Time for entire BJP and Modi Ji this time to show they can counter the Fake Narratives.
It’s matter of democracy .
It’s matter of India .
We are with you . Take steps . Aggressive steps . Expose them .
I still don’t understand one thing: if Gyanesh Kumar is removing people’s names from the voter list under the SIR to benefit the BJP,
then how does he know that all these voters are Congress supporters or against the BJP? 🤔
Road Airports Railways are made with Tax Payers money to use it one needs money and to have money you need a job.
Airports then get sold to 1 businessman.
80+ crore are poor and almost without food because of inflation.
You nah Diya Jalao.
This is why I feel pity for those who still support Congress/Rahul Gandhi 🤡
Rahul Gandhi in November 2013:-
“Their speeches are about roads, airports, railway lines. They never talk about the poor, about people.”
– If a politician has this kind of mindset, can they ever truly drive development or industrialize the country?
– Congress has been running with the “Garibi Hatao” slogan since the 1970s, and even today, it seems stuck in the same narrative.
– Meanwhile, BJP has focused on roads, railways and infrastructure while also bringing 26 crore people out of multidimensional poverty over the last decade.
– Development is not the opposite of helping the poor. Development is how you create opportunities to lift people out of poverty.
Dear Rahul Gandhi Sir, I am a very big fan of yours. I am a 20-year-old first-time Gen Z voter.
You always say that Modi ji, along with Gyanesh Kumar, do “vote chori” and win elections.
As your supporter, I have a few questions for you:
>If Modi ji really does vote chori, then why couldn’t he cross 400 in 2024?
>Why did he lose Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh and Jharkhand?
>Why couldn’t he win Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Punjab?
>Sir, if you have proof of vote chori, then why don’t you go to court?
>If you don’t trust the election process so much, then why don’t you boycott elections?
Sir, when you make such nonsense allegations against Modi ji and Gyanesh Kumar without any strong evidence, we can’t defend you in front of BJP supporters. Honestly, it becomes embarrassing for us...Maybe you’re used to being embarrassed, but we’re not.
Sorry to say, Sir, but we know that you are a loser and you are unable to win elections, so you blame others for your failures.
Sir, I have one request: instead of doing this “vote chori” nonsense, work hard, raise the real issues of the people and rebuild your trust among the public. Maybe then you might win one or two elections.🙏
The problem is our guys do not understand the world order and diplomacy. The way we project ourself to the world as if we are United States of America.
Nations aligned with New International Order did well at the 81st United Nations General Assembly session. These nations are China, Russia, Iran & Pakistan.
India with wrong foreign policy had little to show for itself.
Will explan the above in Hindi/Urdu video to be online by today (Thursday) evening!
A report was published yesterday on the front page of The Indian Express titled ‘14 times in 10 months, two Election Commissioners objected on record to poll panel steps’. This has caused a stir across the country. Towards the end of 2025, prior to the municipal elections, whenever we, leaders of opposition parties in Maharashtra, met the State Chief Election Commissioner and his colleagues, it became evident that they possessed no real authority. I have stated this publicly on numerous occasions; both I and my party have openly raised doubts, or leveled allegations, call it what you will, regarding the functioning of the Election Commission. This report confirms the veracity of what we had been saying all along.
Let alone the State Election Commission; when even two commissioners within the Central Election Commission are sidelined, with decisions implemented while keeping them in the dark or completely disregarding their views, one thing becomes crystal clear: the concept of an autonomous Election Commission is now merely a theoretical notion found in books. Under the current dispensation, ‘autonomy’ is defined as ‘subservience to the Bharatiya Janata Party’. If that condition is met, the body is considered autonomous, otherwise it is not. The objections raised by Election Commissioners Mr. Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Mr. Vivek Joshi are serious, and it is impossible for the Chief Election Commissioner, Mr. Gyanesh Kumar, to dismiss them. Suffice it to say that the identity of the true architect behind his actions is evident.
I am deliberately sharing the link to this Indian Express report here. Every Indian citizen should make the time to read it. You vote and desire change, but this report holds the answers as to why that change will never actually happen.
Over the past ten months, Election Commissioners Mr. Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Mr. Vivek Joshi have gone on record to criticize the Election Commission's functioning on fourteen separate occasions; yet the Commission remained unmoved and proceeded to do exactly as it intended. The Election Commission currently comprises of three chief members: one Chief Election Commissioner—Gyanesh Kumar—and two Election Commissioners—Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. Two of them raised objections, creating the impression that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar was making decisions arbitrarily. However, he was actually being compelled to take those decisions. These objections arose within a span of fourteen months. Gyanesh Kumar was appointed in February 2025. This means that he began pleasing his superiors almost immediately upon assuming office.
Here is a brief outline of the objections raised by the other two Commissioners:
They stated in writing that certain orders regarding voter registration, the deletion of names, and the voter list software were issued without the Commission's approval.
