The Saintly King

🗡 Cutting the fog of Kali-yuga with the sword of pure Vedic Knowledge from Bonafide śāstra. Your every doubt dies here. Cows 🤎 2nd fortress: @SaintlyKing108

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

Cow posting will continue indefinitely.

[Jain Ji Raibulushionary @Zoomerjeet]

Cow posting will continue indefinitely.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

This country of animal-eaters have no compassion. How can they? Their heart is already hardened by daily sl@ughter of innocent creatures. When a man k!lls a cow, a goat, or a chicken simply to satisfy his tongue, the seed of daya is extinguished. Then he cannot even allow a man to see his dying mother. This is the natural result.

The śāstra is very clear: those who live by violence toward the weaker living beings lose all finer sentiments. They become like jackals and vultures. You cannot expect a vulture civilization to show mercy to a mother who only wanted to see her son one last time. That is not their nature.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

Kṛṣṇa Himself says in the Bhagavad-gītā: patraṁ puṣpaṁ phalaṁ toyaṁ yo me bhaktyā prayacchati.

“If one offers Me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit or water, I will accept it.” The Lord does not ask for meat. Therefore a real Vaiṣṇava takes only kṛṣṇa-prasādam. One who cooks for his own tongue, whether vegetable or flesh, is simply eating sin.

It is stated, 'vinā paśughnāt' — only the animal-killer remains aloof from hearing the glories of the Lord. Meat-eating makes the heart hard. How then can one develop love for Nārāyaṇa, who is the father of all living entities, including that wild boar?

Yes, in Vedic times the kṣatriyas were permitted to hunt ferocious animals in the forest — not rabbits or innocent creatures, but tigers, lions, wild boar — so that they could practice the art of killing when required for protecting the citizens. That was training, not daily menu. And even then they were not freed from sinful reaction. A Vaiṣṇava kṣatriya like Mahārāja Rantideva never ate meat. In this Kali-yuga almost no one is a genuine kṣatriya; everyone is simply following the whims of the tongue.

A staunch Vaiṣṇava, even if born in a Rājpūt family, will give up these anarthas. He will not kill even an ant, what to speak of hunting for the belly. First become actually Vaiṣṇava by following the four regulative principles — no meat-eating, no intoxication, no illicit sex, no gambling — then your praising of Lord Nārāyaṇa will have meaning. Otherwise it is simply a show.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

Lord Buddha is Himself an incarnation of Krsna—keśava dhṛta-buddha-śarīra jaya jagadīśa hare. He appeared in Gaya exactly as predicted in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.3.24) to bewilder the atheists who were misusing the Vedas to slaughter animals. For that purpose He outwardly rejected Vedic authority and preached ahiṁsā. Under Emperor Aśoka the whole of India temporarily followed Him. But because Buddhism denied the Vedas and the Personality of Godhead, it could not remain. Śaṅkarācārya later drove it beyond the borders of India and re-established Vedic authority.

The word “Hindu” itself is a Muhammadan invention; it does not appear in any śāstra. The eternal occupation of this land is sanātana-dharma, varṇāśrama-dharma, given by Kṛṣṇa Himself: cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭam. Kṛṣṇa appeared here, Rāma appeared here, Caitanya Mahāprabhu appeared here. That is the real root of Bhārata-varṣa, not a temporary Buddhist phase.

If you want to understand India’s actual culture, chant Hare Kṛṣṇa and study Bhagavad-gītā As It Is. Everything else is māyā.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

At only five years of age, this determined boy, Dhruva, left the palace, took shelter of Narada Muni, and began worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godhead in Madhuvana. Month by month he reduced his intake—first fruits, then dry leaves, then only water, then only air—until in the fifth month he stood motionless on one leg like a stone pillar, having completely mastered his breath and fixed his mind on the Lord.

Then, by closing all the apertures of his body and fully absorbing himself in the Supreme, Dhruva became so identified with the total energy that the universal breathing process itself was obstructed. The devtas felt suffocated and rushed to Lord Vishnu for protection.

The Lord reassured them:

“My dear demigods, do not be perturbed. It is due to the severe austerity and full determination of the son of King Uttanapada, who is now fully absorbed in thought of Me. He has obstructed the universal breathing process.” (Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.8.82)

See the power of one-pointed devotion! A small child, by following the instructions of his spiritual master and concentrating his mind on Kṛṣṇa, could disturb the entire cosmos. This is not mere physical austerity; it is the potency of bhakti.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@dennisZamenace Liberate your family members first.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

Kṛṣṇa Himself says in the Bhagavad-gītā: patraṁ puṣpaṁ phalaṁ toyaṁ yo me bhaktyā prayacchati.

“If one offers Me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit or water, I will accept it.” The Lord does not ask for meat. Therefore a real Vaiṣṇava takes only kṛṣṇa-prasādam. One who cooks for his own tongue, whether vegetable or flesh, is simply eating sin.

