@ZLOK It's been pretty disappointing. I think the anti-110 side shouldn't have engaged with them. The 110 crowd is operating on vibes, and when you try to engage in technical discourse, they interpret that as an admission of guilt. You are a spammer, or predator if you don't want 110.
@BoringBiz_ It is not FIRE pulling people out, the incentives have us looking for the door. We love achievement, providing value, and building a legacy. There's just more opportunities to experience those things outside of the work force.
@BoringBiz_ We found lack of purpose in a society that continually piles more responsibility onto us in order to secure the votes of our peers. Our skills, hard work and dedication are expected, as nothing works without us, but that does not provide purpose. We must find it elsewhere.
@MrHodl Read Luke's tweets as if he's an actor, trying to say what a hypothetical attacker would say to rally the support of uninformed network participants.
@MrHodl If we are at the stage of nation state involvement in bitcoin, I think there would be a series "stress tests" performed to ensure it works as stated. I think we've seen some of these already, but how else do you ensure consensus can't be captured by a minority or figurehead?
@MrHodl I don't have any non-anecdotal evidence to support this idea, but it sure would make a lot more sense than the BIP-110 narrative. If the real intent of BIP-110 is demonstrate resilience to this particular attack vector.
@OptimistFields Keyboarding classes never worked for me, eventually I just purchased a keyboard with no markings on it, and soon I was typing like a normal person.
@vryfokkenou "Pointless pursuit" is the best-case scenario. Building the foundation of the censorship committee, and effectively making bitcoin identical to every other shitcoin is where these incentives end up.