@pmddomingos@geoffreyhinton Predictably ad hominem. That a politically motivated disemboweling of world-leading research funding apparatus might raise questions of scientific integrity is not an “embarrassing” position to take. But of course you know that.
🚨Curious how LLMs deal with uncertainty? In our new #EMNLP2024 Findings paper, we dive deep into their ability to abstain from answering when given insufficient or incorrect context in science questions 💡https://t.co/2pAWkSwHN7
Joint work w/ @billghowe@lucyluwang@uw_ischool
@rachelmetz Agree, but I also fear the idea that because a paper *is* peer reviewed it earns free credibility. There exists unintentional gatekeeping, especially in contentious domains. Arxiv has been a positive. (Overlay journals are one underused tool in the toolbox.)
@ylecun@scienceisstrat1@altcap@Jason@chamath@DavidSacks It’s true that, like reality labs, none of those agencies generate direct revenue. But having trouble seeing how this comparison makes a favorable case for metaverse. It was a profit-motivated bad idea, sans any hope of profit.
@ylecun C’mon Yann. There are 100M active daily users of the plane in your analogy, and countless other mini-planes of the same design deployed in all kinds of contexts. For five years everyone has raised VC and their stock price by claiming to use a plane somewhere in their system.
@ylecun While simultaneously demonstrating the sexual objectification bias, to the extent that women can literally be rendered as a collection of body parts. Work conceived and led by @wolferobert3 and @aylin_cim with some support from myself and @yanyiwei_44 https://t.co/QU7vx5ot7p
@domoritz@random_walker@mmitchell_ai Well it’s not strict. The main thing is that the question of “does it actually work” tends to be almost an afterthought in CS, and I want to see that story before I slog through 6 pages of pedantry. Related: I try to understand figures first, reading just enough to do so.
This is a major milestone for US AI Ethics law. Brings in groundwork for:
- Safety
- Equity
- Data Rights
- Transparency
- Consent
Yay for @SureshVenkat46 and @kdphd 's work I know must underlie this! https://t.co/M0srKaAUM5
Thanks for the reporting @Melissahei