I don't want people to simply buy Bitmaps.
I want people to understand them.
Understand the block.
Understand the claim.
Understand the territory.
Understand what ownership could enable.
Then build.
The next chapter of Bitmap won't be written by one team.
It will be written by everyone who looks at a piece of Bitcoin and thinks:
โI can build something here.โ
That's the experiment. ๐ง
Thanks to @bitmapstr for being the first to create a PR for exactly this, a long time ago, on the behalf of the bitmap community. (If my memory serves me right)
The next Ord release will have a new recursive endpoint, `/r/block/`, which returns the entire 4 MB block data.
That means:
๐ง Every Bitmap visualization can be built entirely inside inscriptions up to the current block, including transaction value anatomy (standard Bitmap/BitMon) and vBytes anatomy.
๐ง Indexing of the latest Bitmaps recursively.
๐ง Finally, accurate Bitmap indexing. You can search the entire block for Ord envelopes/potential Bitmaps, then call `/r/content` to pull the actual inscription content while indexing. No more arbitrary parsing rules, broken Bitmaps, or indexing issues caused by weird data formatting, OP_PUSH, etc.
๐ง Find every inscription in a block more efficiently than simply returning a list of inscription IDs. You can parse the entire block and analyze potential inscriptions to determine which ones to actually pull. For example, you could pull the block, easily filter out all BRC-20 inscriptions, and fetch only images/models based on MIME type.
Congrats @rodarmor and Bitmappers ๐ The Bitcoin multiverse just got one step closer. ๐๐ง๐ฆ
Consume
or be consumed.
Be a number
or remember you are the summation.
01010101010101010
Set a reminder for our upcoming Space!
https://t.co/qKdEvzTLfm
BLX LiDS ARE LIVE!
Earn them now through your profile, wallet, assets, and community activity, then use them inside blixworld.
Start stacking early ๐ read the full breakdown ๐
This isn't a question of a Bitcoin or Bitmap consensus rule, its a question of Ordinals protocol convention, provenance and parent-child relationship.
Valid parcels are not a timing rule between two later transactions. A parcel is a child only if the district is spent in that same inscribe transaction. No spend in that tx means no parent-child relationship(and so not a valid parcel). A later same-wallet transfer cannot create it.