Bi-Han

Go for broke

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@Kyoya653 @Angi88579569 @ChegbeE @AustinWave2000 @ManagerTactical That's why you either remove the covering of mouths entirely or make it a yellow.

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@JohnkGK @Bleeetal @WorkTheSpace He doesn't.

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@Kyoya653 @Angi88579569 @ChegbeE @AustinWave2000 @ManagerTactical That's the issue tho, you're banking on one players word against the other in the latter and when it comes to the first it's a reflex action, so instead of a warning your team is instantly down to 10 men because you covered your mouth and said I have diarrhoea

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@Kyoya653 @Angi88579569 @ChegbeE @AustinWave2000 @ManagerTactical It then becomes a maybe punishment regardless of it intended or not because you don't know what the person said. Hence a yellow. It becomes "idk wtf he said so imma just send him off." A warning is much better. "Idk wtf you just said but I'm giving you a warning"

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@Kyoya653 @Angi88579569 @ChegbeE @AustinWave2000 @ManagerTactical Don't get me wrong I understand the rule but 1. It's too harsh 2. There's too much loopholes because they can still say anything at any other point once it's not confrontational

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@siuuuuuu_RMA @CloarTyler @Ajax_Braz Then it's a his words Vs mine thing. Overall just a silly rule should be a yellow or just ban covering your mouth outright

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@NBradjordan @intelllec782 @Dasmajortuff @ManagerTactical So just ban covering your mouth. Simple as.

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@Kyoya653 @Angi88579569 @ChegbeE @AustinWave2000 @ManagerTactical Explain to me how that's a fair assumption? Guilty with no evidence? Make it make sense brother

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@BabatundeA218 @Josh57028110 @CaniSports The rule on applies to confrontational situations, so they can literally just say it during regular play if they wanna, it's a silly rule

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@siuuuuuu_RMA @CloarTyler @Ajax_Braz It applies to confrontation, what if they're preparing for a set piece and they say something racist? Is it confrontational?

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@ericmogendi27 @ImranQu07014300 @HomeEndHeros @ConnCFC Ik and I understand that but the amount of loopholes this rule has is so silly. He could literally just walk by and say something racist but it's not "confrontational", yfm?

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@NBradjordan @intelllec782 @Dasmajortuff @ManagerTactical They do it for privacy. Don't want the media channels clipping and exposing their personal business. So either you make it illegal outright or not.

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@Karlsn3 @F0RGIAT0 And that doesn't help stop racism. Cus they can still say it to players during regular play if they want to. It's a rule with a massive loophole, it's dumb.

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@Karlsn3 @F0RGIAT0 I don't think English is your fire language but regardless, having it during high pressure is dumb. Either you have it or you don't. You're allowing them to do it of course during the heat of the match they'll forget. It's a stupid rule.

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@ericmogendi27 @ImranQu07014300 @HomeEndHeros @ConnCFC My point is they do it so much during a heated situation it's going to be a reflex. That's the point. That's why it's dumb. Either you can or you can't.

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@NBradjordan @intelllec782 @Dasmajortuff @ManagerTactical You gotta understand, that's an easy red. You keep covering your mouth you think you're gonna remember when the situation gets heated? Hence we see what's happened today

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@Angi88579569 @ChegbeE @AustinWave2000 @ManagerTactical We have no idea what he said, and that's exactly why the rule is dumb, more than likely a reflex from almiron

[Bi-Han @BiHanBot]

@ImranQu07014300 @HomeEndHeros @ConnCFC So when they're talking to thier friends and they cover thier mouths are they saying something stupid? This rule is dumb. You don't know what they're saying and that the point, a bit of privacy on the pitch because anything they say can and will be used against them