Bestie

Immerse me in your splendour 🇾🇪

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@StretfordPaddck @lauriewhitwell We’d have only loaned him out so it makes no difference. Maybe his wages? Case has gone so I don’t think there can be any excuses really.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@CaseyKrol Proper country.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@LBC @lewis_goodall @larabirdsnp Looks trans.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@Tracy20178 Look at the state of it. Deport.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@talkSPORT I can accept Rice and Anderson, if you want to play a certain way but Henderson before Mainoo? No thanks, send him home.

[🇬🇧 National Housing Party U.K. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @NHPUKOfficial]

To Hell With The King

He Has Betrayed Christ & Nation

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@AdamJoseph He’s played well, I have no idea what you are watching.

[Man United Media @ManUnitedMedia]

"I once spent a £116m on Elliot Anderson whilst still being investigated for 115 FFP charges, and nobody batted an eye lid!"

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@FabrizioRomano @guardian Pretends to be shocked.

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

A woman does not have a penis.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@UtdDistrict @garyjacob @WestHam Let him go to spurs, 3rd relegation in a row.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@StretfordPaddck I imagine we are waiting for them to agree a fee, and then decide if we match it or not. If it’s anywhere near £85m let them have him. If he wants us, he tells WHU and we match the offer. Did something similar with Cunha, didn’t we?

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@DanBurnFC He’d need his fuckin head looking if he said it about her too. She’s foul.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@EliotFowle Hahahhaa.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@MartienBall Paying £85m for a player with back to back relegations? Walk away, onto the next target. Nothing says the club ever thought we could get Anderson, so you can’t count him.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@utdHarryy Get in the bin.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@franchiseford Window has been open *checks notes*…..9 days. Relax.

[Cheeses Of Nazareth @OhCheesesChrist]

"We are committed to building a world-class stadium with our supporters, not just for them, with atmosphere, affordability and accessibility at the heart of our thinking."

Collette Roche

When Collette says "with our supporters", I'd genuinely like to know which supporters she's referring to. Everything I've fed back through fan surveys, and everyone I know who regularly attends matches, whether they've been going for a few years or a few decades, wants to stay where we are. Spend five minutes on social media, and you'll find plenty of others expressing the same view.

If the club insists that the majority of supporters favour a new stadium, it should publish the data supporting that claim and break that data down appropriately.

The club can separate responses from match-going supporters, season-ticket holders, executive members and regular members from those who may never have attended a game at Old Trafford. If the evidence genuinely shows overwhelming support for a new stadium, then I don't see any issue with being transparent and sharing the results.

At the moment, we're simply being asked to accept the narrative. If the majority of supporters really are behind the project, then show us the proof. Transparency would only strengthen the club's position.

It often feels as though the strongest voices pushing for a new stadium are those who rarely, if ever, attend games. Without data to prove otherwise, it appears the drive for a new stadium isn't coming from match-going supporters; it's coming from owners who still haven't properly explained how they'll fund it. Prove us wrong.

No doubt a lucrative naming rights deal will contribute, but what about the rest? Personal Seat Licences? That's hardly a solution that improves affordability. Then there's the proposal for at least 25% of the stadium to be made up of hospitality seating. As per this post, match-day pricing of tickets is spiralling out of reach for many supporters (https://t.co/zMxUgcypIs)

Let's be honest: we're not even going to sell out a 100,000-capacity stadium week in, week out, especially at current pricing levels. The club has already priced out many of the supporters it will need to fill those seats. I'm sure the business model has accounted for these scenarios, but I'd question the credibility of those projections when so many loyal supporters are already being pushed away from regular attendance simply due to affordability.

There's little value in Supporter Groups approaching this from different angles. The decision on relocation and the new build is, in all likelihood, beyond the point of being reversed. What's important now is ensuring that, as Collette said, the club genuinely listens to all supporters, but also recognises the difference between those who attend regularly, those who attend occasionally, and those who never attend but still have strong opinions on what match-going fans should want.

What we need now is a united approach from supporter groups: a coalition with a clear, consistent message. Rather than working against one another, they need to be organised and aligned, ensuring that before any key decisions are finalised, supporters have meaningful input and the club is compelled to listen, learn and implement in a way that keeps as many regular match-going supporters on board as possible. Risking that, loses so much of what Manchester United Football Club is about.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@JacobsBen Affordability my arse, look at the ticket prices already. They’re going to go down are they? Not a chance.

[Bestie @BestieNumber7]

@matthewdmarsden So the same politicians who have consistently failed the BRITISH people get to choose the new leader? Fuck that, general election now.