🚨#Important: Several petitions are now being filed in the High Courts and the Supreme Court “against” the actions of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
But we must not forget what happened the last time citizens knocked on the doors of the judiciary. The Supreme Court ENSURED that the SIR happened in Bengal in whatever manner barely months before the election. When the consequences of mass voters deletions became impossible to ignore, Justice Joymalya Bagchi in that bench made an extraordinary observation that those unable to vote “this time” could vote “next time”.
Who is to tell him that there is no “next time” for a possibly stolen election?
So because the courts are constitutional institutions, let them hear these new petitions against Gyanesh as many times as they want. Let them pass whatever orders they want to. But our democratic demand for Gyanesh Kumar’s accountability will NOT BE outsourced to the courtrooms.
The people will decide.
Because ultimately, neither an Election Commissioner nor a judge owns Indian democracy. We, the People, do.
@Cockroachisback@abhijeet_dipke@AshutoshRanka
The Election Commission Never Had the Bandwidth to Carry Out an SIR
The commission relied on an AI-powered application called ERONET, which, like other similar systems, could be prone to hallucination errors, writes @SnehasisMukhop4.
https://t.co/SLi9UTi9Yo
𝐌𝐫. 𝐆𝐲𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐡 𝐊𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐫 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐢𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲.
🔹We are not going to let democracy be destroyed in India and sit silent, and the people responsible for this are going to be punished.
🔹The two Election Commissioners have done a wise thing, and I appreciate it.
🔹 Mr. Gyanesh Kumar should think seriously about the position he's in, and he should turn approver. That is my advice to him. That would be an act of nationalism.
: LoP Shri @RahulGandhi
The most expensive part of a hospital bill may never touch the hospital at all.
A patient admitted for care has no way of knowing whether the price on a medical consumable reflects its actual cost or a markup fixed long before it ever reached the ward. That gap in information is, at its core, a public health issue.
A survey of hospital consumables in Maharashtra found an IV infusion set with a trade price of ₹11.05 carrying a printed MRP of ₹325 ; a markup of 2,841%. A syringe procured at ₹6.75 carried an MRP of ₹57.20. A catheter procured at ₹29.41 carried an MRP of ₹310.
These are not elective purchases. Patients cannot compare prices, seek alternatives, or question a number printed on a box while receiving care and the MRP itself is often fixed upstream by manufacturers and distributors, disconnected from the trade price by a wide, unexplained margin. The result is a system where the party bearing the cost has the least information to evaluate it.
The regulatory gap is structural: scheduled medicines are capped under the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 2013. Most medical devices and consumables are not leaving both the pricing and the information around it almost entirely unmonitored.
A review of these findings and clear guidelines on the permissible gap between trade procurement price and declared MRP have been recommended to the Department of Pharmaceuticals and the NPPA ; a step toward closing not just a pricing gap, but the information gap patients are left to bear alone.
#PublicHealth #GoodGovernance #Leadership #TukaramMundhe
https://t.co/Ye9CVzr8qU
“If you send me a legal notice, I will get you publicly noticed.”
Lawyers ask me to not take brand names, but I don’t follow what they say.
I never blur logos and always take brand names openly.
I don’t say “NOODLES”. I say maggi.
I don’t say “SOFT DRINKS”. I say coca-cola and pepsi.
I don’t say “CHIPS”. I say Lays and Kurkure.
And some food brands have tried to silence me with legal notices.
But as an Indian, I have freedom of speech. And freedom of speech includes the freedom to criticise.
You don’t create a health revolution without making a few enemies.
Let’s Make India Healthy Again!
ABHIJEET HITS THE QUESTION NOBODY WANTS TO TOUCH 🚨
Subhash Chandra reportedly had a ₹22,000 crore debt settled for just ₹6 crore.
Can an ordinary person get this deal?
If you have a ₹50 lakh home loan, will the bank close it for ₹50,000?
