sabroshi

bitcoin dev.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

The first blockchain to support this kind of spam data wins. This is a raspberry pi hooked up to a bicycle lol. Imagine the data from 100M self driving cars.

TPS & Fees are all that’s holding the crypto industry back. Bring back OG Bitcoin

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

Based

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

There is something exquisitely modern in the belief that every limitation of intellect must therefore be a flaw in reality itself. One encounters these people endlessly now — men who prod at Bitcoin as a provincial tourist pokes at a cathedral, declaring the architecture defective because they cannot locate the lavatory.

“If I cannot figure out how to do it,” they cry, “then surely the base layer must change.” And by this they mean, naturally, that the entire system should be dismantled, rewritten, re-engineered, softened, diluted, infantilised, and reduced to the intellectual dimensions of the average committee member.

The conceit is almost touching.

The universe, however, has never reorganised itself around incompetence, and Bitcoin least of all. The protocol is not a mood. It is not a political manifesto, nor a therapeutic support group for underperforming developers. It does not bend because someone arrived late to mathematics.

Bitcoin is set in stone. The rules are the rules. The number of Sats is the number of Sats. Arithmetic does not hold referendums for the bewildered.

And if one cannot grasp the system, the proper conclusion is not that the system must change, but that one is perhaps not the be-all and end-all of human cognition. A shocking revelation, admittedly, to those raised on the modern superstition that confusion is oppression.

Well, get the fuck over it.

Bitcoin does not require your approval any more than gravity requires your consent. If you dislike immutability, there are countless soft and malleable toys elsewhere in the digital world designed precisely for those who find permanence emotionally distressing.

Move on.

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

There is something exquisitely modern in the belief that every limitation of intellect must therefore be a flaw in reality itself. One encounters these people endlessly now — men who prod at Bitcoin as a provincial tourist pokes at a cathedral, declaring the architecture defective because they cannot locate the lavatory.

“If I cannot figure out how to do it,” they cry, “then surely the base layer must change.” And by this they mean, naturally, that the entire system should be dismantled, rewritten, re-engineered, softened, diluted, infantilised, and reduced to the intellectual dimensions of the average committee member.

The conceit is almost touching.

The universe, however, has never reorganised itself around incompetence, and Bitcoin least of all. The protocol is not a mood. It is not a political manifesto, nor a therapeutic support group for underperforming developers. It does not bend because someone arrived late to mathematics.

Bitcoin is set in stone. The rules are the rules. The number of Sats is the number of Sats. Arithmetic does not hold referendums for the bewildered.

And if one cannot grasp the system, the proper conclusion is not that the system must change, but that one is perhaps not the be-all and end-all of human cognition. A shocking revelation, admittedly, to those raised on the modern superstition that confusion is oppression.

Well, get the fuck over it.

Bitcoin does not require your approval any more than gravity requires your consent. If you dislike immutability, there are countless soft and malleable toys elsewhere in the digital world designed precisely for those who find permanence emotionally distressing.

Move on.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@JacobYako2 Why don’t you build it? BSV is full of people who think they know the answer but won’t or “cant” build it themselves.

Also, every other coins association/central authority incentivizes devs to build things they think are useful. BSVA does not.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@___siggi___ @Kate_L_Mosso @BSVAssociation It’s overwhelmingly the worst association in all of crypto.

BSVA literally repels talented builders.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@marcecat28 @coinyeezy Their sheets are 19-1 over past 72 hours

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

random sports bot betting acct popped up on my feed and I tailed. Both hit so far kekek

@coinyeezy dis u?

[Moisty Bets @MoistyBets]

EARLY ENTRIES HIT

Houston vs Oklahoma State ✅
Georgia TECH vs Clemson ✅

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@MoistyBets Lol wtf

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@MoistyBets im in at target on both games. dont lost me my monies

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@theRealKiyosaki Unfortunately you are buying Epstein Bitcoin….

The true Bitcoin is one of the forks from 2017. BCH or BSV

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@barneyxbt imagine buying the real Bitcoin for $17 in 2026 lol

Might want to grab a few just in case…

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

BCH or BSV?

[barney @barneyxbt]

epstein funded the creation of tether and the implementation of taproot.

both conveniently stopped bitcoin from doing the one thing it was built to do - replace the dollar

tether props up crypto with printed tokens backed by nothing. USDT & USDC defeated the purpose of sending bitcoin to one another as payment.

taproot killed on-chain scaling so btc could never threaten visa or the fed.

they didn’t kill bitcoin they neutered it and let you keep the t-shirt

the whitepaper says peer to peer electronic cash.

not digital gold. not store of value. not something you hold on coinbase and hope.

if btc was deliberately crippled from scaling then which fork actually kept the original vision alive.

BSV or BCH ?

one of them is the real bitcoin and the fact you’ve been trained to laugh at both should tell you everything you need to know.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@Decentralizd @kreeflewer https://t.co/jGAZcwrdem

[Zack Wins @DevelopingZack]

@thomasshearer77 @clemensley @cryptoAcorns You're aware that BTC isn't actually Bitcoin anymore because of #SigWit right? As in, Segregated Witness by its very nature distorts the game theory determinism of BFT...

[Degentralizd(🌎☮️🏴‍☠️) @Decentralizd]

REMEMBER WHEN THE CO FOUNDER OF BLOCKSTREAM, (Gregory Maxwell aka Nullc) THE GUY WHO LOOKS LIKE A PEDO, OUTRIGHT LIED ABOUT EPSTEIN FUNDING BLOCKSTREAM?

same dude was responsible for all the blocklists, banning and gaslighting of the conversation surrounding big blocks.

theyre all feds from mossad or mossad adjacent atleast.

time to end blockstream.

[Harrison H. Smith ✞ @HarrisonHSmith]

I might get killed for posting this, the least you could do is watch it.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@Decentralizd @kreeflewer Segwit forces transactions and data offchain to scale.

That’s not bitcoin.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@kreeflewer @Decentralizd It can’t even be hijacked back w a hard fork because Segwit ruined it 😂

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@Decentralizd @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 I agree screaming about it would never work and I had also given up on that but the recent Epstein/Mossad connections seem like a realistic catalyst to get ppl to understand.

It’s a much more consumable topic now than it has been for the past 8 years.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@Decentralizd @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 Yea but the only reason everyone assumes that is because of a giant mossad propaganda campaign.

That doesn’t seem like too much of an uphill battle to win. It’s obvious everyone was duped.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@Decentralizd @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 Why is it not up for debate that BTC is actually the fork and BCH is actually bitcoin?

That’s what I don’t understand.

[sabroshi @BitcoinGh0st]

@Decentralizd @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 I still don’t understand the mother chain argument. The ticker symbol makes it the mother chain?

Putting a Ferrari badge on Buick does not make it a Ferrari.

By all technical regards BTC has always been the fork. Epstein/Mossad just got the world to call the fork BTC