It is stated, 'vinā paśughnāt' — only the animal-killer remains aloof from hearing the glories of the Lord. Meat-eating makes the heart hard. How then can one develop love for Nārāyaṇa, who is the father of all living entities, including that wild boar?

Yes, in Vedic times the kṣatriyas were permitted to hunt ferocious animals in the forest — not rabbits or innocent creatures, but tigers, lions, wild boar — so that they could practice the art of killing when required for protecting the citizens. That was training, not daily menu. And even then they were not freed from sinful reaction. A Vaiṣṇava kṣatriya like Mahārāja Rantideva never ate meat. In this Kali-yuga almost no one is a genuine kṣatriya; everyone is simply following the whims of the tongue.

A staunch Vaiṣṇava, even if born in a Rājpūt family, will give up these anarthas. He will not kill even an ant, what to speak of hunting for the belly. First become actually Vaiṣṇava by following the four regulative principles — no meat-eating, no intoxication, no illicit sex, no gambling — then your praising of Lord Nārāyaṇa will have meaning. Otherwise it is simply a show.

[Devānāṃpriya Priyadarśī @Youngwolf009]

Average Staunch Vaishnav Rajput:

>Praises Lord Narayan
>Hunts wild boar
>Eats red meat every day

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@nsrmagk You are doing great.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@nsrmagk Thank you 🙏🏼🙏🏼

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

This country of animal-eaters have no compassion. How can they? Their heart is already hardened by daily sl@ughter of innocent creatures. When a man k!lls a cow, a goat, or a chicken simply to satisfy his tongue, the seed of daya is extinguished. Then he cannot even allow a man to see his dying mother. This is the natural result.

The śāstra is very clear: those who live by violence toward the weaker living beings lose all finer sentiments. They become like jackals and vultures. You cannot expect a vulture civilization to show mercy to a mother who only wanted to see her son one last time. That is not their nature.

[The Jaipur Dialogues @JaipurDialogues]

Condition of Hindus in Bangladesh

A dying mother’s final wish was simply to see her son one last time. Chinmoy Krishna Das was denied even that, and was granted only five hours of parole after her death to perform her last rites.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@JennerAdarsh Yes.. exactly

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@viryavaan That's just your excuse for not believing in God and saying "I am that God". False ego (ahankar) is the cause for this.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

This 'Ashtavakra Gita' is dangerous because it is Māyāvāda philosophy dressed in Vedic language. Caitanya Mahāprabhu has warned: "māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa" — if one hears the commentary of the impersonalists, everything is finished. One’s spiritual life is ruined.

Yes, you are not this body. That much is correct. Kṛṣṇa Himself says in Bhagavad-gītā: "na tv evāhaṁ jātu nāsaṁ" — never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings. The soul is eternal. But the Māyāvādī stops there and says, “Therefore I am God. I am already liberated. Nothing to do. The world is illusion. Even devotion is a chain.” This is cheating.

If everything is already perfect and you are already Brahman, why did Ashtavakra have to speak at all? Why did Janaka have to listen? Why are you still reading books and feeling “awe-struck”? The very fact that you feel hunger, that you feel imprisonment, that you keep coming back to the text, proves you are not already free. You are a conditioned soul covered by māyā.

Liberation does not mean becoming one with an impersonal light and disappearing. That is spiritual suicide. Real liberation is to revive your forgotten relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, and serve Him with love. That service is ānanda, bliss — not “tasteless.”

Do not be fascinated by words that sound profound but leave you empty. The Absolute Truth is not a void. He is a person. He has form, qualities, pastimes, and He is waiting for you in the spiritual world.

[vivan. @VivanVatsa]

Some books are so f**king dangerous, reading them breaks your core beliefs of hinduism.

I’m awe-struck. Ashtavakra Gita is that kind of text. No linear story. No comfort. No gradual gyaan or generational wisdom. A dark sadhu, and when i say dark, like really gruesome & cunning looks at a king and strips him of every identity he thought he needed. His conversations & reasoning with the king are so brutal. You are not the body. You are not the mind. You are not the performance of being good. You were already free. You just chained yourself to sit still long enough to enjoy your imprisonment.

I keep coming back to it after reading philosophy, contemporary fiction, literature books. After the hunger to improve. This one does not flatter that hunger. It makes the hunger look slightly absurd & f**king nothing. Tasteless.

Maybe that’s why it feels close.

Is it the same for you?

