I have to admit I’m embarrassed that such an arrogant guy represents $ICP at all.
I don’t think I even need to explain how bad the acting is here, or how forced that laughter sounds. This is the behavior of a narcissistic psychopath and a lunatic who clearly still hasn’t learned what humility means. btw, he can't even read... And when he hits rock bottom again, he’ll once again start apologizing, deleting profiles and videos, and saying that from that moment on he’ll only be positive.
Just to remind you, he had a similar outburst... although much milder... in one of his videos where he criticized #TAGGR, telling a completely different story from what he had been saying on TAGGR. Those posts of his are still available.
But Jerry is the golden calf of ICP and untouchable… everything is always forgiven when it comes to him, and he can get away with anything.
Honestly, I don’t care. Anyone can block me or unfollow me, but Jerry is the lowest of the low... and anyone who doesn’t see that, or refuses to see it, has serious problems with judgment.
Good night, ICP community.
You know what’s funny?
Many people still don’t understand what $ICP is, what @dfinity is trying to build, and what they’ve already built.
They still look at it like “just another blockchain,” while missing the bigger picture completely.
There’s a strong chance the $BTC bottom will be around $38k
“The whales are shaking people out” is a washed-up phrase for naive people that has been used for years and years. There is a certain dynamic behind Bitcoin price movement... market cycles, liquidity, psychology, leverage, fear, greed, and historical patterns.
Nothing is guaranteed, of course, but price doesn’t just move randomly because “whales are hunting you.” There are patterns, and people who ignore them usually end up creating fairy tales to explain what they don’t understand.
Don't trust fools like this one... 30k followers and someone offered him 100k to post bearish BTC chart 😂😂😂
I will just post a screenshot, because I'm not giving him additional engagement.
btw, take a look at $ICP and DYOR
Okay, this honestly opened my eyes in a way.
I’m not disappointed, but I’d really like to see people who are already invested in $ICP somehow support and actually use dapps like @clownitx and others.
If they truly believe in ICP, ClownitX is one of those dapps that can even help promote the entire ecosystem and bring new value to it.
ICP is one of those ecosystems whose growth depends on the usage of the entire network, so more usage = more growth... at least that’s how I see it.
Dear $ICP community,
I hear many of you praising @dfinity and the technology they’ve built with ICP, but tell me:
How many ICP dapps do you actually use on a daily basis ? be honest
The more I look at @clownitx, the more I think people still underestimate it.
It has the clown theme, the fun visuals, the meme energy… but underneath that there is a pretty serious idea.
Getting attention is hard.
Keeping it is even harder.
And that is exactly why a tool like this matters. $ICP
I simply can’t wait for the day when people like this cringe lady start coming into the $ICP community, teaching others what ICP is and how valuable it is with their high-minded, metaphorical verbal masturbation.
btw this was one of the first $LINK sell signals 😂
The @clownitx may catch the eye first, but what matters is what sits underneath it.
A serious protocol for serious visibility.
Different projects, different narratives, different audiences... all connected through one system designed to amplify attention, deepen engagement, and push stories further than they could go alone.
That is not just promotion.
That is leverage. $ICP
This is the side of ClownitX many people still underestimate.
Not noise.
Not gimmicks.
A protocol built on $ICP to turn attention into real impact.
The style may be memorable, but the purpose is serious:
help projects get seen, build stronger engagement, and convert visibility into growth.
That is the real power of @clownitx.
Let me make my point more clearly, because some of you are collapsing different arguments into one.
First, in this exchange I was not saying every single datapoint Jerry used was fake. I already said he did use more than one TPS point, and yes, AVAX unlock pressure is a real topic. So let’s get that out of the way.
My issue is what he does with those datapoints.
There is a huge difference between:
“Avalanche has lost momentum, faces real supply pressure, and may be getting outcompeted”
and “Avalanche is absolute garbage, worth $5M at best, going down 99%, and basically does nothing.”
That is not the same thing. The first is criticism. The second is a roast with the conclusion decided in advance.
And no, Avalanche is not just “Ethereum with another logo.” You may dislike it, think it peaked, or think newer chains are more relevant. Fine. But Avalanche still has things that are very real: sovereign L1s, custom validator sets, custom tokenomics, private/permissioned deployments, custom VMs, and EVM compatibility. That is not “nothing.” That is just a model some of you don’t care about.
There are also people acting like any defense of honesty here must mean I’m suddenly an AVAX fan. I’m not. Emin Gün Sirer blocked me a long time ago. That still doesn’t force me to pretend Jerry’s tone is acceptable or his framing is balanced.
And that tone matters. If you open by calling a project “absolute garbage,” say it’s worth “$5M at best,” and predict “down 99%,” then you are not doing serious analysis anymore. You are performing for an audience that already wants to agree with you.
