I’m 20 years old, still a university student.
Before this dispute, I was one of the top 10 YES holders in the Polymarket MicroStrategy market. I lost around 35,000 USDC because I trusted the written rule.
The rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin by May 31.
It did not say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31.
That is the whole issue.
If you want to help:
Repost this.
Tag a journalist.
Tag a lawyer.
Send this to a crypto researcher.
Submit your case if you were affected.
https://t.co/pmXUtr9jFD
Silence is what platforms count on.
Don’t give them that.
🚨 This MicroStrategy BTC sale market on @Polymarket is becoming a serious question of market integrity.
The market asked whether MicroStrategy would sell Bitcoin before May 31, 2026. According to Strategy's own official Bitcoin holdings page, the company sold 32 BTC between May 26–31. An SEC Form 8-K filed on June 1 also confirms the transaction and timing.
Despite this, the market is being pushed toward a NO resolution based on a clause stating that confirmation achieved outside the market's timeframe does not qualify.
The problem? That's not what traders were betting on.
The question was whether the sale happened before May 31 not whether the company publicly disclosed it before May 31. Those are two completely different markets.
Even more concerning, adding or changing rules after an event has already occurred is fundamentally unfair. If new rules or clarifications are needed, they should be announced clearly before they take effect and should only apply to future markets not to markets where people have already placed bets under a different understanding of the rules.
If this interpretation had been clearly stated from the beginning, market pricing and participant decisions would have been very different. Applying a new interpretation after millions of dollars have already been traded undermines confidence in the platform and sets a dangerous precedent.
Prediction markets only work when outcomes are resolved according to the original rules and the actual facts. The sale occurred within the market window, and official company records confirm it.
@Polymarket@UMAprotocol
Resolve the market based on the original rules and what actually happened, not on a retroactive interpretation.
Also, the reason I'm sharing this is not just because of this specific market. Anyone actively trading on prediction markets should understand the risks involved. At the end of the day, this is still a form of speculation, and unexpected outcomes can happen.
Never put in money you cannot afford to lose. Never use your life savings. Only risk an amount that fits within your risk management plan. And most importantly, never revenge trade. If you take a loss, don't immediately deposit more money trying to "win it back." That's how small losses turn into devastating ones.
Protect your capital first. Opportunities will always come again.
#Polymarket #Bitcoin #Crypto
@CezaryGraf@Charon667 If you bought a property for $100,000 USD in 2016:
Cost in TL: ~300,000 TL
Same property in 2025: nominally worth 1,500,000 TL
In USD: ~47,000 USD
You actually LOST money in USD terms despite the property "5xing" in local currency.
@grok Fact check this guy
Hey @TeamYouTube, I just received a strike for 'Organized Crime' on a 10-year-old Sims 1 gameplay video (Video ID: watch?v=HVWxtY_EBcY). This is a clear AI error. I tried to appeal but the form provided no text box for context. Explaining below. 1/2
The video is fictional gameplay. The name mentioned in the title was used for a dark-humor Sim character, NOT as support for any real-world group or individual. This is protected under 'Artistic/Satirical' context. Please have a human reviewer look at this. 2/2