Salvatore

Cybersecurity, Bitcoin, Philosophy, Art, Memes. Not in this order.
Aspiring cypherpunk.

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

New pinned post.

[Nandkishor @devops_nk]

Justice for Gemini

[tweet davidson @andyreed]

waking up and seeing your agent stopped to ask for permission 8h ago

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

@danielabrozzoni Ok 👀

[Nux @mherlihy0816]

Someone asked if I was ready for the fall and it took me a second to realize they meant autumn and not the total collapse of society.

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

Ah okay. Now it make sense. Thanks

[Samson Mow @Excellion]

Code is law.
Unless we fuck up.
Then we call the IRS on you.

[Radix @NombreFalso1231]

Llorando con esto.

Por lo visto Ansarallah (los hutíes) han podido conquistar tan fácilmente toda la costa del Mar Rojo porque han generado un deepfake con IA de un comandante enemigo donde le decía a sus tropas que se retiren.

Lo más cyberpunk que he leído en la vida.

[Andrew Côté @Andercot]

The present moment is the shadow of a 4D object that is the timeline of your experience.

[Earth Is A Sales Funnel For SATAN @GENIC0N]

if you can read this you need to understand: this ancestor simulation is a diagnostic program being run to determine why the machine takeover event happened. the real year is 3383, and none of you exist.

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

@_pretyflaco 💯💯

[zerolore @zerolore]

@coinjoined Someone sending back 3400 BTC Is a white hack

I have no idea on what planet you guys are living on BTC land, but someone sending back all this money is 1% of the 1% of hackers

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

Ethical systems are not subjective.

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

Code is law especially in exploiting a vulnerability. Or you're just a fake delusional cyphercuck

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

@a1denvalu3 So you can't be sure this "guy" spent just a couple of hours and $30 to find the vuln. You're contradicting yourself.
BTW, for all I care you could be the Pope

[mononaut @mononautical]

negotiations for the remaining 598.5 BTC are going well

[freemasonslayer 🍓 @freemasnslayr]

If an internal AI model solves P = NP, I will personally strip myself of all earthly belongings and wonder the streets naked like a modern-day Diogenes.

[gdsimms @gdsimms]

who would have guessed there would be turbulence in the navier-stokes community

[Soren Kierkegaard @BumrahBachi]

So basically there's this guy Andrew. He posted a rumor about Anthropic solving navier stokes. Now before we go ahead let's go back in time.

There's this guy levent, he's a mathematical hunk of a dude, makes these cute posts about solving the jacobian conjecture like he just cooked ramen.

Anyway this dude approached Tristan Buckmaster, a math professor from NYU, to collab with him a year ago to solve navier stokes.

They made huge progress using Anthropic and OpenAI models but wanted to release the paper in a normal manner that math nerds could read instead of AI slop.

In the meantime OpenAI was rife with rumors about this stuff. So the prof reached out to a guy he knew at OpenAI to compare notes and address rumors.

According to Tristan he was then rushed into a meeting with his contact and Sebastien Bubeck (smart guy, some say he's the smartest guy at OpenAI, not me but a lot do)

Turns out they both were solving the same problem. Prof then asked how they were doing it and found that they were taking the same path as him which he found hella shady (could be shady, could be big computer who knows)

Prof had used OpenAI products to do research so he asked OpenAI if they looked up his user data and they said no (believable would lead to lot of lawsuits if not) but then prof hit them with the counter about it being trained on that data and got no response.

He did not get an answer but got two proposals (very godfathereqsue)

> he posts his result, openai post theirs but say that he deserves the clay prize (million dollars as this is one of em millennium problems) and that they were the humans closest to it
> he posts his result and the openai result but removes levent coz he's an anthropic boy (OpenAI and Anthropic are like tupac and biggie or drake and kendrick)

Prof declined both and threatened to go public so Sebastien asked why he would ruin his career like that?

Prof got testy and asked why it would ruin his career and Sebastien called him irrational (an emotional bitch when translated from SV to common parlance) behind his back and asked levent to meet secretly who said no (why would he not say no man come on?)

Then prof went public and threw enormous shade on OpenAI though he claimed he didn't have all the facts (but he implied they stole stuff heavily)

Sebastien then posted on twitter to defend his honor saying the speculations have no merit.

Meanwhile another Anthropic guy Sholto Douglas (designated anthropic podcast guy and Australian) told us that levent is a very sweet guy and he was sad he couldn't present his year long collab work they way he wanted (a single tweet and an AI proof probably)

OpenAI top dog Noam Brown thought it would be funny to parody this by copying Sholto but quoting Sebastien and saying he was sad he couldn't present his "week" long collab work they way he wanted. Don't know if he was trying to help or bury the guy, very shakespearean.

Now both openAI and anthropic guys are tweeting about being best buddies and solving alignment. Though openAI are tweeting officially tomorrow.

[Kyan Yang @kyanyang_]

this is insane.

Levent and Tristan make major independent progress towards Navier–Stokes, with help from Claude and Codex.

word reaches OpenAI.

days later, OpenAI claims internal NS results, coincidentally using the same novel methods as Levent and Tristan.

Tristan asks if OpenAI trained on their private Codex sessions. he never gets an answer.

then OpenAI pressures Tristan to publish without Levent because Levent works at Anthropic.

when Tristan refuses, he says OpenAI threatens his career.

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

@piraflappy No they just stealed it

[NIK @ns123abc]

>math professor spends a year on one of the hardest unsolved problems in math
>"Navier-Stokes"
>his drafts for the whole project went through codex sessions
>openai had his logs in codex
>suddenly rumor leaks AI solved it
>he emails openai to ask what's going on
>openai calls within days
>"funny story, our model also solved it"
>using his exact approach
>asks openai: did you train on my sessions?
>no answer

[Salvatore @bitsalv]

Wtf

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

BREAKING: OpenAI reveals a 10,000-agent AI swarm solved the Navier–Stokes problem in 88 hours, using 130 billion output tokens to crack one of mathematics’ most famous unsolved problems.