@doctor_rahmeh My dearest sister
May Allah preserve you with Khayr and Aafiyah
These posts don't go well with your profile pic.
Its a contrast. Please change your pic
@Haqiqatjou sends his bot army and posts pictures of the Syrian government (whose lawyer I am not), but he doesn't answer why he went on a podcast with 20 half-naked women?
The answer is he's simply a hypocrite grifter doing it for the ad revenue (which is Haram money)
Clarification:
One must understand the difference between a non-Muslim and a Kaafir.
A non-Muslim: Someone who is not Muslim because they are young, mentally unstable, or the correct message has not reached them.
A Kaafir: Someone who is not Muslim because they rejected submission to God through the religion of Islam.
A person will not be punished by Allah تعالى unless they received the message and subsequently rejected it.
As for what “the message” is, depending on the person you’re speaking to, largely it would be:
1) The importance of religion - person specific,
2) Tawheed - everyone,
3) The belief that Muhammad ﷺ is the final messenger sent by Allah - everyone,
4) Anything that they may have misunderstood prior about Islam due to media or other portrayals - person specific.
Example:
Umar goes to John and says:
“Islam teaches to believe in 1 God and accept Muhammad ﷺ as His final messenger to this world, like He sent previous messengers to guide mankind.”
John says:
“Get outta here you Mozlem all you mozlems are filthy terrorists you just wanna kill us all!”
— until now, John is *not* a Kaafir. He has rejected *his* idea of “Islam” which is: Islam teaches terrorism and killing innocent people.
Umar then says:
“Actually, John, it is absolutely impermissible to kill an innocent soul in Islam, and terrorists have nothing to do with our religion!”
John then says:
“I see. Well anyway I don’t really care cause i think religion is pointless it’s just a manmade mechanism to control people, it’s just not for me bud!”
— until now, John is *not* a Kaafir. He has rejected *his* idea of “religion” which is: a useless, manmade mechanism to control people at large. He did *not* reject a message from God if he does not know that religion *is* from God.
Then Umar says:
“Actually, religion as a concept isn’t manmade, it’s to answer the question of our purpose on this life and what happens after death, and it’s sent by the creator of the universe through prophets to teach us how we should live the most beneficial purposeful life, and protect ourselves from punishment in the next life!”
If John:
-> Heard that statement (has the ability to hear),
-> Understands it (is intellectual),
—> and then he rejects it, then he is a Kaafir, whether he agrees with it or not, whether he thinks it’s right or wrong, or doesn’t align with him, or whatever be the case- because the message has reached him now and he chose to reject.
But if he did not get these basic necessary things clarified, then the message has not been delivered, and he is not a kafir.
And how can he be a rejector of truth when he does not know the truth?!
It only follows that they will not be punished by Allah تعالى because He says:
“We do not punish until We send a messenger.”
The “message” is not just “Islam exists!” and now they have to do everything else themselves. The message includes clarifications. The Prophet ﷺ explained and clarified and performed the miracles all to show he’s a messenger, he did not just start shouting “Islam! Islam! Islam!” and expect people to believe and tell them they will go to hell if they didn’t.
As for Imam al-Jifri’s words:
Nothing in principle was wrong. The only stretch perhaps - if it is a stretch - is believing that many haven’t heard the right message.
If he made a slight mistake in this regard, his peers will correct the mistake and move on— there was no mistake in principle.
But to get nasty and condescending in your speech, and begin insulting, and swearing by Allah, and then misrepresenting the position to begin with, and conflating between a nonmuslim and a Kaafir and applying his speech that is regarding nonmuslims, to kaafirs?
Character speaks volumes, and it is always coupled with knowledge. If you have neither, you’re an idiot yapping on X like most of these untrained people.
If you have both you win.
Anyway, i saw one response this morning that made me so angry so i wrote this explanation to clarify,
Salam.
Clarification:
One must understand the difference between a non-Muslim and a Kaafir.
A non-Muslim: Someone who is not Muslim because they are young, mentally unstable, or the correct message has not reached them.
A Kaafir: Someone who is not Muslim because they rejected submission to God through the religion of Islam.
A person will not be punished by Allah تعالى unless they received the message and subsequently rejected it.
As for what “the message” is, depending on the person you’re speaking to, largely it would be:
1) The importance of religion - person specific,
2) Tawheed - everyone,
3) The belief that Muhammad ﷺ is the final messenger sent by Allah - everyone,
4) Anything that they may have misunderstood prior about Islam due to media or other portrayals - person specific.
Example:
Umar goes to John and says:
“Islam teaches to believe in 1 God and accept Muhammad ﷺ as His final messenger to this world, like He sent previous messengers to guide mankind.”
John says:
“Get outta here you Mozlem all you mozlems are filthy terrorists you just wanna kill us all!”
— until now, John is *not* a Kaafir. He has rejected *his* idea of “Islam” which is: Islam teaches terrorism and killing innocent people.
Umar then says:
“Actually, John, it is absolutely impermissible to kill an innocent soul in Islam, and terrorists have nothing to do with our religion!”
John then says:
“I see. Well anyway I don’t really care cause i think religion is pointless it’s just a manmade mechanism to control people, it’s just not for me bud!”
— until now, John is *not* a Kaafir. He has rejected *his* idea of “religion” which is: a useless, manmade mechanism to control people at large. He did *not* reject a message from God if he does not know that religion *is* from God.
Then Umar says:
“Actually, religion as a concept isn’t manmade, it’s to answer the question of our purpose on this life and what happens after death, and it’s sent by the creator of the universe through prophets to teach us how we should live the most beneficial purposeful life, and protect ourselves from punishment in the next life!”
If John:
-> Heard that statement (has the ability to hear),
-> Understands it (is intellectual),
—> and then he rejects it, then he is a Kaafir, whether he agrees with it or not, whether he thinks it’s right or wrong, or doesn’t align with him, or whatever be the case- because the message has reached him now and he chose to reject.
But if he did not get these basic necessary things clarified, then the message has not been delivered, and he is not a kafir.
And how can he be a rejector of truth when he does not know the truth?!
It only follows that they will not be punished by Allah تعالى because He says:
“We do not punish until We send a messenger.”
The “message” is not just “Islam exists!” and now they have to do everything else themselves. The message includes clarifications. The Prophet ﷺ explained and clarified and performed the miracles all to show he’s a messenger, he did not just start shouting “Islam! Islam! Islam!” and expect people to believe and tell them they will go to hell if they didn’t.
As for Imam al-Jifri’s words:
Nothing in principle was wrong. The only stretch perhaps - if it is a stretch - is believing that many haven’t heard the right message.
If he made a slight mistake in this regard, his peers will correct the mistake and move on— there was no mistake in principle.
But to get nasty and condescending in your speech, and begin insulting, and swearing by Allah, and then misrepresenting the position to begin with, and conflating between a nonmuslim and a Kaafir and applying his speech that is regarding nonmuslims, to kaafirs?
Character speaks volumes, and it is always coupled with knowledge. If you have neither, you’re an idiot yapping on X like most of these untrained people.
If you have both you win.
Anyway, i saw one response this morning that made me so angry so i wrote this explanation to clarify,
Salam.
@HarounKanj@doctor_rahmeh Now he should make one on 12ver Shiasm
Which is 100 x worse than Wahhabism by every metric
But imami whores will be imami whores
Innit kanj
@doctor_rahmeh Although I strongly disagree with Wahhabi ideology and many views of Ibn Taymiyah Rahimahu Llah
I love this post
May Allah expose this Dajjal and save the Ummah from his evil