@infinitis_8 The pattern under all 10: nobody ever watched the app actually run. Generated code gets reviewed, almost never verified. Cheapest fix is making every change prove itself in a real browser before ship.
@Douglance The fix that worked for us: stop judging the diff, judge the behavior. Loose spec in, fine, but make the agent demo the feature working before you read a single line.
@piyushgambhir_ Agree. Demos generate, they never verify. We started making agents prove their work in a real browser with @kane_cli before they can say done. Brutal how often "done" fails.
@alexanderOpalic For the QA piece we use @kane_cli. The coding agent calls it after every change, it clicks through the feature in a real Chrome and returns pass or fail. Plain English objectives, no selectors. Your agent can read https://t.co/IrrsWbz9Mg and call it on its own.
A pass has to mean something. A fail has to be trustworthy enough to block a release.
Kane CLI is built for that standard. An agentic validation loop, from requirement to verdict, in a real browser, with proof you can inspect.
Try agentic quality verifier now, link in comments.
Hey, I'm attending #TestMuConf 2026, one of the largest software testing conferences from 19-21 August, 2026 with 50,000+ testers & developers. Register for free & download your attendee card: https://t.co/y71I2h02uv
Your AI agent says "done." Your terminal says "passed." Your users say "the checkout button does nothing."
That gap between code that compiles and UI that actually works is where AI-generated features quietly break. And it is growing as fast as agents are shipping.
Join Bhawana and Harish Rajora for a live product webinar on closing the quality gap AI agents leave in your terminal:
ποΈ Wednesday, 22 July
π 8:00 PM IST | 4:30 PM CEST
What we will cover:
β Why "passed" from a coding agent is not proof your feature works
β The structural blind spot every AI agent has: the rendered browser
β How to add real browser verification to agent workflows without writing test scripts
Register for free π https://t.co/wuKNCNi4sk
#AI #SoftwareTesting #TestAutomation #QualityEngineering #Webinar #TestMuAI
The European Accessibility Act stopped being a deadline on 28 June 2025. It became law.
If your business sells to EU consumers, this now applies to you. Even if you're headquartered outside the EU.
Our latest blog breaks down exactly what compliance looks like:
β What products and services the EAA covers (hint: your entire checkout flow, not just the homepage)
β Who must comply, and the narrow exemption most companies don't qualify for
β The standards that actually define compliance: EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA
β Penalties across member states, from fixed fines to turnover-based ones
β The deadlines that still remain after June 2025
The key takeaway? Compliance isn't a one-time audit. It's a continuous loop of baseline, remediate, re-test, and monitor.
Read the full guide π https://t.co/4c0fdmSJiq
#Accessibility #EAA #QualityEngineering #TestMuAI
@dotmariusz been using @kane_cli for this. it's just an npm install and you describe tests in plain english... it opens real chrome browser and verify your build end to end
Antigravity can build a full Amazon clone from a single prompt. Verifying it works in a real browser is still the hard part. π€
Kane CLI closes that gap. One command, headless Chrome, a 7-step purchase flow validated end-to-end. All 7 steps passed β with results synced to the Test Manager Dashboard.
The agent builds it. Kane CLI proves it works.
Get startedπhttps://t.co/C2MlwrBC6V
#AntiGravity #Google #TestMuAI #KaneCLI
$ πΊπππ π²π»πΈ --πππ π·πΌπ‘
Put your site, email and price in one file.
kane-cli run "go to {{website}}, assert the price is '{{price}}'" --variables-file vars.json
Reference values with {{blanks}} and keep the real values in vars.json. To test a different site, you change one line in one file. Not every test.
#QA #KaneCLI
Everyone loves building with Next.js. Fewer teams verify what users actually experience.
A page compiling doesn't mean the pricing is correct. Unit tests can't tell you what happens in a real browser.
In this demo, we test a live Next.js app with Kane CLI using one natural language prompt:
π¬"Go to the website, scroll to Pricing, and verify the Pro plan costs $19."
Kane CLI opens a real browser, checks the page the way a user would, returns a clear pass β , saves the test for the whole team to reuse, and exports it into real Playwright code β‘
The quality verifier between your Next.js app and your users.
Try it free π https://t.co/WhOw8nd6mJ
#NextJS #KaneCLI #TestMuAI
Someone built a Salesforce clone with Claude (Fable) in 25 minutes, then verified it end-to-end with Kane CLI in 15. π
Claude tested first with its own in-browser tooling. Good, but the output was walls of text and screenshots buried in a local folder you have to dig up yourself.
Point it at Kane CLI instead, and verification becomes something you can actually read.
Why prefer Kane CLI over in-browser agents:
β Structured pass/fail, not guesswork
β Real assertions (401, "no console errors")
β Console + network checks via DevTools
β Makes and verifies real API calls
β Shareable reports, runs unattended
Why a verification-first agent wins:
βοΈ Evidence you can share, not local screenshots
βοΈ It calls pass/fail, no eyeballing
βοΈ One prompt runs the whole flow, hands-off
βοΈ UI, visual, console, and API in one place
βοΈ Reproducible, auditable runs
Building is fast now. Verification is where you want a specialist.
Point your agent to Kane CLI for agentic verification π https://t.co/PPCu1XI44t
#Claude #Fable5 #KaneCLI
Now you can watch it think.
Give Kane CLI the objective, and it reads the screen, plans the steps, and verifies the result live. A pass it earns in front of you, not just claims at the end.
Faster runs, and full visibility into every move.
Register now π https://t.co/qdTmsrlT7I
#AI #BrowserAutomation #KaneCLI