The unlock topic is another example. Yes, the supply overhang is real. But people also talk about it as if every future AVAX token release is the same kind of immediate dumping pressure, when even the public unlock tracking has to model out part of the long-dated staking reward curve. So again: real issue, exaggerated framing.
Same with ICP throughput comparisons. I like $ICP more than anything. But that is exactly why I don’t need to defend every lazy comparison. Big ICP throughput numbers can be real, but people constantly blur together updates, queries, and broader dashboard activity as if it is one neat apples-to-apples TPS figure against every other chain. It isn’t.
So no, this was never about “defending AVAX.”
It was about defending the standard of analysis.
Because once being pro-ICP turns into blindly excusing every clownish conclusion Jerry makes, that is no longer analysis. That is religion.
ICP has enough real strengths on its own.
It does not need this level of caricature, chest-beating, and forced comparison to make a case.
And one more thing: if Avalanche is supposedly such a useless joke, then why is FIFA building on it? You can argue AVAX has faded from its peak, but pretending there is zero real utility there just means ideology has replaced observation.
https://t.co/7sQqMPQrrZ
This is not research. It is a roast dressed up as analysis for people already prepared to agree with it.
I’m not even an $AVAX fan, especially not of Emin Gün Sirer, who blocked me a long time ago... but pretending Avalanche is worthless because Jerry found a few convenient datapoints is just lazy.
That is the problem with this kind of content: followers stop thinking, start parroting, and act like cherry-picked metrics are the same as understanding a network.
$ICP has enough real strengths on its own. It does not need this level of clownish comparison to make a case.
One of the smartest things about @clownitx is that the $ICP community does not need to force a narrative it already believes in.
People are already talking about the ecosystem, already following it, already creating around it.
ClownitX simply gives that energy structure and rewards it.
So it is not only a way to promote the ICP ecosystem more effectively, but also a way for the community to be rewarded for doing what it was going to do anyway.
I really believe the $ICP supporters will be rewarded one day.
The signs were here, but the noise was all around it.
Stay positive and May The Force Be With You.
I really believe the $ICP supporters will be rewarded one day.
The signs were here, but the noise was all around it.
Stay positive and May The Force Be With You.
I like $ICP a lot too, you know that... but this is where people lose me.
The moment you think being pro-ICP means defending every ridiculous conclusion Jerry makes, you stop doing analysis and start doing religion.
He can have some real inputs and still turn them into a clownishly exaggerated conclusion. Those two things are not mutually exclusive.
The summary is decent, but it makes Jerry’s take sound more reasonable than it actually was.
In the video he didn’t just point out issues... he called Avalanche “absolute garbage,” said it’s worth “$5 million at best,” and claimed it will “probably go down 99%.” That’s not really analysis.
He also exaggerated the token unlocks pretty heavily and used a single low TPS snapshot to say activity is stagnant, while ignoring subnets. The video was more of a harsh roast than a balanced critique.
So basically you wan us to spread lies and manipulate, just because they coin got hyped at certain period of time.
"So why not "punish" them a little bit, I mean who cares?"
I care, because it's not my mindset. The similar way Jerry manipulated with some $ICP projects.
This is the side of ClownitX many people still underestimate.
Not noise.
Not gimmicks.
A protocol built on $ICP to turn attention into real impact.
The style may be memorable, but the purpose is serious:
help projects get seen, build stronger engagement, and convert visibility into growth.
That is the real power of @clownitx.
“Avax can’t do anything” is not analysis, it’s just lazy.
You can say Avalanche lost momentum, got outcompeted, or that faster chains exist now. Fine.
But pretending it has no function while it has an EVM-compatible C-Chain, customizable L1s, custom VMs, and permissioned/private deployment options just makes the criticism look unserious.
You do not have to like Avalanche to describe it honestly.
That line says it all.
Some projects stay stuck in the shadows, no matter how good they are. Not because they lack value, but because they lack visibility. And in this space, visibility is everything.
That is what makes @clownitx interesting to me. It takes a project, a product, or a narrative and gives it a stage big enough for people to actually notice it.
Not just another post.
Not just another mention.
A real spotlight.
Because sometimes the difference between being overlooked and being remembered is simply having the right arena. $ICP
Some projects ask for attention.
Others deserve an entire arena.
That is what this feels like to me... @clownitx turning visibility into a spectacle, where every narrative gets a stage big enough to be seen, remembered, and amplified.
Not just a post.
A presence. $ICP
In this temple, visibility is not bought.
It is built... piece by piece, post by post, by many hands moving in the same direction.
That is what makes @clownitx different.
Not artificial hype. Not empty noise.
But collective effort turning attention into something real. $ICP