@the_schertz@RationalGranpa@scrowder And where has the Supreme Court ruled that not wearing a mask in public is protected or peaceful protest? Under your argument, I can deem anything protected protest by saying that the first amendment mentions freedom of protest. Screaming fire in a crowded theater is protected
@the_schertz@RationalGranpa@scrowder As long as you state that you’re not wearing it in protest? I thought you were appealing to your right to protest? Not wearing a mask in public is not peaceful: it endangers others. That’s why the federal government has not challenged the state mandates, meaning that not wearing
@the_schertz@RationalGranpa@scrowder Glad you’re at the point where all you have left to say is the insistence you have the right to not wear a mask in public, without any backup.
@the_schertz@RationalGranpa@scrowder It’s not a peaceful protest: it endangers others. That’s why there are mandates that require you to wear a mask in public. Until the Supreme Court overrules these mandates (they won’t), you do not have a right to not wear a mask in public.
@the_schertz@RationalGranpa@scrowder It’s not peaceful, it endangers others, which is why states have mandates requiring people were masks in public. The Supreme Court has not ruled that the mandates are unconstitutional. The mandates can and are enforced through fines and arrests. Supreme Court has not ruled that
@the_schertz@RationalGranpa@scrowder And where did the Supreme Court rule that not wearing a mask in public is peaceful protest? Again, the government can and does enforce the wearing of masks in public.
@the_schertz@RationalGranpa@scrowder Nowhere does the first amendment say that not wearing a mask in public is protected speech/protest. Supreme Court has not upheld that not wearing a mask in public is a protected right.