If you have a ₹10 lakh car loan, will it settle for ₹10,000?
That door never opens for common people.
Common people pay every EMI with interest. Home loan, car loan, education loan, everything.
But when powerful businessmen get VIP settlements, the loss does not vanish. It comes back to taxpayers. 😡
जब असम में लोग बाढ़ से त्रस्त हैं,
ऐसे समय में जब असम को प्रधानमंत्री जी की जरूरत है,
तब प्रधानमंत्री जी रोड शो में बिजी है,
ये कहां तक सही है?
और ये किसके पैसे से हो रहा है?
I compared Fanta sold in France with the one sold in India.
French Fanta contains around 4 teaspoons of sugar.
Indian Fanta contains around 10 teaspoons of sugar.
French Fanta does not contain artificial colours.
Indian Fanta contains artificial colours.
French Fanta contains real oranges.
Indian Fanta does not contain oranges and uses “orange flavours”.
French Fanta contains around 69 calories.
Indian Fanta contains around 168 calories.
Same brand. Same drink. Completely different product.
The question is simple:
Why are healthier formulations possible abroad, but not in India?
INDIANS DESERVE BETTER!
🚨URGENT STATEMENT🚨
The interim order passed by the Supreme Court of India in the batch of PILs related to the CJP protest must ring alarm bells across the country. In particular, Direction No. 4, which permits governments to proceed with existing FIRs and carry out investigations, raises extremely serious concerns.
This direction stands in direct contradiction to the solemn assurance and guarantee extended by the Government of India to the youth of this nation on 25 July 2026, namely, that the FIRs would be withdrawn and that no protester would be directly or indirectly targeted for participating in the peaceful movement.
It was on the strength of that solemn assurance, and in complete good faith, that the Cockroach Janta Party called off its nationwide protest.
We now have a credible apprehension that the Government of India and BJP-ruled states may seek to use and weaponise this order of the Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant to continue FIRs against individual protesters and subject them to great harassment. This was precisely our concern from day one: that courts could be used, directly or indirectly, to achieve political ends by targeting peaceful dissent.
Equally troubling is the fact that the interim order was not opposed by the government's lawyers, despite the Central Government being fully aware that talks/assurances with the CJP had continued until as recently as late last night and that a solemn agreement had already been arrived at on 25 July.
The court's uninformed order is therefore wholly unacceptable.
A solemn public assurance given to thousands of young students and protesters cannot be diluted, undermined, or rendered meaningless through subsequent legal developments, in a surreptitious manner. It only results in breach of public trust.
In any event, nothing in the interim order prevents the Government of India or the concerned BJP/NDA ruled State Governments from withdrawing the FIRs or deciding not to proceed against peaceful protesters, like done by Bihar and Assam governments. The power to withdraw or not pursue such cases continues to rest with the executive. The court has not mandated that governments must definitely continue with the FIRs. That would be a deliberate misreading. The Government must not invoke the Court’s order as a justification for reneging on the commitment it made on 25 July.
We therefore demand that the Government of India and the concerned BJP/NDA State Governments immediately place the terms of this solemn assurance before the Supreme Court in the pending proceedings so that there is complete transparency regarding the commitments already made to the youth of this country and so that the court can withdraw and make an informed order in the future.
The youth of India entered into this understanding in good faith. That good faith must not be betrayed. Institutions of constitutional importance must never be politicised and weaponised to not honour the guarantees.
The deadline for the Government of India to honour its guarantees expires today. We once again call upon it to fulfil every commitment it made: withdraw the FIRs, ensure that no protester is subjected to future punitive action, and honour both the letter and the spirit of the assurance that brought an end to the protest.
Failing this, and as previously declared, the Cockroach Janta Party will have no option but to resume its nationwide protest to protect the students and young protesters who stood up not for themselves alone, but for the future of this nation. A government that breaks its word cannot expect the youth to remain silent. If the guarantees are dishonoured, the streets of India will once again become the voice of its young.