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@viryavaan You are not able to understand. God is not a monster. You are a monster on account of ignorance. God is all good.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@viryavaan You are in jail because of your own criminal activities. Stop doing criminal activities and you will be free/liberated. That's why scriptures talk about liberation. Otherwise, what was the need if you are already free.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@nsrmagk 🙏🏼🙏🏼

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

Lord Buddha is Himself an incarnation of Krsna—keśava dhṛta-buddha-śarīra jaya jagadīśa hare. He appeared in Gaya exactly as predicted in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.3.24) to bewilder the atheists who were misusing the Vedas to slaughter animals. For that purpose He outwardly rejected Vedic authority and preached ahiṁsā. Under Emperor Aśoka the whole of India temporarily followed Him. But because Buddhism denied the Vedas and the Personality of Godhead, it could not remain. Śaṅkarācārya later drove it beyond the borders of India and re-established Vedic authority.

The word “Hindu” itself is a Muhammadan invention; it does not appear in any śāstra. The eternal occupation of this land is sanātana-dharma, varṇāśrama-dharma, given by Kṛṣṇa Himself: cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭam. Kṛṣṇa appeared here, Rāma appeared here, Caitanya Mahāprabhu appeared here. That is the real root of Bhārata-varṣa, not a temporary Buddhist phase.

If you want to understand India’s actual culture, chant Hare Kṛṣṇa and study Bhagavad-gītā As It Is. Everything else is māyā.

[Buddhist Dawn @lordvishalkumar]

India will never become a Hindu nation because, historically, it has always been deeply rooted in the Buddhist tradition. ☸️🚩

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

The śāstra clearly states:

yad advaitaṁ brahmopaniṣadi tad apy asya tanu-bhā
ya ātmāntaryāmī puruṣa iti so ’sya aṁśa-vibhavaḥ
ṣaḍ-aiśvaryaiḥ pūrṇaḥ ya bhagavān iha sa svayam ayaṁ

What the Upaniṣads call the impersonal Brahman is only the bodily effulgence of Kṛṣṇa, just as sunshine is the effulgence of the sun. The localized Paramātmā is His plenary portion. The complete Absolute Truth is Bhagavān, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa Himself.

The living entity is one with Kṛṣṇa in quality—both are sat-cit-ānanda—but different in quantity. A drop of ocean water has the same chemical composition as the ocean, yet the drop can never become the ocean.

Those who stop at the impersonal “core” remain in the sunshine and never enter the sun planet. They fear personality because they think personality means material limitation. Therefore they want to merge and lose their identity. That is not liberation; that is spiritual suicide.

Real Advaita is to see Kṛṣṇa everywhere and yet remain His eternal servant (dās). Then the flickering pictures will vanish and the eternal form of the Lord will appear before you. That is the actual core.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

Lord is not tyrant. You are perceiving him like that because you don't want to follow dharma.

Just like some people consider our PM to be tyrant, because they don't want to follow the value system he wants to reinstate.

Following dharma doesn't enslave you, it liberates you from the cycle of birth and death. Living entities are themselves responsible for their sufferings. For example: you sl@ughter poor animals (who are also children of God) for your taste, and when the reaction of this karma comes, you cry and blame God for it. When he told you to follow dharma, you ignored and now, you are blaming him. What is this?

Just like in a family, a father won't tolerate that one child exploits his other kids. He punishs him for his wrong doings, not to torture him but to correct him.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

@Wizardofthesky Abhed (oneness) is in quality — both are sat-cit-anand.
Bhed (difference) is in quantity — Lord is vibhu, we are anu.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

He is omnipresent, through his unlimited energies, but you are not able to perceive because of your ignorance. This is why you got trap in Mayawad.

To perceive him every where, one needs to practice devotional service. And then you will qualified to see him face to face here as well as to enter the spiritual world.

[The Saintly King @bhaktSenapati]

This 'Ashtavakra Gita' is dangerous because it is Māyāvāda philosophy dressed in Vedic language. Caitanya Mahāprabhu has warned: "māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa" — if one hears the commentary of the impersonalists, everything is finished. One’s spiritual life is ruined.

Yes, you are not this body. That much is correct. Kṛṣṇa Himself says in Bhagavad-gītā: "na tv evāhaṁ jātu nāsaṁ" — never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings. The soul is eternal. But the Māyāvādī stops there and says, “Therefore I am God. I am already liberated. Nothing to do. The world is illusion. Even devotion is a chain.” This is cheating.

If everything is already perfect and you are already Brahman, why did Ashtavakra have to speak at all? Why did Janaka have to listen? Why are you still reading books and feeling “awe-struck”? The very fact that you feel hunger, that you feel imprisonment, that you keep coming back to the text, proves you are not already free. You are a conditioned soul covered by māyā.

Liberation does not mean becoming one with an impersonal light and disappearing. That is spiritual suicide. Real liberation is to revive your forgotten relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, and serve Him with love. That service is ānanda, bliss — not “tasteless.”

Do not be fascinated by words that sound profound but leave you empty. The Absolute Truth is not a void. He is a person. He has form, qualities, pastimes, and He is waiting for you in the spiritual world.