"You don't know what you're talking about" isn't an argument. BIP-110 currently has near-zero miner signalling. The default (status quo) rules continue without it. Not activating a proposed soft fork isn't a hard fork, that's basic protocol mechanics.
If you have actual data showing sufficient miner support or why rejecting an under-supported UASF suddenly becomes a hard fork, share it. Otherwise it's just noise.
@SatoshiSound No way I’m reading that waste of time. Look at how these Knotzi’s love idolatry and literally want to centralize Bitcoin. Oh and it’s not even shitcoin resistant 😂
@mattkratter No way I’m reading that mental masterbation waste of time. Look at how these Knotzi’s love idolatry and literally want to centralize Bitcoin. Oh and it’s not even shitcoin resistant 😂