Gnar 🐶

Don't anger the pupsters

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@OutNumberedmaw @nick_matau Nice ad hominem while completely dodging reality, you must be a Candace enjoyer

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@BeccaKrall @nick_matau @benshapiro Bro how did you get out of your straightjacket

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@AshPelt_25 @degguBgguB @SandfallGames Where is he the one questioning their values? Oh right, you have no reading comprehension and posted a meme about yourself, nice.

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@Devilmaydie666 @svenstoffels @SandfallGames You are if you can't tell this is satire 😂

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@lapincoqu1 @svenstoffels @El_Tocris @SandfallGames It's satire you morons

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@Chaltiergg @PlayRuneterra @davetron All 3 of them?

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

Let's defund the police, decriminalize drugs, and stop putting people in jail. What's the worst that could happen?

[Avi Yemini @OzraeliAvi]

🚨TODAY hundreds of Māori men and women gathered in Brisbane to ‘Haka for Israel’ forcing a pre-planned-pro-Hamas rally to change location for their hatefest

Full story coming exclusively to https://t.co/raxd1Kl5Gi tomorrow

@BrianTamakiNZ @DestinyChurchNZ

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

The split second court opens on Monday, X Corp will be filing a thermonuclear lawsuit against Media Matters and ALL those who colluded in this fraudulent attack on our company

[FactsForPeace @Facts_For_Peace]

This time, make sure to read the fine print…#factsforpeace

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

This bill is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

What it would actually mean is that if you disagree with the other parent about sterilizing your child, you lose custody.

Utter madness!

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@brumerc82 @WomenPostingLs No one has a problem, they are just calling him a cuck... Which is accurate lol

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@LaurenWhatevs @MarvelSnapZone @Kirallas_ $120 per year for a mobile game? No thanks, I'll stick mostly F2P 👍

[Dr Jordan B Peterson @jordanbpeterson]

Trans "women" are men
And all the woke whining about "misinformation"
Which in this case is just the simplest, most basic and obvious truth
Won't change that
To hell with you
You bloody manipulative narcissists
You've gone way beyond
Deserving any politeness

https://t.co/7maz9xQHPH

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@LiberalGenXVet @VivekGRamaswamy Please tell me this is satire...

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@BudLite_

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

The logic that Jackson and Sotomayor want to endorse essentially states that in order to rectify past discrimination, current discrimination must be utilized. Let's apply that example to baseball to see how idiotic and counterproductive this is.

Imagine, for a moment, that instead of MLB breaking the color line by recruiting the very best players from the Negro Leagues beginning in the mid-1940s, they had instead changed the rules of the game: black pitchers would now only need to throw two strikes to strike out white batters, and black batters would get four strikes before striking out. This would be designed in order to artificially boost the statistics of black players, making them more competitive in MLB.

Would this improve the quality of baseball or decrease it? Would it make for better and more competitive black players in the future, such that the rules could later be made the same for everyone while achieving "racial balance," or decrease such chances? Would it exacerbate racial tensions or close them?

If you argue that this was unnecessary in baseball because top black players could already compete despite the discrimination against them -- YES. That's the point I'm making. It's true in baseball and it's true in college admissions. The only way to remedy past discrimination is NOT present discrimination. It never was.

This is distinct from the argument that those who have specific damages from specific policies should be able to receive redress from those who damaged them specifically. That's basic tort law. What we're talking about is a regime of racial "correctives" that don't correct, they merely make things far worse.

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@krassenstein @unscriptedmike Examples?

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

Wait, we didn't prosecute Hillary Clinton because James Comey said that she didn't have the requisite intent to distribute that information abroad?

Well, probably we should prosecute Trump for taking documents home and hiding them in his closet anyway.

[Gnar 🐶 @BestDoggoGnar]

@EdKrassen @netnut123 Wtf are you smoking?