🚨 DAVE SMITH: “They framed Trump of treason … They locked down the whole country based on pseudoscience. They f**king covered up a senile president … How many indictments? Zero … That's not exactly what we were voting for.”
Here is an aside.
I remember like yesterday when Dr. Paul called me into his personal office in 203 Cannon with a draft of his famous "What If" speech. He had written it in his own hand and he asked me to go over it and clean it up a bit. Not unusual for how he writes: from the heart.
And afterward I spent a good deal of time in his office with a stopwatch making sure he could deliver it under the five minute rule. Shuffling the papers. What do we have to cut. Which paragraph could be spoken a bit faster.
I knew and understood at the time that it was a very special speech. No one as far as I know had ever done such a thing before on the Floor of the House.
It was incredibly innovative and made all the powerful points without being unnecessarily confrontational. It was meant to gain allies, not to punish adversaries.
Because that is how Ron Paul always thought when he was in Congress. The worst of them were not fools to be brought low, but potential allies awaiting the proper argumentation with the application of time.
"They'll come around," he said patiently.
And believe it or not, it worked more often than you might think. Being a fly on the wall as the organizer of his legendary Thursday Congressional Member lunches, I was privy to so many Members who would not dare say so in public but who dropped in for a couple of Gulf Coast shrimp and to tell Rep. Paul how right he was on the Iraq war and Afghanistan and the Fed etc.
The campaigns later on were so important and galvanized the Liberty Movement and sent it worldwide, but the kernel was planted in his unique and generous, kindly approach to even his most odious adversaries.
"What did Ron Paul ever achieve in Congress???" - they demand.
Well, he changed the world. How's that?
I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore.
This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.
Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.
@LibertyLockPod What's wrong with the Means siblings? It seems like they echo what RFK Jr. Has been saying for the most part and that they align with the MAHA movement.
In case you’re new here.
Here’s a throwback to when we discovered that they’re poisoning all of our babies for profit.
We didn’t even get to the formula, which is probably even worse.
So you can withold thousands of documents about a prolific human trafficking case from the AG, and she will...fire you. Wtf will it take to get prosecutions?
The FBI raided grandma's houses all over the country after J6 but Pam Bondi gave the FBI until 8 AM to turn over information about child trafficking which they've sat on for DECADES
Two tiers of justice. The FBI needs to be brought to heel immediately
This is so insulting.
The DOGE discoveries are not just about "wasted" taxpayer funds. The real story, the 5 alarm fire, is that USAID was literally funding an entirely hand crafted pseudo-reality. Not just in America but all over the world.
You were robbed to fund global psychological operations.
-Buying off media outlets
-Pushing advertiser Boycotts against X and Rumble as they attempted to decrease censorship
(AKA narrative control)
-Pushing war propaganda
-Funding opposition groups in foreign lands to foment revolutions
-Funding lawfare against the former president of the united states and his supporters
(I could go on for an hour)
People get caught up on the "$100K to study cocaines' impact on chihuahua" stories. That is not the headline here.
The headline here is:
The US government robbed you blind in an effort to control your mind
That's about as big as it gets.
NPR's "news" piece on RFK's #fluoride tweet fails to tell readers and listeners that an Obama-appointed federal judge found, after hearing extensive testimony from government scientists and NIH-funded experts, that fluoridating water "poses an unreasonable risk" to human health.
NPR also fails to tell readers that (1) there's no need to ingest fluoride for cavity prevention (from water or any other source) since fluoride's predominant benefit to teeth is topical, not systemic -- as even the CDC now admits; (2) a recent gold-standard systematic review from the Cochrane Collaboration concluded that fluoridation has much less benefit than commonly believed (and may have no benefit at all); and (3) the vast majority of Europe has rejected water fluoridation with no discernible detriment to their teeth.
But the author @gbrumfiel was able to find plenty of space to smear those raising concerns about fluoride - which he admits he enjoyed doing. #Journalism
@RobertKennedyJr