'Form 6' included a query asking whether the applicant's name, or that of a family member, had appeared in the previous electoral roll. The two Commissioners argued that the Commission lacked the authority to ask this and it would necessitate a change in the law.
The powers of local electoral registration officers were drastically curtailed, effectively stripping them of the authority to decide on modifications to the electoral roll; the software left local election officials with virtually no power to make such changes.
In Goa, local officials verified documents and determined that 97 individuals were eligible; however, the software did not provide a timely facility to re-include their names. Consequently, their names did not appear in the final electoral roll. If an official deems a voter eligible but the name fails to appear on the list due to technical reasons, who should be held accountable? (1/2)
https://t.co/CvfIRVIiFj
Its very simple Gyanesh is controlled from top otherwise he will never have the guts to do what he is doing.
The problem with you is also the same. When in opposition don’t try to please the government in power.
So the ECI has now responded to the @IndianExpress investrigation by saying that internal observations are a normal part of deliberation, that its decisions follow the law, that its digital systems have security controls, and that the Commission's decisions over the past year were unanimous.
However, the press note (attached) does not appear to answer several of the specific questions raised in the investigation.
In particular:
Were the reported 14 objections actually recorded, and what was the disposition of each?
What was the specific legal basis for the changes to Form-6, particularly after objections were recorded by Commissioners?
What happened to the concerns regarding centralisation of electoral-roll database access and IT control?
What is the ECI's explanation for the reported Goa case involving 97 voters?
Who authorised the appeals concerning voters whose inclusion had been restored, and under what procedure?
What were the circumstances behind the reported communications to the Cabinet Secretary?
Were any communications issued in the name of the Commission without the requisite approval, as reported?
The distinction seems important: saying that final decisions were unanimous does not, by itself, explain what happened to objections raised during the decision-making process.
It may therefore be useful for @ECISVEEP to provide a point-by-point, documentary clarification on these matters rather than treating the general press note as a complete response to the investigation.
Given the importance of electoral institutions, these questions are worth being placed on the public record and answered transparently.
The Election Commission of India is under fire like never before.
The SIR has struck 13 crore names off draft rolls, putting the EC at the centre of intense public debate over its role in deciding who gets to vote — and who doesn’t.
HOWEVER, what nobody knew: through that same period, some of the sharpest questions were being asked from inside.
Out today, after months of work. Our #ExpressInvestigation 🧵
(1/10)
A huge amount of money is flowing from islamist countries like Qatar to save the Bangladeshi and the Rohingya in India.
They are not happy with the ECI because these outsiders will be removed from the election process, which is a core vote bank of Islamist parties.
I think some opposition parties are realizing that winning elections is getting harder.
So instead of winning the public’s trust, they are trying to make the public lose trust in the system.
Question the institutions. Spread unverified claims. Create doubt. Fuel unrest.
And then present the chaos as proof that the system is broken.
If you cannot win through the ballot, trying to win through public distrust is like playing with fire .
I still don’t understand why some people are convinced that Rahul Gandhi could be a future PM 😭
Like:-
> No convincing communication skills
> Often unclear about what he is actually trying to say
> No administrative experience
> Constantly focused on dividing Hindus along caste lines
> 90+ election losses
After seeing all this, I genuinely wonder what makes people continue to support him 😭
If you can't Win Elections by winning the Confidence of Voters
Target the ECI and the Election Commissioner and call the whole system Fraud
Toolkit 101
#WATCH | Delhi: BJP MP Sambit Patra says, "We are not trying to save any specific individual; we are trying to save India's democracy. We are attempting to counter the malicious propaganda being spread against India's constitutional institutions. These people have already approached the Supreme Court, and no one has stopped them. As for impeachment or raising the issue in Parliament, I challenge: just bring a blank sheet of paper, and I will sign it. When the Winter Session begins, they will not allow the session to run for even a single day; you will see them standing outside, creating a massive ruckus and shouting slogans..."
Save the nation not the mahamanav. Leaders will come n go so will Mahamanav n Thadipar. India the nation of Mahatma Gandhi has to stand tall.
Tu Diya jalao.
I think some opposition parties are beginning to realize that they cannot win elections through the electoral process.
That’s why they are now questioning the system itself and spreading unverified rumors to create the perception that the system is biased and make citizens lose faith in it.
The goal seems to be to create distrust among citizens, trigger unrest, and then use that unrest to challenge the existing system and eventually come to power by exploiting the chaos they have created.
अर्णब : मैं अपर कास्ट हूं, मैं ब्राह्मण हूं।
प्रियंका भारती : समाज ने यह नाम दिया.. आप जन्म से अपर नहीं हैं।👏
स्लिपर शॉट 🤣
शानदार अर्णब की धुलाई हो गई।