et Calgary. Nous sommes prêts à nous rendre dans d'autres villes canadiennes si cela est possible. Si vous n'avez pas encore quitté la fausse nouvelle religion, c'est le moment.
1/11 What do Popes and theologians have to say about the objections to the sedevacantist position? Continued.
Objection II: Vatican Council I taught that St. Peter has perpetual successors; therefore, long vacancies in the See of Peter are not possible.
Answer: